Kawai K, Sagara H, Takeshita K, et al. High burn-up operation and MOX burning in LWR; Effects of burn-up and extended cooling period of spent fuel on vitrification and disposal. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2018.1480427
When the above article was first published online, the in-text citation for references 10, 11, 15, 16, and 17 were cited in wrong place. Those places are listed below:
Section 2.4.1
The repository with vertical emplacement concept in crystalline rock (hard rock) at the depth of 1,000m below the surface [10].
The previous report [10] describes that the … occupied area per waste package is 44.4m2. Furthermore, the report [10] … negligibly small.
Here all of three [10] should be replaced by [11]
Section 2.4.2
The upper temperature limit … the report [10].
However, it is reported … buffer material [10].
Here both [10] should be replaced by [11].
Section 3.3
In the case of 4 years … in the previous report [10], are needed for approximately 50 years on UO2 fuel, and 80 years on MOX fuel.
Here [10] should be replaced by [11].
Section 2.4.2
So analysis without gap was … this calculation [14,15].
Here [14,15] should be replaced by [15, 16].
Section 3.1.2
As the representatives of transuranium … 238Pu (T1/2 = 87.7y) are listed [16]. The … of 241Pu (T1/2 = 14.29y) [16]. 238Pu generating from alpha decay of 242Cm (T1/2 = 162.8d) significantly … spent fuel [16].
Here all of three [16] should be replaced by [17].
These errors have been corrected in both print and online versions.
Taylor & Francis apologizes for these errors.