2,954
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Evidence for the effects of land use on freshwater ecosystems in New Zealand

, , , &
Pages 551-591 | Received 24 Aug 2019, Accepted 15 Nov 2019, Published online: 02 Dec 2019

ABSTRACT

To meet the challenges of preventing and reversing adverse effects of land use on ecosystems, management actions need to be founded on strong evidence. We used the pressure-state-impact (PSI) framework to assess evidence of land-use effects on New Zealand freshwater ecosystems. The evidence consisted of published quantitative and categorical associations linking land-use pressures to state changes and ecological impacts in rivers, lakes and aquifers. There was substantial evidence of land-use effects, particularly where land use/land cover (LULC) classes were used as pressure variables. Proportions of catchment area in urban and pastoral LULC were consistently, positively correlated with contaminant levels in water bodies and negatively correlated with ecological-health indicators. Other consistent PSI associations included positive correlations between cattle stocking rates and river contaminant levels, increased fine sediment and decreased ecological-health scores in rivers following forest harvest, and increased river contaminant levels at sites with stock access. Despite these consistent associations, the evidence base has four general shortcomings that should be addressed: (1) inadequate integration of data and models that link land use and contaminant loss to state changes and impacts in freshwater ecosystems; (2) weak inferences based on LULC; (3) reliance on categorical PSI associations; (4) gaps in reported PSI associations.

Introduction

Land areas used for agricultural, forestry, and urban (commercial, residential, industrial, transport) purposes are major sources of exogenous sediment and nutrients in freshwater environments in New Zealand (Basher Citation2013; Dymond et al. Citation2013, Citation2016). While soils and nutrients are valuable resources on land, they are stressors in aquatic ecosystems when input rates exceed natural assimilative capacities and cause water-quality degradation. In turn, these changes in environmental state cause proliferations of phytoplankton and benthic algae, loss of sensitive species, and other ecological impacts (Biggs Citation2000; Schallenberg and Sorrell Citation2009; Reid et al. Citation2011). In addition to ecological impacts, degraded environmental state has negative impacts on cultural and socio-economic values such as customary harvests, contact recreation and food safety (Donnison et al. Citation2009; Harmsworth et al. Citation2011; McBride et al. Citation2012).

Preventing degradation of aquatic ecosystems by land-derived stressors and reversing degradation where it has already occurred are among the greatest challenges in environmental management. Meeting these challenges requires management actions and policies such as setting limits on contaminant losses. The most effective management actions and polices are based on predictive relationships that link land use, stressor levels in receiving environments, and the impacts of those stressors on ecological and socio-economic values (Snelder et al. Citation2004; Clapcott et al. Citation2011; Schallenberg et al. Citation2017). These relationships are needed to identify land-use intensity levels beyond which stressor levels are excessive and ecological values are degraded, and to forecast the impacts of future land-use change (Larned and Schallenberg Citation2019). There is widespread acknowledgement of the need for evidence-based environmental management and policies, where the evidence consists of or includes stressor-response relationships (Hill and Arnold Citation2012; Norris et al. Citation2012; Nichols et al. Citation2017).

Relationships that link land uses to stressor levels in receiving environments, and stressor levels to ecological impacts are presumed to form ordered sequences of causally connected relationships or ‘causal chains’ (Walmsley Citation2002; Odada et al. Citation2004). However, most reports of land-use effects on aquatic ecosystems are limited to bivariate relationships and categorical associations between land uses and stressors or between stressors and impacts, without consideration of causal chains. In rare cases, path analyses and simulation models have provided evidence of causal chains by coupling land use-stressor relationships and stressor-impact relationships in multiple-step sequences (e.g. Greenwood et al. Citation2012; Villeneuve et al. Citation2018). While these sequential approaches are improvements on single bivariate relationships, they invariably omit steps such as stressor attenuation between source areas and receiving environments. Despite the missing steps, the land use–stressor–impact sequence is useful for conveying information about land-use effects and for risk assessments.

The land use–stressor–impact sequence corresponds closely to the ‘pressure-state-impact’ (PSI) framework, which is widely used to guide policy development, impact assessments and management responses (Walmsley Citation2002; Oesterwind et al. Citation2016). The PSI framework is also used for environmental reporting in New Zealand, as required by the Environmental Reporting Act 2015 (MFE Citation2019; PCE Citation2019). We used the PSI framework in this study to assess published evidence about land-use effects.

Weaknesses and gaps in the evidence of land-use effects on aquatic ecosystems are impediments to environmental policy development and implementation in New Zealand (Duncan Citation2014, Citation2017; Rouse and Norton Citation2017; PCE Citation2019). In this paper, we assessed the current evidence of land-use effects in New Zealand rivers, lakes and aquifers based on an assessment of >100 published papers and technical reports. We identified major weaknesses and gaps and set out recommendations for strengthening the evidence base.

Land use, land cover and land management practices as pressures

Although land-use pressures are frequently investigated in New Zealand, the term ‘land use’ is not always defined explicitly. Instead, it is used to refer to a wide range of activities and spatial characteristics and is often used interchangeably with ‘land cover’ and ‘land management practice’. Where they are distinguished, land use (LU) describes the purpose for which a land parcel is used (e.g. urban residential, dairy farming), land cover (LC) describes observable features on the land surface (e.g. exotic grassland, plantation forest), and land management practice (LMP) refers to activities and inputs and outputs used to achieve a given land use (e.g. fertiliser application, clear-fell harvesting) (ACLUMP Citation2010; Verburg et al. Citation2011).

LU and LC are closely related variables; both concern the types and spatial distribution of vegetation and structures on land, and analyses of both are based on classification systems that assign areal cover or spatially dominant-use classes to land parcels, map polygons or catchments (Jansen and Gregorio Citation2002; Rutledge et al. Citation2009; Verburg et al. Citation2009). The most recent national LC database for New Zealand is the Land Cover Database (LCDB), based on satellite imagery from the summers of 1996/97, 2001/02, 2008/09, and 2012/13 (https://lris.scinfo.org.nz). The most recent national LU databases for New Zealand are the Land Use and Carbon Analysis System (LUCAS) and Land Use New Zealand (LUNZ) (Manderson et al. Citation2018). Both databases incorporate data from the LCDB and Agribase, a national spatial farms database. The classifications used for LCDB, LUCAS and LUNZ are broadly overlapping, and some classes (e.g. planted forest) are common to all three. Many studies of land-use effects in New Zealand have used combinations of LU and LC classes as pressure variables. In this review, we pooled studies based on LU and/or LC classes into a single group, LULC.

In contrast to LULC, there are no standard procedures for classifying LMPs in New Zealand. In the absence of standard procedures, we grouped LMPs into three broad classes: agricultural, forestry and urban.

