594
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial Summary

Recent activities in the field of General Issues

&
Pages 133-135 | Received 15 Aug 2013, Accepted 20 Sep 2013, Published online: 21 Oct 2013

The Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology and the Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (in Japanese) consist of 11 classified areas of expertise which include a wide range of topics in social science, natural science, engineering and technology-relating nuclear issues. The first category of these areas is classified as General Issues. The General Issues cover philosophy, ethics, justice, politics, policy, international relations, economics, sociology, environment, education and training, information and database, and nuclear non-proliferation and safeguards. The authors describe the recent research articles and reviews in the two journals to highlight research trends in this research area.

In the field of economics and strategy of nuclear fuel cycle, research activities for cost analysis, and partitioning and transmutation issues have proceeded. A cost analysis for a new type of nuclear fuel, BeO-UO2, was studied in the nuclear fuel cycle [Citation1], an evaluation of depreciation cost in replacement of nuclear power plant (NPP) [Citation2] and a long-term outlook for uranium and uranium enrichment supply [Citation3] were presented. Cost analysis and evaluation are essential for feasibility studies of innovative reactor concept and future nuclear fuel cycle, so that the authors will hope these contributions become active. Scenario analysis of partitioning and transmutation issues of the UK, France, the USA and Japan have also been studied [Citation4–8]. The energy security and nuclear security issues that have become important since the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku, and the severe nuclear accident of 11 March 2011 have also been discussed [Citation9–11].

In the field of geological repository, a comprehensive review of Japan's situation was recently presented [Citation12]. In addition, social issues relating high-level radioactive waste, which is a major concern in Japan, have been actively discussed [Citation13–15].

Regarding social communication including public opinion surveys, activities in this area have been performed [Citation16,17]. Public opinion surveys on nuclear energy are actively conducted by many institutions; however, over 30 years of analysis are quite useful to recognize the history of public attitude. The social issues have become a prominent concern for the consensus-building and decision-making process of nuclear energy in society.

Major nuclear accidents, such as the accident in Fukushima, have been shown to decrease the public's acceptance of nuclear power. However, little is known about how a serious accident affects people's acceptance of nuclear power and the determinants of acceptance. Some studies were performed in Switzerland and the USA. Even after a severe accident, the public may still consider the benefits as relevant, and trust remains important for determining their risk and benefit perceptions based on a longitudinal survey in Switzerland [Citation18,19]. An ecological multidisciplinary approach is suggested to protect society, human health and the environment for nuclear installations [Citation20].

Social trust has strong effects on perceived benefits and risks, so that the study of trust in risk management will be more important after the accident in Fukushima. Several studies and reviews are invaluable to understand the structure of trust [Citation21,22]. The differences between the traditional view of trust and the salient value similarity (SVS) model are also well studied [Citation23–25]. The authors will hope that these research contributions become more active.

In the field of non-proliferation and safeguards, extensive studies have been performed [Citation26–30]. A research group of Tokyo Institute of Technology and Japan Atomic Energy Agency focuses on material composition and decay heat as an index of nuclear proliferation resistance.

In the field of nuclear regulatory governance and relations with local governments, some articles and reviews were presented [Citation31–34]. These discussions will be valuable to promote a new regulatory process and method for the Nuclear Regulation Authority in Japan.

In the field of education and training, education method and tool for fast reactor have been developed [Citation35,36]. Education and training are the essential bases for peaceful use of nuclear energy. The authors will expect that this educational research will become more active and with increased sharing of information among many institutions.

Since 11 March 2013, social and environmental impacts have arisen as a consequence of the accident of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP. Extensive articles, reviews and rapid communications are described as the Fukushima NPP accident-related category not only in the General Issues, but also in other technical areas. These materials will be valuable, hereafter, for verification investigation of the accident at the Fukushima NPP. The authors do not describe in detail those articles; however, two comprehensive reviews deserve mentioning. One is a review of insights from the comprehensive report of the Japanese Government to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ministerial conference held in June 2011 [Citation37]. They discussed the safety issues raised by the accident, based on the insights in order to contribute to establishing a new framework of safety standards. The other is a review of five investigation committees’ reports on the Fukushima accident [Citation38]. They discussed mainly technical causes and issues as to why we could not have prevented the accident. They also indicate the unclear issues in the official investigation reports to promote the near-term regulatory activities by the Nuclear Regulation Authority.

In concluding remarks, many articles have been published in this area. The authors will continuously expect many submissions to the General Issues and hope progress in those research activities. The authors also expect articles in English will be on the increase to share information worldwide.

