Abstract
The standard method to assess a measurement system's precision is a gauge repeatability and reproducibility (gauge R&R) study. It exploits replications to estimate variance components that are interpreted as measurement spread. For nonrepeatable measurements, it is not feasible to obtain replications because objects are destroyed when they are measured or because the object changes over time. Possible solutions are to replace replications with measurements of multiple objects or with the measurement of one object at multiple times. Subsequently, these measurements are modeled by a fixed pattern (over time or over positions). We show that the experimental design used in this type of nonrepeatable gauge R&R studies is best constructed in a way that is similar to a Latin square design. These designs have a great flexibility, can be applied in many situations encountered in practice, and have nice mathematical properties as well. We consider several examples in which this approach is applied and worked out. For the examples given, we provide the analysis and the results following the worked-out approach. Analysis of the envisaged experimental set-up is done with linear and nonlinear mixed models in which variance components are estimated by restricted maximum-likelihood estimators.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Frank Van Der Meulen
Dr. Van der Meulen is an Assistent Professor at Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics (Delft University of Technology). His e-mail adress is [email protected].
Henk De Koning
Dr. De Koning is an associate consultant with A.T. Kearney. His e-mail address is [email protected].
Jeroen De Mast
Dr. de Mast is a principal consultant at IBIS UvA, and Associate Professor at the University of Amsterdam. He is a senior member of ASQ. His email address is [email protected].