Mitigation systems and strategies to prevent or reduce contaminant loss (e.g. stock exclusion, deferred effluent irrigation) may be considered LMPs, as they affect contaminant input to, and ecological impacts in, aquatic receiving environments. Mitigation systems were excluded from this review, as their use in New Zealand has been reviewed recently (e.g. Van Roon Citation2011; McDowell, Monaghan et al. Citation2018; McDowell, Schallenberg et al. Citation2018). However, some mitigation studies were used to infer land-use effects in the absence of mitigation. For example, information about the effects of livestock access to rivers was inferred from published comparisons of river conditions with and without stock access.

Methods

We used the PSI framework to organise and assess evidence. As used here, ‘pressures’ in the PSI framework are levels of land-use activities or the areal extent of land use or land cover, ‘states’ are levels of stressors in aquatic environments, and ‘impacts’ are responses in ecological, cultural and socio-economic values to changes in state levels. In this study, state variables were dominated by physical–chemical variables such as sediment and nutrient concentrations and impact variables were dominated by ecological and human health-related variables such as macroinvertebrate abundance, faecal bacteria concentration, and metrics used as indicators of ecological health (e.g. lake trophic state).

Google Scholar and Web of Science searches were used to locate published papers and publicly available technical reports dated after 1975. We screened the searches for publications that contained quantitative or categorical PSI associations in New Zealand. These publications included observational studies and process-based and statistical models that were set up and run for New Zealand locations. Quantitative associations were based on bivariate relationships between continuous variables, most of which were characterised using correlation or regression analyses. Categorical relationships were based on differences between the levels of state and impact variables in different LULC or LMP classes and between different ‘treatments’ (e.g. upstream and downstream of a land-use activity).

We focused on three classes of freshwater receiving environments (rivers, lakes and aquifers) and five classes of land-derived contaminants (nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sediment, metals, faecal bacteria). Associations between metals and land use were limited to urban centres and adjacent rural areas due to data shortages for other areas. Other land-derived contaminants such as pesticide residues were excluded due to data shortages. We excluded hydrological alterations as a land-use pressure because water abstraction for agricultural and urban land use has been poorly quantified in New Zealand (Booker Citation2018).

We considered wastewater management practices that involve land-application (e.g. land-disposal of municipal sewage effluent) to be LMPs and included reports concerning these practices. We excluded reports of point-source effluent discharges to aquatic receiving environments (e.g. direct discharge of effluent and stormwater to rivers and lakes), as the land involved is limited to that used for wastewater treatment plants and other infrastructure.

Quantitative assessments of the consistency of results in the compiled reports (e.g. meta-analyses) were not undertaken due to high variability in study designs and insufficient numbers of reports for some combinations of receiving environments and pressure, state and impact variables. In contrast, numerous reports had correlations between proportions of agricultural and urban land cover and river state and impact variables. High consistency in correlation direction across these reports made meta-analyses unnecessary.

Results

Rivers

We first summarise PSI associations between LULC classes and river contaminants and ecological impacts, then PSI associations between LMPs and river contaminants and impacts. The evidence we compiled concerning rivers came from both multi-site studies and single-site case studies. Case studies have limited use for making broad inferences about land-use effects; we only considered case studies when no multi-site or large-scale reports were available for a given PSI association.

LULC classes

Associations between LULC classes and state and impact variables are scale-dependent and the studies of New Zealand rivers reflect this dependence. Analyses of LULC-river associations have been based on spatial LULC data for the catchment areas upstream of sampling sites and for riparian zones of varied width and length (). Association strength at catchment and riparian scales have been compared in several studies (e.g. Buck et al. Citation2004; Burrell et al. Citation2014). LULC variables have been used both as continuous predictors in correlation analyses, and as categorical predictors in comparisons between LULC classes. In the latter cases, sites were assigned to LULC classes based on the spatially dominant class in the catchment or on rules that reflect the disproportionate effects of different LULC classes (e.g. Snelder and Biggs Citation2002).

Table 1. New Zealand studies of associations between land use/land cover (LULC) and state and impact variables in rivers. Abbreviations: TN – total nitrogen, NO3-N – nitrate nitrogen, NH4-N – ammoniacal nitrogen, TP – total phosphorus, DRP – dissolved reactive phosphorus, SS – suspended sediment, EPT – Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera, MCI – macroinvertebrate community index, QMCI – quantitative MCI, IBI – index of biological integrity, UCI – urban community index, QUCI – quantitative UCI.

LULC in upstream catchments

Correlations between proportions of catchment LULC classes and contaminant levels in rivers have been reported periodically for almost 30 years (). The spatial extent of these correlations ranged from single catchments to multiple catchments distributed across New Zealand. The reported correlations were highly consistent: concentrations and loads of total N (TN), total P (TP), nitrate-N (NO3-N) and dissolved reactive P (DRP) were positively correlated with pastoral, urban and planted-forest land cover, and negatively correlated with natural (i.e. native forest, scrub, tussock) land cover. Differences in correlation directions for planted forest cover and native forest cover may be related to soil disturbance during forestry rotations, or to legacy nutrients from previous agricultural land use and the high TP concentrations in the central North Island volcanic geology where the majority of planted forests are located (Julian et al. Citation2017).

In national studies that included Escherichia coli (E. coli) and other faecal bacteria, bacterial concentrations were positively correlated with pastoral and urban land cover (). In most of the national studies that included ecological impact variables (e.g. macroinvertebrate community metrics), the impact variables were negatively correlated with urban and pastoral land cover, and positively correlated with natural land cover (e.g. Quinn and Hickey Citation1990; Larned et al. Citation2016, Citation2019).

Several national assessments of associations between LULC and fish metrics were based on data from the New Zealand Freshwater Fish Database (). Jowett and Richardson (Citation2003) reported a mixture of positive and negative correlations between native fish densities and proportional land cover (e.g. shortfin eel and common bully densities were negatively correlated with native forest cover and positively correlated with pastoral land cover; koaro and banded kokopu densities were positively correlated with native forest cover and negatively correlated with pastoral land cover). Crow et al. (Citation2014) reported that the probabilities of occurrence of three out of 31 fish species were positively correlated with native forest cover. Joy and Death (Citation2004) reported that values of a fish-based index of biotic integrity differed systematically among some land-cover classes; index values at native-forest dominated sites were 15%–20% higher than at urban and pasture-dominated sites.

Urban land cover and impervious cover (i.e. urban cover consisting of concrete, asphalt and roofs) have been associated with contaminants and ecological metrics in streams in New Zealand’s major urban centres (Gadd Citation2016, Citation2019; ). These analyses were carried out separately from other national analyses because data characterising impervious surfaces and some contaminants (e.g. copper, zinc) are limited to urban centres. The analyses indicated that dissolved zinc and copper concentrations were positively correlated with urban land cover, and dissolved zinc and ammoniacal N (NH4-N) concentrations were positively correlated with impervious cover. No other statistically significant correlations were detected, due in part to high between-site variation within urban centres.

