960
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development and Initial Validation of the Persevering Hope Scale: Measuring Wait-Power in Four Independent Samples

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 58-73 | Received 02 Feb 2021, Accepted 20 Dec 2021, Published online: 01 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Hope has been conceptualized as agency and pathways to achieve goals. However, this goal-directed conceptualization does not encapsulate all situations in which hope may be beneficial. To address the dispositional motivation to endure when a desired goal seems unattainable, unlikely, or even impossible (i.e., goal-transcendent hope), we provide initial psychometric evidence for the new Persevering Hope Scale (PHS). We developed and refined the PHS with undergraduates at a public college (Study 1) and replicated our findings in a community adult sample (Study 2). We replicated and extended these findings using longitudinal data with undergraduates at a faith-based college (Study 3) and a community sample of chronically ill adults (Study 4), and examined measurement invariance (Study 5). Scores on the PHS demonstrated robust evidence of estimated internal consistency and of criterion-related, convergent/discriminant, and incremental validity. Estimated temporal stability was modest. Partial scalar invariance was evidenced across samples, and full scalar invariance was evidenced across gender, race/ethnicity, and time. These preliminary findings suggest that the PHS is a psychometrically sound measure of persevering hope. Its use can broaden the current body of literature on trait hope to include goal-transcendent hope and advance research on the nature and benefits of this important construct.

Video Abstract

Read the transcript

Watch the video on Vimeo

© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Disclosure statement

There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the following authors upon reasonable request: Study 1 (JMM), Study 2 (EBD), and Study 3 (SYR). Data for Study 4 are publicly available (https://osf.io/2anvx/).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Wheaton College Alumni Association to the first author (SYR).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 344.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.