Abstract
Statisticians are increasingly finding applications which require separate linear models for a response of interest and this response's variance. A crucial question then becomes what are reasonable experimental strategies which will allow the estimation of both of these functions. This paper pursues two distinct approaches: a one-step approach which, in the absence of any information about the process variance, initially assumes that the process variance is constant over the region of interest; and a one-step, semi-Bayesian approach which attempts to develop an appropriate experimental plan in light of prior information about the nature of the variance function. These two approaches are compared in a simulation study to illuminate their relative advantages and disadvantages. An example illustrates the proposed methodology.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
G. Geoffrey Vining
Dr. Vining is an Associate Professor in the Department of Statistics. He is a Senior Member of ASQC.
Diane Schaub
Dr. Schaub is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Senior Member of ASQC.