2,037
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effect of ewe size and nutritional regimen beginning in early pregnancy on ewe and lamb performance to weaning

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 203-212 | Received 06 Jun 2008, Accepted 02 Apr 2009, Published online: 23 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

Ewe size, pregnancy nutrition and pregnancy rank are known to affect the productive performance of ewes and their offspring. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two nutritional regimens, from day 21 to day 140 of pregnancy, in singleton‐ and twin‐bearing ewes of two different mean weights, taken from a single flock. The study included Large ewes offered Ad lib (Large‐Ad lib, n= 151), Large ewes offered Maintenance (Large‐Maintenance, n = 153), Small ewes offered Ad lib (Small‐Ad lib, n = 155) and Small ewes offered Maintenance (Small‐Maintenance, n = 153) that were either singleton‐ or twin‐bearing. During the period day 21 to day 140 Maintenance and Ad lib feeding regimens included Large and Small ewes and singleton‐ and twin‐bearing ewes. At days 1 and 140 of pregnancy Large ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) and of greater (P < 0.05) body condition than Small ewes. Similarly, at days 1 and 140 of pregnancy twin‐bearing ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than single‐bearing ewes. At day 1 of pregnancy there was no difference in ewe liveweight and body condition scores between Maintenance and Ad lib‐fed ewes, but by day 140 ewes in the Ad lib regimen were heavier (P < 0.05) and had greater (P < 0.05) body condition than Maintenance ewes. There was an interaction (P < 0.05) between ewe nutritional regimen and lamb birth rank for lamb birth weight such that twin lambs born to Maintenance regimen ewes were lighter (P < 0.05) than their counterparts born to Ad lib ewes (4.52 ± 0.06 versus 5.23 ± 0.06 kg respectively). This relationship was not observed in singletons. There was also an interaction (P < 0.05) between ewe size and nutritional regimen for lamb birthweight. Birth weights did not differ between lambs born to either Small or Large ewes on the Ad lib feeding regimen. However, lambs born to Small ewes on the Maintenance feeding regimen were lighter (P < 0.05) than their counterparts born to Large ewes (5.09 ± 0.07 versus 5.37 ± 0.07 kg respectively). At day 100 of lactation lambs born to Large ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than those born to Small ewes (32.65 ± 0.37 versus 31.16 ± 0.35 kg respectively) and those born to Ad lib ewes were heavier (P < 0.05) than those born to Maintenance ewes (32.77 ± 0.37 versus 31.03 ± 0.36 kg respectively). This study shows that level of dam pregnancy nutrition has a greater effect on twin‐born lambs than their singleton‐born counterparts. Furthermore, the data suggests that the heavier liveweights at weaning of lambs born to Large ewes may not have compensated for their dams’ greater nutritional requirements compared to their smaller counterparts.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.