Publication Cover
Journal of Quality Technology
A Quarterly Journal of Methods, Applications and Related Topics
Volume 56, 2024 - Issue 1
204
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correction

Correction

This article refers to:
Design and properties of the predictive ratio cusum (PRC) control charts

Article title: Design and properties of the predictive ratio cusum (PRC) control charts.

Authors: Bourazas, K., Sobas, F., & Tsiamyrtzis, P.

Journal: Journal of Quality Technology

Bibliometrics: Volume 55, Number 4, pages 404–421

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2022.2161435

The R-code in the Supplementary Materials that produced had a minor issue; an updated version can be found under the Supplementary Materials for the original article and is also available via the R-package “bayespm” on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bayespm/). As a result, and the obtained FWER in Section 5 of the article have been updated.

Figure 7. Predictive ratio cusum (PRC) for normal data. At the top panel, the data are plotted, while at the lower panel, we provide the PRC control chart focused on detecting an upward or downward mean step change of on standard deviation size, when we a FWER = 5% for 21 observations.

Figure 7. Predictive ratio cusum (PRC) for normal data. At the top panel, the data are plotted, while at the lower panel, we provide the PRC control chart focused on detecting an upward or downward mean step change of on standard deviation size, when we a FWER = 5% for 21 observations.

The corrections are as follows:

Page 416:

  • h+ = 3.882” has been updated to “h+ = 3.749”

  • h = −3.882” has been updated to “h = −3.749.”

  • FWER = 5%” has been updated to “FWER = 10%”

  • FWER = 2.5%” has been updated to “FWER = 5%”

Page 417:

  • has been replaced with an updated graphic.

  • FWER = 5%” has been updated to “FWER = 10%” in the caption for .

The original version of and the corresponding text are preserved below:

“We derive the decision limit h+ = 3.882 (h = −3.882) to achieve FWER = 5% for 21 observations (because we run two tests we used Bonferroni’s adjustment resulting FWER = 2.5% for each of the PRCs).”

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.