279
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining the Factor Structure and Incremental Utility of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires via Bifactor Analysis

, , &
Pages 238-248 | Received 16 Jul 2021, Accepted 12 May 2022, Published online: 08 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

The negative emotional contrast avoidance model posits that pathological worry is maintained by the avoidance of negative emotional shifts. The Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires (CAQ–Worry and CAQ–General Emotion) aim to assess contrast avoidance beliefs and behaviors. Questions remain around the factor structures of the CAQs, whether such structures replicate in nonundergraduate samples, and whether their domain-specific factors are valid for independent use. This study used bifactor analysis in a large community sample (N = 827) to address these gaps in the literature. Results supported bifactor models of both measures. Complementary analyses supported the multidimensionality of the CAQ–Worry, including its strong general factor and independent use of two domain-specific factors, rather than the original three domain-specific factors. The CAQ–General Emotion’s general factor was strong, but the merits of the Discomfort domain-specific factor require more exploration, and use of the Avoidance domain-specific factor is discouraged.

Notes

1 The hierarchical model of the CAQ–W was compared to the two-factor and three-factor bifactor models in terms of variance explained (R2) in PSWQ–10 and GAD–7 latent scores (all ps < .001). When predicting worry, both the two-factor and three-factor bifactor models explained 9% to 10% more variance in worry (R2 = .53 and .54, respectively) than the CAQ–W hierarchical model (R2 = .44) and 9% to 11% more variance in GAD symptoms (R2 = .43 and .45, respectively) than the CAQ–W hierarchical model (R2 = .34).

2 The correlated factors model of the CAQ–GE was compared to its bifactor counterpart in terms of variance explained (R2) in PSWQ–10 and GAD–7 latent scores (all ps < .001). The CAQ–GE bifactor model explained an equivalent amount of variance in worry (R2 = .57) and GAD symptoms (R2 = .47) compared to the CAQ–GE correlated factors model (R2 = .56 and .48, respectively).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 344.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.