292
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Personality Factors Associated With Psychological Distress in Testicular Cancer Survivors

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 348-355 | Received 19 Jul 2006, Published online: 25 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate symptoms of anxiety and depression in testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) and to identify personality traits associated with psychological distress in these patients by means of the MMPI (CitationHathaway & McKinley, 1943). A total of 50 TCSs and 50 age-adjusted healthy men participated in the study, and we used the following self-report instruments: Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (CitationMontgomery & Asberg, 1979), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (CitationHamilton, 1959, Citation1969), Spielberger's State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (CitationSpielberger, 1970, Citation2005), and the MMPI. TCSs displayed higher rates on all psychopathology scales studied compared to controls, but the majority of the patients' scores were within the “normal range,” indicating rather mild psychological distress. TCSs' MMPI profiles showed higher rates on Scales 1, 3, 6, and 9 compared to controls; and within the TCSs sample, symptoms of depression were most closely associated with Scales 3 and 5. Similarly, anxiety symptoms were mainly associated with Scale 3. These findings indicate that TCSs present mild symptoms of psychological distress, mainly anxiety and depressive symptoms, suggesting that careful assessment and consultation in TC patients is essential to help them deal with distress after treatment and to minimize possible risk factors.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Katerina Antoniou, Lecturer of Pharmacology, for her important comments and her helpful criticism.

Notes

a N = 50.

b N = 50.

c Glass's d as the effect size.

d The control group SD was used in calculating effect size.

e Two-tailed t tests.

f Ordinal polychotomus method was used in calculating effect size.

g Chi-square tests.

h Social class classification according to Hollingshead–Reslich 2-point scale; “I” indicates higher socioeconomic status (CitationHollingshead & Reslich, 1958).

i Probit method was used in calculating effect size.

a Two-stage least-squares (hierarchical) regression analyses.

b Pearson's product–moment bivariate correlation coefficients.

c Instrumental variables.

a Glass's d as the effect size; the control groupSD is used in calculating this effect.

b Statistical significance based on two-tailed t tests (when variances were not equal by Levene's test for the equality of variances, p was obtained from the t-test output that corrects for unequal variances).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 344.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.