The term structure is one of the most common words in the vocabulary of the social sciences. Yet, even a cursory glance at the literature reveals that a clear conception of what it means and does, is quite generally lacking. In this contribution we try and develop just such a conception, and show that, and how, it is essential to understanding the mechanics and dynamics of social systems at any level of inquiry. In particular, it will appear that both individuals and social groups of any kind or size represent nonlinear dynamical systems, something which is not without important consequences for behavioral or sociological research. Moreover, the structure of these several systems turns out to have precisely the same form. As a consequence, too, the common distinction between micro‐ and macrosociology loses much of its dogmatic or theoretical meaning.
The structure of action and interaction: The structural similarity of systems in social science
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.