LULC-river associations have been assessed in several regional investigations. Most of these investigations used macroinvertebrate-community metrics (hereafter ‘macroinvertebrate metrics’) to assess land use impacts (). For brevity, we summarise associations between LULC and macroinvertebrate metrics in Waikato Region streams, where Collier and colleagues have surveyed streams across a wide range of catchment conditions. In these streams, multiple macroinvertebrate metrics (e.g. percent of invertebrates from the insect orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (%EPT), macroinvertebrate community index (MCI)) were positively correlated with natural land cover and negatively correlated with pastoral land cover (Collier Citation2008; Death and Collier Citation2010). Thresholds were evident in some plots of macroinvertebrate metrics versus natural land cover, indicating rapid declines in % EPT and MCI scores as natural land cover decreased from 100% to 80% and from 60% and 0% (Collier and Hamer Citation2010). These non-linear relationships suggest that the ecological health of streams is resistant to minor losses in native land cover, but degrades rapidly with decreasing natural land-cover below a land-cover threshold.

The remaining references in reported associations between LULC and river state and ecological impact variables in single- and multiple-catchment studies. These associations have been a focal issue at the Whatawhata Research Centre, which encompasses several Waipa River subcatchments (see references in ). In the Whatawhata studies, stream NO3-N, NH4-N and TN concentrations were higher and DRP concentrations and visual clarity were lower in catchments dominated by pasture and planted forest compared with native forest-dominated catchments. Native fish densities and biomass and median E. coli concentrations were higher and macroinvertebrate metrics were lower in the pasture-dominated catchments compared with the planted-forest and native -forest dominated catchments.

The Motueka River catchment has also been used to identify associations between LULC variables and water quality (Young et al. Citation2005), ecological conditions (Shearer and Young Citation2011) and cultural health (Harmsworth et al. Citation2011). In the water quality study, NO3-N, TN, E. coli and Campylobacter concentrations were higher at pasture- and horticulture-dominated sites than at native forest and planted forest sites. In the ecology study, MCI scores and proportions of macroinvertebrate detritivores were higher at native forest sites than at pasture or planted forest sites.

The study by Harmsworth et al. (Citation2011) is noteworthy as it was the first to link land use to Māori cultural values in rivers. Results of the study included a positive correlation between cultural stream health measure (CSHM) scores and native forest land cover. CSHM is a metric for evaluating river health based on cultural indicators such as clarity, suitability for swimming and cultural harvests (Tipa and Teirney Citation2006).

Several monitoring studies in individual urban centres reported associations between catchment LULC and contaminant levels and ecological impacts. Gadd and Sykes (Citation2014) reported that stream sediment zinc, copper and lead concentrations at 35 sites in the Avon River, Christchurch were positively correlated with impervious cover in the upstream catchment. Allibone et al. (Citation2001) reported that three macroinvertebrate metrics in Auckland streams were negatively correlated with impervious cover in the upstream catchment. Stansfield (Citation2016) reported that, across 19 stream sites in the Henderson and Huruhuru Stream catchments in Auckland, NO3-N, E. coli, and metals concentrations were highest and macroinvertebrate metric scores lowest at urban sites. Concentrations of the same contaminants were lowest and macroinvertebrate metric scores highest at planted forest sites; all state and impact variables were intermediated at pastoral sites.

LULC in riparian zones

Catchments with contrasting patterns of riparian-zone and upland LULC (e.g. grassland-dominated catchments with forested riparian zones) have been used in nested studies to compare the strengths of associations between LULC and river conditions based on catchment LULC versus riparian LULC (). In two nested studies, catchment LULC explained more variation in stream contaminant concentrations and invertebrate metrics than riparian LULC (Buck et al. Citation2004; Death and Collier Citation2010). Burrell et al. (Citation2014) reported that instream metabolism was positively correlated with catchment-scale agricultural cover and negatively correlated with riparian-scale forest cover; in this study, high primary production in streams with low riparian cover and high agricultural catchment cover was symptomatic of nutrient-driven eutrophication. Eikaas et al. (Citation2005) reported that the distribution of the migratory galaxid Galaxias brevipinnis was positively correlated with catchment forest cover, but only at sites with intact riparian forest.

Collier and Clements (Citation2011) compared the strengths of correlations between four macroinvertebrate metrics in Hamilton City streams and impervious land cover at multiple spatial scales: 30-, 50- and 100-m wide corridors along stream segments and networks, and in entire catchments. In this study, all metric scores decreased with increasing impervious cover at all spatial scales, and impervious cover in 50- and 100-m wide corridors was a stronger predictor of two metrics than catchment-scale impervious cover.

In lieu of a nested design, Harding et al. (Citation2006) compared macroinvertebrate communities and water quality in three riparian land-cover classes (pastoral, native forest fragments, continuous native forest). Sites with continuous native riparian zones had lower water temperatures and higher macroinvertebrate metric scores than sites with pastoral and native fragment riparian zones.

Land management practices

Most of the New Zealand reports with associations between LMP variables and river state and impact variables used one of three categorical designs: comparisons of river conditions before and after LMP occurrence (e.g. before and after fertiliser application); comparisons of sites upstream and downstream of LMPs (e.g. upstream and downstream of irrigation return flows); and comparisons of catchments with different LMPs in effect (e.g. forest harvest with and without riparian buffers).

Agricultural LMPs

The agricultural LMPs that have been associated with state variables in New Zealand rivers fall into four general classes: stocking rates, stock access to rivers, fertiliser use and water irrigation (). We located no reports of associations between river conditions and some widespread agricultural LMPs that are likely to affect river ecosystems (e.g. soil tillage, winter forage, land application of dairy effluent). All of the reports that we located concerned associations between agricultural LMPs and river state variables; none included ecological impacts in rivers. Most of the evidence in concerns improved and unimproved pastoral agriculture; there was little evidence concerning horticulture and other non-pastoral agricultural sectors.

Table 2. New Zealand studies of associations between agricultural land management practices and state and impact variables in rivers. Abbreviations: NRWQN – National River Water Quality Network, SS – suspended sediment. See for additional abbreviations.

Stocking rate

Correlations between stocking rates and river contaminant levels have been reported in a study of two Otago catchments and a study of the catchments above the 77 monitoring sites in the National River Water Quality Network (NRWQN) (). Stocking rates in the Otago catchments were positively correlated with river TN, NH4-N and TP concentrations and turbidity (Buck et al. Citation2004). In the NRWQN study, stocking rate was positively correlated with river TN, NO3-N, TP, DRP concentrations and turbidity (Julian et al. Citation2017).

