1,527
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EMPIRICAL ARTICLES

Descriptive and Injunctive Social Norm Overestimation in Hooking Up and Their Role as Predictors of Hook-Up Activity in a College Student Sample

&
Pages 84-94 | Published online: 15 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

This study examined the presence of norm overestimation in both injunctive and descriptive norms about hooking up. An online survey was completed by 186 college students (127 women). Overestimation was examined for hooking up as a global category, as well as for six specific behaviors. The role of norms in predicting hooking up was also examined using hierarchical multiple regression analyses. The predictive role of sensation-seeking, sociosexual orientation, self-esteem, and alcohol drinking status was also examined. Injunctive norm overestimation was present for less intimate behaviors (kissing and non-genital touching); only women showed overestimation for more intimate behaviors (genital touching, receiving oral sex, giving oral sex, and intercourse). Descriptive norms were overestimated across the board. Injunctive norms were poor predictors of behavior. Descriptive norms were good predictors only for less intimate behaviors, a pattern similar to that observed for drinking status. Ultimately, participants' level of personal comfort was the best predictor of participation in the most intimate behaviors, including oral sex and sexual intercourse.

Notes

Note. Relationship status (current): 1 = in relationship, 2 = not in relationship. Sex: 1 = male, 2 = female. Others' comfort represents perceived injunctive norm. Others' frequency represents perceived descriptive norm. Alcohol use status scale is an inverted scale with 1 = heavy drinker and 5 = abstainer.

*p ≤ .05. **p ≤ .01. ***p ≤ .001.

*p ≤ .05. **p ≤ .01.

Note. Relationship status (current): 1 = in relationship, 2 = not in relationship. Sex: 1 = male, 2 = female. Others' comfort represents perceived injunctive norm. Others' frequency represents perceived descriptive norm.

*p ≤ .05. **p ≤ .01. ***p ≤ .001.

Note. All correlations are significant at p < .001.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 165.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.