392
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Dimensionality, Reliability, Invariance, and Validity of the Multidimensional Social Anxiety Response Inventory–21 (MSARI–21)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 527-537 | Received 30 Apr 2018, Accepted 02 Dec 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2019
 

Abstract

Research shows that social anxiety disorder (SAD) is prevalent in the United States, and could interfere with many aspects of a person’s life. Although numerous psychological instruments have been developed to measure presence and intensity levels of social anxiety, these instruments fail to capture the range of responses individuals use to mitigate the negative affect associated with the anxiety, namely alcohol use and anger distress. Recently, the Multidimensional Social Anxiety Response Inventory–21 (MSARI–21) was developed to address this limitation and increase our understanding of the complexity of social anxiety. We expand on this work by evaluating the psychometric properties of the instrument, using a combination of exploratory structural equation and bifactor modeling, and item response techniques. Across 2 studies, data indicated the presence of a strong, 3-factor structure (i.e., anger distress, alcohol reliance, and social avoidance), strong internal consistency, and evidence of both convergent and discriminant validity. In addition, results showed that the MSARI–21 multidimensional structure was invariant across gender. We conclude that the MSARI–21 is a valid and valuable tool for assessing individuals’ responses to social anxiety, and that future research should evaluate the instrument within other samples to ensure its utility across clinical and subclinical populations.

Notes

1 We indicated the “negative” in parentheses because of the ongoing discussion in the extant literature that social anxiety should be reconceptualized to consider anxiety-related responses to positive comments (see, e.g., Skocic, Jackson, & Hulbert, Citation2015).

2 The analyses for each of these studies are available in detail in an unpublished manual (Osman et al., Citation2015). Results from these studies provided strong empirical support for a three-factor model (i.e., anger distress, alcohol reliance, and social avoidance), and each factor was comprised of seven items.

Additional information

Funding

Jessica Perrotte was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F31AA026477. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 344.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.