Stock access

N, P and faecal bacteria inputs to rivers from stock defecation have been estimated using faecal production rates and bacterial, N and P concentrations in faecal material (Collins et al. Citation2007; Bagshaw et al. Citation2008; Dymond et al. Citation2016). These inputs have been estimated at reach- (Muirhead et al. Citation2011) and catchment-scales (Dymond et al. Citation2016) (). The effects of stock crossing on river contaminant concentrations and loads were measured directly by Davies-Colley et al. (Citation2004). In that study, a dairy herd crossing a river caused E. coli, SS and TN concentrations to increase by 400%, 54% and 10%, respectively, and water clarity to decrease by 10% ().

In the remaining stock-access studies, the effects of stock access were inferred from comparisons of river state and impact variables with and without stock access, or before and after stock exclusion. In a comparison of Southland streams with and without stock access, most sites with stock access had less shade, higher seasonal temperature variation, higher periphyton biomass, and lower macroinvertebrate metric scores (Quinn et al. Citation1992). In a second study at Whatawhata, water clarity increased in three streams after stock exclusion, but DRP and NO3-N concentrations also increased (Hughes and Quinn Citation2014). The increases in DRP and NO3-N concentrations were attributed to reduced instream N and P uptake due to increased riparian shade, and to reduced N and P retention due to afforestation of seepage wetlands.

The effects of deer access to headwater streams have been investigated at two Otago deer farms. NO3-N, NH4-N, TP, SS and E. coli concentrations in these streams were significantly higher during deer-wallowing periods compared with deer-free periods, under all flow conditions (McDowell Citation2007). In a subsequent study at one of the farms, mean annual NO3-N, NH4-N, TP, DRP, SS and E. coli loads measured during a period when deer accessed a stream were 78%–98% higher than when deer were excluded (McDowell Citation2008).

Fertiliser use

We located a single report linking agricultural fertiliser use to river state (). In this study, McDowell et al. (Citation2010) compared DRP and TP loads in the outlet streams of catchments that had been top-dressed with two forms of P fertiliser in alternate years: superphosphate and reactive phosphate rock. Over the four-year study, the use of high-solubility superphosphate was associated with higher instream DRP and TP loads than low-solubility rock phosphate.

Water irrigation

Runoff and drainage following irrigation in excess of soil-water capacity are well-studied in New Zealand (e.g. Carey et al. Citation2004). However, the direct effects of irrigation return flows on river state and ecological impacts are rarely measured. Return flows from spray irrigation to rivers is usually via groundwater and diffused, which makes the effects of irrigation on river conditions difficult to detect (Baalousha Citation2009). In contrast, flood and border-dyke irrigation with drainage across the land-surface and spray irrigation leading to saturation-excess runoff lend themselves to comparisons of river conditions upstream and downstream of return-flow sites. Wilcock et al. (Citation2011) and McDowell and Kitto (Citation2013) compared contaminant concentrations at paired sites upstream and downstream of return-flows on five Otago streams. In most of these streams, N, P and E. coli concentrations were higher at the downstream site ().

Forestry LMPs

Typical planted forest rotations comprise six general LMPs: land preparation, tree planting, thinning and pruning, fertilisation, weed and pest control, and harvesting, which includes road building, felling, yarding and transport (Maclaren Citation1993). With the exception of weed and pest control, effects of each LMP on New Zealand rivers have been reported in at least one publication. The single report on effects of land preparation concerned afforested low-gradient wetlands; we found no reports linking impacts to the effect of land preparation on hillslopes, where most plantation forestry occurs in New Zealand. The lack of information about effects of hillslope land preparation is a concern, as this LMP class includes several activities that accelerate sediment and nutrient transport to surface water (Aust and Blinn Citation2004).

Land preparation

In the single study of effects of land preparation, Collier et al. (Citation1989) compared stream chemistry and macroinvertebrate communities in Westland streams, where pakahi wetland had been cleared and drained, with control streams (). Streams in the cleared and drained areas were more acidic and had higher aluminium concentrations and lower invertebrate taxon richness than control streams. Results from a follow-up study eight years later indicated that macroinvertebrate communities in the cleared and drained sites were similar to those in control streams (Harding et al. Citation2000).

Table 3. New Zealand studies of associations between forestry land management practices and state and impact variables in New Zealand rivers. See and for abbreviations.

Planting

In the single study of effects of forestry planting on river conditions, Hughes and Quinn (Citation2019) monitored water quality in two Whatawhata subcatchments before and after first-rotation planting. Median NO3-N, TN, DRP and TP concentrations in the streams draining one of the catchments were significantly higher 3-years after planting than in the pre-planting period (). As in their previous Whatawhata study (Hughes and Quinn Citation2014), the authors attributed the increased N and P concentrations to reduced instream N and P uptake due to increased riparian shade, and reduced N and P retention in wetlands after afforestation.

Fertiliser application

Two reports on the effects of planted forest fertilisation on New Zealand stream water quality were based on forest blocks fertilised with urea and/or superphosphate (Leonard Citation1977; Neary and Leonard Citation1978). In-stream N and P concentrations increased by as much as two orders of magnitude in the first 1–3 days after fertiliser application, but returned to baseline levels within two months (). As is the case for agricultural land, fertiliser leaching losses from planted forests have been measured, but not linked to state changes or impacts in aquatic ecosystems (Davis et al. Citation2012).

Thinning

The Whatawhata study by Hughes and Quinn (Citation2019) was the only report located with associations between tree thinning and stream conditions (). In that study, stream NO3-N and TN concentrations increased for three years after thinning in three planted catchments, and DRP and TP concentrations increased after thinning in one catchment These changes were attributed to reduced soil N and P uptake after tree density was reduced.

Harvesting

Clear-fell harvesting is considered the forestry LMP with the greatest potential for adverse effects on rivers; it is also the most common harvesting method in New Zealand planted forests (Maclaren Citation1993). Clear-felling can cause soil destabilisation, accelerate sediment input to streams, reduce soil nutrient uptake, add logging slash to channels, and alter stream light and thermal conditions. In addition to harvested areas, forestry roads and landings are sources of eroded sediment (Fransen et al. Citation2001; Marden et al. Citation2006). The effects of alternative methods such as selective logging may be less severe than clear-felling, but are limited to native forestry in New Zealand (Hawes and Memon Citation1998).

In , forest harvesting by clear-felling to stream margins is distinguished from clear-felling with riparian buffers retained. In several studies, clear-felling to stream margins led to increased solar insolation and water temperatures, and decreased daily average and minimum dissolved oxygen concentrations (Collier and Bowman Citation2003; Baillie et al. Citation2005; Quinn and Wright-Stow Citation2008). Increased solar radiation and post-harvest nutrient pulses also led to increased periphyton abundance after riparian clear-felling (Boothroyd et al. Citation2004; Thompson et al. Citation2009; Reid et al. Citation2010). In a comparative study of forest harvest effects in Whangapoua Forest, Coromandel Peninsula, stream reaches where trees were felled to the margin had higher light levels, higher bank erosion and periphyton biomass, fewer banded kokopu (Galaxius fasciatus) and lower macroinvertebrate-metric values than reaches with riparian buffers (Rowe et al. Citation2002; Boothroyd et al. Citation2004; Quinn et al. Citation2004).

