ABSTRACT
Helicarionid land snails with large shells have been placed in three genera: Malandena, Pravonitor and Elatonitor. These taxa are revised herein using comparative morpho-anatomy and mitochondrial phylogenetics. We demonstrate that these species represent three independent radiations, but this is not reflected in the current generic arrangement. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed that these genera do not form a monophyletic group, and we conclude that large shells have evolved multiple times among helicarionids in Queensland, Australia, presumably as an adaptation to moist environments. Species belonging to Pravonitor have a medium-sized to large, glossy shell, often with a peripheral band. Among other traits, they always have a single-chambered, internally pustulose or ridged penis, an epiphallus with a slender flagellum, and a long epiphallic caecum with medial penial retractor muscle attachment. This genus comprises eight species: Pravonitor kreffti, P. ferrugineus, P. insularum, P. annulus, P. aquilonia comb. nov., P. monteithi comb. nov., P. septentrionalis sp. nov. and P. stuarti sp. nov. We describe Geminitor gen. nov. for Geminitor laura comb. nov., G. villaris comb. nov., G. kullaensis sp. nov., G. macveae sp. nov. and G. wenlockensis sp. nov. Geminitor has a small to medium-sized shell, a long, two-chambered penis, an epiphallus with a slender flagellum, and an epiphallic caecum with basal penial retractor muscle attachment. The unavailable genus name Malandena is subsumed under Elatonitor, which now contains Elatonitor montanus and E. suturalis comb. nov. Elatonitor has a large glossy shell with an angulate periphery, a long, narrow, single-chambered penis with longitudinal pilasters, an epiphallus with a broad flagellum, and no epiphallic caecum. While this study has nearly doubled the number of known large helicarionid species in Far North Queensland, there are still knowledge gaps and we recommend further surveys to search for undocumented species, improve our understanding of species distribution and undertake vital conservation assessments.
http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:83362BEC-6E6B-4B65-AC1E-F49762C744B8
Acknowledgements
This work has been made possible through financial support from the Australian government (ABRS grant RF215–49), which is gratefully acknowledged. We extend our thanks to Adnan Moussalli and Chris Rowley (NMV), Darryl Potter and John Stanisic (QM), Jonathan Ablett (NHMUK), Anna Persson (NHRM), and Mandy Reid and Alison Miller (AM) for providing material and photographs and for assistance with loans. We are also grateful to Martin Püschel and Michael Shea for carrying out the anatomical drawings, and to Sue Lindsay, Jennifer Caiza and Geoff Thompson for providing shell photographs. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and detailed comments on the manuscript, which helped to improve the quality of this work.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.