250
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Fertiliser and soil science

Effect of cobalt application on the cobalt status of pastures 3. Comparison of chelate and sulphate as cobalt sources for topdressing deficient pastures

Pages 313-317 | Received 30 Nov 1989, Accepted 23 Mar 1990, Published online: 28 Nov 2012
 

Abstract

Cobalt chelate (Co EDTA) and cobalt sulphate (CoSO4), applied in liquid and solid forms, were compared as sources of cobalt (Co) for topdressing pasture at a site located within a paddock where grazing lambs responded to vitamin B12 injection. The two materials were equally effective in increasing pasture Co concentration but the effects from both lasted only about 100 days. Rate of application of both materials affected the maximum pasture Co concentration obtained but did not greatly influence the duration of the response. There was a small advantage at first from the liquid form but it did not persist. It is concluded that Co EDTA is no better than CoSO4 and because of its high relative cost it cannot be recommended for topdressing pastures. There is a need for a slow-release source of Co that will maintain pasture Co concentration at an adequate level for lambs for much of the grazing season but until such material becomes available a recommendation on a more effective use of CoSO4 is made.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.