In four of the five studies that compared instream N and P measurements before and after harvesting, and in harvested and unharvested catchments, N and P concentrations increased during post-harvest periods ranging from four-months to two-years (Graynoth Citation1979, Collier and Bowman Citation2003; Thompson et al. Citation2009; Hughes and Quinn Citation2019). In contrast, Fahey and Stansfield (Citation2006) reported that difference in stream N, P, SS and faecal bacteria concentrations before and 2–10 years after 85% of a forested catchment was clear-felled were statistically undetectable.

Comparisons of sediment yields in harvested and unharvested catchments and in pre- and post-harvest periods indicate that hillslope sediment losses increase after harvest, then decline to pre-harvest levels two to six years after replanting (Fahey and Marden Citation2006; Basher et al. Citation2011; Quinn and Phillips Citation2016). Elevated sediment yield is generally accompanied by increased instream SS concentrations and fine deposited sediment cover (Graynoth Citation1979; Collier and Bowman Citation2003; Basher et al. Citation2011; ). The time-courses of sediment yield and instream sediment levels following harvesting vary with local storm intensity and timing, and connectivity between sediment source areas and stream channels (Kamarinas et al. Citation2016).

Multiple assessments of ecological impacts of forest harvesting have been based on comparisons of macroinvertebrate communities before and after harvest and between harvested and unharvested areas (). Collectively, these studies indicate that macroinvertebrate communities at sites where forests were clear-felled to stream margins have high proportions of stress-tolerant taxa (e.g. midges, snails, segmented worms), increased total invertebrate abundance, and reduced ecological-health scores. In a subset of these studies, sites that were clear-felled to stream margins were compared to clear-felled sites with intact riparian buffers and to unharvested sites (Harding et al. Citation2000; Quinn et al. Citation2004; Reid et al. Citation2010). Macroinvertebrate community structure and ecological-health scores at harvested sites with intact buffers were more similar to those at unharvested sites than to those at sites that were clear-felled to the margins.

The study by Collier and Smith (Citation2005) is notable because it is one of the few studies of forest harvest effects with continuous relationships between harvesting and its effects. In that study, % catchment area harvested was negatively correlated to %EPT density and positively correlated with elmid beetle density and % silt cover on stream beds ().

Two studies of the effects of forest harvesting on freshwater fish were located (). The first reported that long-finned eel and dwarf inanga abundances were lower in a clear-felled forest stream than in an unharvested control stream; this study also reported a brown-trout kill and attributed it to hypoxia following clear-felling (Graynoth Citation1979). In the second study, redfin bully abundance was higher at harvested sites with riparian buffers than at unharvested sites, and banded kokopu abundance was higher at harvested sites with riparian buffers than at harvested sites without buffers. Long-finned and short-finned eel abundance did not vary significantly between harvesting methods (Rowe et al. Citation2002).

Urban LMPs

We located two studies that reported associations between urban LMPs and state and impact variables in rivers. The first study concerned land-application of municipal sewage effluent from the city of Rotorua in planted forest as an alternative to direct discharge to Lake Rotorua (Tomer et al. Citation2000). The forested catchment used for effluent application drains to Waipa Stream, a tributary of Lake Rotorua. Data from six years (1991–1997) of monitoring effluent N and P concentrations, effluent application rates, and Waipa Stream flows and N and P loads were used to estimate the loss of N and P to the stream. On average, 17% of the N and 2% of the P applied to land were exported; these exports increased the N and P loads of Waipa Stream by approximately 64% and 30%, respectively.

The second study concerned impacts of road use on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities (Shaver and Suren Citation2011). Macroinvertebrates were monitored upstream and downstream of six high-use state highway crossings in the Wellington and Auckland Regions. Contaminant runoff was not measured directly, but upstream-downstream differences were used to infer contaminant effects. Macroinvertebrate community composition and ecological health metrics were highly similar at most of the paired upstream-downstream sites, indicating that road runoff had generally weak effects on macroinvertebrates at these sites.

We found no published evidence of the effects of other urban LMPs that can affect river conditions, including earthworks, landfill operations, and the use of zinc and copper-yielding roofs and guttering. A large proportion of the recent urban water-quality research in New Zealand concerns contaminant transport in urban infrastructure (e.g. sewage systems and stormwater drains). However, we excluded point-source discharges from sewage and stormwater outfalls from this review.

Lakes

Investigations of the effects of land-use on New Zealand lakes have focused almost entirely on N and P inputs and subsequent changes in lake state and impact variables. This focus reflects the risk of eutrophication posed by historical increases in catchment nutrient loading to lakes and widespread reports of phytoplankton proliferations and elevated trophic-level index (TLI) values (e.g. Drake et al. Citation2011; Smith et al. Citation2016; Schallenberg et al. Citation2017). In a recent analysis of monitored lakes across New Zealand, 60% of lakes were classed as eutrophic, based on median TLI > 4 (Larned, Snelder et al. Citation2018). Despite reports of elevated E. coli and SS in some New Zealand lakes (Hicks et al. Citation2013; Dada and Hamilton Citation2016), we found no published associations between land use and faecal bacteria or sediment in lakes. All reports that included associations between land use and lake state or impact variables were based on LULC variables; we found no studies that used LMPs to represent land use.

Eight studies reported continuously varying associations between LULC and lake state or impact variables (). In these reports, N and P concentrations in lake waters were positively correlated with catchment-scale pastoral, urban and impervious surface cover. In addition, TP concentrations were positively correlated with planted-forest cover in one study of 101 lakes (Abell et al. Citation2010).

Table 4. New Zealand studies of associations between land use/land cover (LULC) and state and impact variables in lakes. Abbreviations: TLI – trophic level index; Chl a – phytoplankton Chlorophyll-a concentration. See and for more abbreviations.

The ecological impact variables in New Zealand lake studies were phytoplankton concentration, TLI, ecological integrity (EI, a normative ecological-health indicator; Schallenberg et al. Citation2011), invertebrate and macrophyte taxon richness, and the probability of lake ‘regime shifts’ from clear-water, macrophyte-dominated conditions to turbid, phytoplankton-dominated conditions. In these studies, TLI scores were positively correlated with pastoral land cover and negatively correlated with native land cover, EI scores were positively correlated with native land cover, and the probability of lake regime shifts was positively correlated with pastoral land cover. Invertebrate and macrophyte taxon richness were negatively correlated with pastoral and impervious cover in lake catchments ().