References

  • Kim S, Ko W, Zhou W, Revankar ST, Chung Y, Bang S. The credit analysis of recycling beryllium and uranium in BeO-UO2 nuclear fuel. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2012;49(3):298–309.
  • Nakada S, Takashima R, Nagano K, Kimura H, Madarame H. [Evaluation of depreciation costs in replacement investments of nuclear power plants]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2010;9(3):252–270. Japanese.
  • Matsuo Y, Murakami T. [Long-term outlook for global natural uranium and uranium enrichment supply and demand situations after the impact of Fukushima Dai-ich nuclear power plant accident]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2011;11(4):281–303. Japanese.
  • Worrall A, Gregg R. Scenario analyses of future UK fuel cycle options. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(3):249–256.
  • Warin D. Status of the French program on partitioning and transmutation. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(3):410–414.
  • Wigeland RA, Bauer TH, Hill RN, Stillman JA. Impact on geological repository usage from limited actinide recycle in pressurized light water reactors. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(3):415–422.
  • Ahn J. Deterministic assessment for environmental impact of Yucca mountain repository measured by radiotoxicity. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2007;44(3):431–440.
  • Nishihara K, Oigawa H, Nakayama S, Ono K, Shiotani H. Impact of partitioning and transmutation on high-level waste disposal for the fast breeder reactor fuel cycle. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2010;47(12):1101–1117.
  • Yamada E. [Study on the contribution of nuclear power to the improvement in energy security level]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2009;8(3):230–244. Japanese.
  • Ujita H. [A study on energy security and nuclear energy role]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2011;10(1):1–11. Japanese.
  • Irie K. [Present situation and problems of nuclear-security-related legislation in Japan]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2013;12(1):13–31. Japanese.
  • Tochiyama O, Masuda S. Building technical and social confidence in the safety of geological disposal in Japan. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013;50(7):665–673.
  • Wada R, Tanaka S, Nagasaki S. [Social acceptance process model for ensuring the high-level radioactive waste disposal site]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2009;8(1):19–33. Japanese.
  • Kimura H, Tanaka H, Katsumura S, Furuta K. [Experimental study of web communication about high-level radioactive waste]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2009;8(3):197–210. Japanese.
  • Yamashita Y, Tanaka S. [Role of national academies in radioactive waste disposal projects]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2012;11(3):177–192. Japanese.
  • Karikawa D, Yagi E, Toba T, Takahashi M, Kitamura M. [Research on design of dialogue session concerning nuclear technology]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2010;9(2):150–165. Japanese.
  • Kitada J. [Public opinion on nuclear power generation measured in continuous polls]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2013;12(3):177–196. Japanese.
  • Siegrist M, Visschers V. Acceptance of nuclear power: the Fukushima effect. Energy Policy. 2013;59:112–119.
  • Visschers V, Siegrist M. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Anal. 2013;33(2):333–347.
  • Burger J, Gochfield M, Clarke J, Powers C, Kosson D. An ecological multidisciplinary approach to protecting society, human health, and the environment at nuclear facilities. Remediat J. 2013;23(3):123–148.
  • Luhmann N. Trust and power: two works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester: Wiley; 1979.
  • Yamagishi T. [Structure of trust]. Bunkyo: University of Tokyo; 1998. Japanese.
  • Earle T, Cvetovich G. Social trust: toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport (CT): Praeger Press; 1995.
  • Cvetovich G, Nakayachi K. Trust in a high-concern risk controversy: a comparison of three concepts. J Risk Res. 2007;10:223–237.
  • Earle, T. Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal. 2010;30(4):541–574.
  • Kimura Y, Saito M, Sagara H. Evaluation of proliferation resistance of plutonium based on decay heat. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(5):715–723.
  • Permana S, Suzuki M, Saito M. Basic analysis on isotopic barrier of material attractiveness based on plutonium composition of FBR. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(5):724–733.
  • Lee C, Suzuki D, Esaka F, Magara M, Shinohara N, Usuda S. Selective detection of particles containing highly enriched uranium for nuclear safeguards environmental samples. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2009;46(8):809–813.
  • Inamura T, Madarame H. [Consideration on the current status and issues of sensitive information management concerning the physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2009;8(4):320–331. Japanese.
  • Inoue N, Kuno Y. [Safeguards system of advanced aqueous reprocessing for nuclear proliferation resistance enhancement]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2010;9(3):305–317. Japanese.
  • Sugawara S, Shiroyama H, Nishiwaki Y, Morokuzu M. [A study on the institutional design concerning role-sharing between national and local governments about nuclear safety regulation in Japan]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2012;11(1):37–48. Japanese.
  • Sugawara S, Tanabe T, Kimura H. [A study on the nuclear safety agreements]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2011;10(2):119–131. Japanese.
  • Torikai S, Ozawa M, Kanegae N, Tani M, Madarame H, Miyakoshi N. [Analysis on misconducts and inappropriate practices by Japan's nuclear power utilities and assessment of their corrective measures]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2010;9(4):347–359. Japanese.
  • Sugaya J, Harayama Y. [Categorization and selection of regulatory approaches for nuclear power plants]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2009;8(2):110–121. Japanese.
  • Latge C, Rodriguez G, Baque F, Leclerc A, Martin L, Vray B, Romanetti P. Teaching sodium fast reactor technology and operation for the present and future generations of SFR users. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(4):701–708.
  • Yoshikawa S, Minami M, Takahashi T. Trial visualization of fast reactor design knowledge. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2011;48(4):709–714.
  • Hirano M, Yonomoto T, Ishigaki M, Watanabe N, Maruyama Y, Shibamoto Y, Watanabe T, Moriyama K. Insights from review and analysis of the Fukushima Dai-ich accident. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2012;49(1):1–17.
  • Watanabe N, Yonomoto T, Tamaki H, Nakamura T, Maruyama Y. [Review of five investigation committee's reports on the Fukushima Dai-ich nuclear power plant severe accident]. Trans At Energy Soc Japan. 2013;12(2):113–127. Japanese.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.