Abstract
Three frameworks have been proposed to account for interpersonal synchronization: The information processing approach argues that synchronization is achieved by mutual adaptation, the coordination dynamics perspective supposes a continuous coupling between systems, and complexity matching suggests a global, multi-scale interaction. We hypothesized that the relevancy of these models was related to the nature of the performed tasks. 10 dyads performed synchronized tapping and synchronized forearm oscillations, in two conditions: full (participants had full information about their partner), and digital (information was limited to discrete auditory signals). Results shows that whatever the task and the available information, synchronization was dominated by a discrete mutual adaptation. These results question the relevancy of the coordination dynamics perspective in interpersonal coordination.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the Union Sportive Léo Lagrange, awarded to the first author.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data Availability
The data set associated with this paper is available at the following address: https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https%3A%2F%2Fosf.io%2Fk4urf%2Fdownload