The remaining reports in used nutrient budget methods to estimate N and P loads to lakes and partitioned those loads into LULC classes. In each case, the proportion of the total load originating from agricultural land exceeded the proportion of catchment area used for agriculture, even when point-source inputs were included.

Aquifers

Land-derived contaminants reach aquifers by multiple pathways, including deposition on the land surface and subsequent leaching, by-pass flow and river recharge (Close Citation1989; White et al. Citation2012; Cameron et al. Citation2013). In several contaminant-leaching studies, losses from plant root zones were equated with inputs to aquifers, but the contaminants were not directly measured in groundwater (e.g. Houlbrooke et al. Citation2004). Actual contaminant input to groundwater and changes in groundwater contaminant levels cannot be determined from root-zone losses alone due to attenuation, dispersion, and other processes (Stenger et al. Citation2008, Citation2012). Compared with rivers and lakes, we located few studies of New Zealand aquifers with associations between LULC or LMPs and groundwater state and/or impacts.

LULC classes

We located three reports with associations between LULC classes and groundwater contaminant levels or ecological variables (). In a study of DRP in National Groundwater Monitoring Programme (NGMP) wells distributed across New Zealand, McDowell et al. (Citation2015) reported that DRP concentrations were highest in anoxic groundwater below dairy-farms. In a study of groundwater NO3-N in NGMP wells in the Waikato Region, McLay et al. (Citation2001) reported that NO3-N concentrations were significantly higher in market-gardening areas compared with sheep and beef areas, and intermediate in areas dominated by other LULC classes. Boulton et al. (Citation1997) assessed associations between LULC classes and invertebrate communities in hyporheic zones (shallow groundwater beneath streambeds) at the Whatawhata Centre. Hyporheic invertebrate abundance and taxon richness were highest at sites in native forest-dominated catchments and lower at sites in planted-forest and pastoral catchments.

Table 5. New Zealand studies of associations between land use/land cover (LULC) and state and impact variables in New Zealand aquifers. NGMP: National Groundwater Monitoring Programme. See for more abbreviations.

In several analyses of groundwater state at NGMP sites, associations between LULC variables and groundwater state variables were tested but were not statistically significant (Daughney et al. Citation2012; Sirisena et al. Citation2013; Moreau and Daughney Citation2015). However, groundwater at approximately 40% of the NGMP sites appears to affected by unspecified human activities, as indicated by elevated NO3-N and sulfate concentrations (Daughney and Randall Citation2009; Moreau and Daughney Citation2015).

LMPs

The LMPs that have been associated with state changes and ecological impacts in New Zealand aquifers fall into six classes: land-application of municipal sewage effluent, septic tank operation, irrigation, land-application of agricultural effluent, fertiliser application and feedlot operation (). The state variables in these associations were limited to NO3-N and faecal bacteria concentrations and loads. Two reports included ecological impacts in aquifers, both based on groundwater invertebrate abundance and composition.

Table 6. New Zealand studies that report associations between land management practices and state and impact variables in aquifers. WWTP: wastewater treatment plant. See and for other abbreviations.

The most frequently studied associations between LMPs and groundwater NO3-N and faecal bacteria concern land-application of sewage effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and the use of land for residential septic-tank leachfields (). The primary aim of these studies was to assess risks of potable groundwater contamination. The WWTP studies were carried out at land-application sites in Canterbury where effluent is pumped from oxidation ponds to dyked paddocks, percolates to the water table, and is transported downgradient in groundwater flow. The effects of effluent input were assessed by comparing groundwater NO3-N and faecal bacteria concentrations in wells upgradient and downgradient of the disposal areas (Martin and Noonan Citation1977; Quin Citation1978). At both sites, mean downgradient NO3-N concentrations were elevated year-round. Downgradient faecal bacteria concentrations were elevated after heavy rains, and during dry periods when effluent was applied close to the downgradient wells. Tracer experiments indicated that water-supply wells needed to be separated from the land-application sites by up to 4 km to ensure adequate attenuation of faecal pathogens (Sinton et al. Citation2000, Citation2005). Ecological impacts of land-application of sewage effluent disposal were assessed using groundwater invertebrates (Sinton Citation1984; Hartland et al. Citation2011). Invertebrate diversity was reduced in the groundwater effluent plumes, but abundance was increased (), presumably due to food subsidies in the form of effluent organic matter.

In the septic-tank studies, data from drinking-water wells and a transport model were used to assess groundwater NO3-N and faecal bacteria contamination from the use of household septic tanks (Sinton Citation1982; Pang et al. Citation2006). The model indicated that NO3-N dilution by regional groundwater to background levels required a transport distance of nearly 3 km. Faecal bacteria contamination was more localised, due to rapid attenuation.

The remaining LMPs in concern agricultural practices. The effects of three water irrigation systems on faecal bacteria in groundwater have been measured at dairy farms. Under border-dyke irrigation, E.coli detections peaked following ‘high risk’ events when irrigation water occurred within a few days of stock grazing near monitoring wells (Close et al. Citation2008). A second study assessed effects of travelling and centre-pivot spray irrigation (Close et al. Citation2010). Under a travelling water irrigator, the flux of faecal coliforms to groundwater ranged from 4600 to 33,000 cfu m−2 after irrigation events. In contrast, E. coli and Campylobacter were rarely detected in groundwater after centre-pivot irrigation. The results of these three surveys suggest that centre-pivot irrigation with water minimises bacterial fluxes to groundwater, but the surveys also differed in well depths, irrigation rates, stocking rates, soil types and indicator bacteria.

Changes in groundwater NO3-N concentrations in response to fertiliser application, effluent application and feedlot operations have each been assessed in single cases studies (). In the fertiliser study, groundwater NO3-N concentrations increased with increasing urea application rates, after a lag time of 18–24 months (Ledgard et al. Citation1996). In the effluent study, groundwater NO3-N concentrations increased for 12 years after the commencement of dairy factory waste application on a Waikato farm (applied in each irrigation season from 1982 to 1994), but there was no clear relationship between temporal variation in application rates and groundwater NO3-N (Selvarajah et al. Citation1994). Instead, groundwater NO3-N fluctuated in response to rainfall recharge, as high recharge transported soil N to the water table. In the feedlot study, groundwater NO3-N was monitored upgradient and downgradient of a sheep feedlot while it was in operation and three years after it closed (Rosen Citation1996; Rosen et al. Citation2004). NO3-N in downgradient groundwater was very high (15–40 mg L−1) during the operating period and declined after closure, but remained elevated compared to upgradient concentrations. The effects of the feedlot were predicted to persist for a further 3–5 years after closure, as vadose-zone N was depleted.

Discussion

PSI associations are essential evidentiary tools for land and water management (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Citation2005; Larned and Schallenberg Citation2019). Examples of recent applications of PSI associations in New Zealand include the nitrogen allocation policy for the Lake Taupo catchment (Jenkins Citation2016) and the estimation of reference conditions for state and impact variables in New Zealand rivers and lakes (McDowell et al. Citation2013; Clapcott et al. Citation2017; Schallenberg Citation2019). Estimated reference conditions have been used for setting freshwater objectives under New Zealand’s resource management legislation and in regional land and water plans.

Ideally, strong evidence (i.e. accurate, mechanistic PSI associations) would be available for all aquatic ecosystems affected by land use. In reality, the observational data and/or modelling results needed to develop such relationships are limited to a small number of locations, and management plans and actions are usually based on weaker evidence. Weak evidence includes correlative PSI associations where causation is not clearly established and association-strength is low, and qualitative results from categorical comparisons (Suter et al. Citation2002; Cottingham et al. Citation2005; Rehme et al. Citation2011). The preponderance of weak evidence has led to guidance for its use in environmental management; the essential guidance is to compile PSI associations from multiple sources, then base management decisions on the most consistent associations (Downes et al. Citation2002; Norris et al. Citation2012; Schallenberg et al. Citation2017). Here, consistency refers to the degree to which PSI associations from different sites are consistent in direction (e.g. MCI scores decline after forest clear-felling at multiple study sites). Consistent PSI associations can be distilled from the preceding summaries.

Consistent associations

In multiple studies, proportions of upstream catchment area with agricultural and urban land-cover were positively correlated with contaminant concentrations and loads in rivers and lakes, and negatively correlated with trophic-, macroinvertebrate- and fish-based ecosystem health metrics ( and ). In contrast to the high consistency, association strength tends to be low for PSI associations based on proportional land-cover (i.e. correlation coefficients tend to be <0.5). Two general reasons for low association strength are: (1) simple correlations do not account for multivariate interactions; and (2) land cover is an imprecise proxy for the LMPs that generate and transfer contaminants to aquatic receiving environments. Single land-cover classes often encompass a wide range of LMPs (Bai et al. Citation2008; Verburg et al. Citation2009). The utility of land cover as a proxy for LMPs is considered further below.

Several agricultural and forestry LMPs were consistently associated with increased contaminant levels in rivers and aquifers. Among the agricultural LMPs, cattle and deer access to rivers was associated with increased N, E. coli and suspended sediment concentrations, irrigation return flows were associated with increased downstream N and P concentrations, and stocking rates were positively correlated with river N and P concentrations and turbidity.

Faecal bacteria input to land from cattle and N input to land from livestock and fertiliser have been associated with elevated bacterial and N concentrations in downgradient groundwater in multiple studies, but contaminant input and groundwater responses are decoupled by transient storage in unsaturated zones; effects in groundwater may only be apparent after recharge events mobilise and transport contaminants to the water table (Close et al. Citation2008, Citation2010).

Clear-fell harvesting in plantation forests is one of the most frequently studied LMPs in New Zealand river science. Collectively, these studies indicate that clear-felling to stream margins leads to increased deposited fine sediment, SS concentrations and loads, water temperature and light levels at stream surfaces, and decreased macroinvertebrate-based ecosystem-health metrics. The adverse effects indicated by macroinvertebrate metrics persisted for 1–8 years after harvesting, depending on catchment size and the presence of riparian buffers. In cases where riparian buffers were retained, adverse effects were consistently reduced (Boothroyd et al. Citation2004; Quinn et al. Citation2004; Quinn and Wright-Stow Citation2008; Reid et al. Citation2010).

Despite the consistent associations listed above, shortcomings remain in the evidence base for New Zealand land-use effects. In the remainder of this section, we discuss four major shortcomings and approaches to overcome them: (1) inadequate integration of data and models to link land use and contaminant loss to impacts and state changes in aquatic environments; (2) weak inferences based on LULC classes; (3) reliance on categorical PSI associations; and (4) gaps in PSI associations.

Inadequate integration of data and models to link land use and contaminant loss to impacts and state changes in aquatic environments

There is a large body of research in New Zealand focused on quantifying contaminant losses from land via surface runoff, leaching and soil erosion (e.g. Aislabie et al. Citation2001; Quine et al. Citation2003; Monaghan et al. Citation2007, Citation2009; Hoogendoorn et al. Citation2011). It is frequently stated in these reports that the contaminant losses affect conditions in freshwater receiving environments, but data from the receiving environments are rarely included, which precludes PSI associations. This approach, where losses are measured but inputs and responses in receiving environments are assumed, is particularly prominent in studies of agricultural LMPs like fertiliser use, livestock grazing and tillage. There is also a large body of research in New Zealand focused on responses to contaminants in aquatic ecosystems (e.g. Abell et al. Citation2010; Reid et al. Citation2011; Ramezani et al. Citation2014). Many of the latter papers refer to, but do not incorporate, land use and contaminant loss data. These uncoupled studies reflect the challenges of research that accounts for the entire causal chain from land use to ecological impacts in aquatic ecosystems (Brook and Blomqvist Citation2016). Despite the challenges, fully integrated empirical studies and models are needed to ensure that land-based policies and management actions achieve their intended effects in receiving environments. Recent progress has been made to address this challenge in New Zealand, using coupled models to link land-use, contaminant loss and transport to aquatic receiving environments, and effects on water quality, periphyton, phytoplankton and macroalgae (Trolle et al. Citation2014; Elliott et al. Citation2016; Kamarinas et al. Citation2016; McBride and Hamilton Citation2017; Me et al. Citation2018).

Weak inferences based on LULC classes

Although the PSI framework is useful for organising information, and its focus on bivariate relationships reflects the approach used in most New Zealand studies, it has limitations. One limitation is the lack of distinction between direct PSI associations (i.e. causal relationships between pressure and state or impact variables) and indirect PSI associations (i.e. pressure variables are correlated with state and impact variables, but are not the proximate causes of change). Many of the PSI associations in this review are indirect; this is most evident in associations that use LULC classes as pressure variables. For example, agricultural and urban land cover has been correlated with water quality and ecological responses in numerous studies, but land cover per se is not the proximate cause of those responses. Instead, land cover is a proxy for a wide range of activities that affect contaminant losses (Verburg et al. Citation2009). As proxy variables, LULC classes permit only weak inferences about changes in aquatic systems, and weak inferences may be too unreliable for policy makers and managers (Allan Citation2004; Rehme et al. Citation2011). In contrast, direct PSI associations generally come from site-specific, controlled studies of causal variables and their effects (e.g. Davies-Colley et al. Citation2004; Matthaei et al. Citation2006). Despite their increased reliability, these site-specific PSI associations are difficult to generalise for policy-making.

Between the extremes of large-scale, weak inferences based on LULC classes and small-scale, strong inferences from controlled studies are correlative PSI associations that use LMPs as pressure variables. As LMPs represent activities that can generate and mobilise contaminants on land, they are more directly linked to responses in receiving environments than LULC classes, and are better able to provide reliable, scalable PSI associations (Erb et al. Citation2017). Shifting from the current reliance on LULC classes to LMPs could improve the assessment and prediction of land-use effects in freshwater ecosystems in New Zealand. We recognise that many of these ecosystems are affected by multiple land-derived stressors, which are in turn associated with multiple LMPs (Matthaei and Piggott Citation2019). In addition to shifting to LMPs as pressure variables, a shift in data analysis and reporting approaches is needed, from the current focus on single stressors in PSI associations to a more realistic focus on multiple stressors (Larned and Schallenberg Citation2019).

There are some impediments to compiling and using LMP data in New Zealand, including limited data access for privacy protection and a lack of standard procedures for characterisation and classification (Statistics New Zealand Citation2017). However, New Zealand LMP inventories have been developed and standard procedures are under investigation (MacLeod and Moller Citation2006; Manderson et al. Citation2018). These recent advances have focused on agricultural LMPs; comparable advancements are also needed for urban and forestry LMPs.

Reliance on categorical PSI associations

Most of the PSI associations summarised in were based on categorical comparisons between LULC and LMP classes (e.g. natural versus pastoral land-cover, harvested versus unharvested forest catchments). A smaller set of PSI associations were based on correlations using LULC or LMP gradients (e.g. percent impervious surface area, percent of forest area harvested). Continuous correlations based on gradient more informative than categorical associations as they characterise progressive changes in state and impact over the observed pressure gradients, and they can be used for interpolation and for identifying pressure thresholds (Cottingham et al. Citation2005; Kreyling et al. Citation2018). In contrast, the information from categorical comparisons is limited to inter-class differences. When continuous data are available to characterise LULC and LMPs, then categorical analyses are unnecessary simplifications. Given that most categorical and quantitative PSI associations permit only weak inferences about land-use effects, researchers should develop the most informative, albeit correlative, PSI associations possible. To do so, we recommend shifting from categorical to continuous associations.

Gaps in PSI associations

In addition to the methodological shortfalls discussed above, there are combinations of land use pressures and environmental responses for which there are few or no reliable PSI associations. In the remainder of this discussion, we identify some high-priority shortages in PSI associations, based in part on a recent gap analysis (Larned, Booker et al. Citation2018). Four general shortages were identified in that analysis: (1) PSI associations based on LMPs were lacking in studies of New Zealand lakes; (2) PSI associations linking LMPs to state and impact variables in rivers and urban streams are limited to a narrow range of LMPs, particularly at regional and national scales; (3) PSI associations of all forms are very scarce for aquifers; (4) for many widespread LMPs, PSI associations are lacking for all receiving environments.

Widespread LMPs for which no published PSI associations were located include soil tillage, winter grazing on forage crops, fertiliser use on horticultural and cropping land, earthworks, landfill operations, and the use of pesticides, other organic toxicants and veterinary pharmaceuticals. Widespread LMPs for which only one or two small-scale case studies have been reported include fertiliser use on pastoral land and planted forests, land application of livestock effluent, forestry land preparation, and road use. These rare case studies are not amenable to assessments of consistent associations as noted above.

Of all freshwater receiving environments in New Zealand, aquifers are the least studied in terms of PSI associations. While it is certain that aquifers are receiving environments for land-derived contaminants, few PSI associations have been reported, and large-scale data analyses have not yielded detectable correlations between LULC variables and groundwater state variables (Daughney et al. Citation2012; Moreau and Daughney Citation2015). There are several reasons for the insidious effects of land use on groundwater: capture zones are unknown for most monitoring sites; contaminant losses from land and groundwater responses are decoupled by long lag times and distances; and the effects of aquifer geochemistry, recharge and other factors mask land-use effects. The most expedient ways to improve our ability to link land-pressures to groundwater state and impacts may be delineating capture zones in national and regional groundwater monitoring networks, and advancing groundwater contaminant models that can integrate the resulting land use and groundwater data (e.g. Bidwell and Good Citation2007).

Concluding remarks

In this review, we assessed the evidence for land-use effects on freshwater ecosystems set out in over 100 New Zealand studies. Despite the multitude of studies, the evidence base is not comprehensive and is dominated by weak inferences, which are typical of observational studies (Downes et al. Citation2002; Norris et al. Citation2012). The most consistently observed PSI associations involved proxy land-use variables (e.g. proportional land cover) that were associated with state and impact variables by correlation or categorical comparisons. The limitations of these approaches are discussed in the preceding section. The consequences of weak inferences are: (1) uncertainty about the causes of observed degradation; (2) uncertainty about the degree to which land-use effects are reversible; and (3) uncertainty about the effects of future land-use changes. These uncertainties limit the utility of the existing evidence to guide environmental policy-making and management actions (Suter et al. Citation2002; Adams Citation2003).

Uncertainty about causes of degradation poses risks that management actions will target pressures that have little effect on the impacts of concern. For example, negative correlations between agricultural land-cover and ecological health metrics often have multiple proximate causes (e.g. nutrient enrichment, sedimentation, flow alteration) that vary in their strength of association with the response metric (Riseng et al. Citation2011; Schmidt et al. Citation2018). Management actions aimed at reducing nutrient losses and loads are unlikely to be effective at sites where flow alteration is the dominant stressor. In other cases, associations between land-use pressures and state or impact variables are spurious (i.e. both the pressure and response variables are causally related to a third variable, but not to each other). Management actions based on spurious associations are also unlikely to be effective (Garsd Citation1984; Suter et al. Citation2002; Adams Citation2003).

Uncertainty about the degree to which land-use effects are reversible poses risks that reducing the causal land-use pressure or pressures will not elicit the intended improvement in environmental conditions. For example, many lakes that have been degraded by excessive nutrient loading failed to recover when nutrient loads were reduced (Jeppesen et al. Citation2005; Hilt et al. Citation2018). Resistance to recovery when the causal stressor is reduced is indicative of stabilising feedback in degraded ecosystems, such as competitive exclusion of lake macrophytes by phytoplankton (Larned and Schallenberg Citation2019). In these cases, management interventions in addition to reduced land-use pressures are required.

Preventing adverse impacts of land use before they occur is one of the fundamental aims of freshwater policies in New Zealand (Duncan Citation2014; Rouse and Norton Citation2017). To achieve that aim, the effects of land-use change on receiving environments must be predicted in advance (e.g. Trolle et al. Citation2014). However, the combination of uncertainty about causation and reversibility impedes the prediction of future land-use effects.

The New Zealand government recently set out a strategic plan to ensure that the evidence base needed to inform environmental policy is fit for purpose (MFE Citation2017). Our assessment indicates that this objective, as it applies to land-use effects on freshwater ecosystems, has not yet been achieved. However, strengthening the evidence base as recommended here can reduce uncertainty and increase confidence about the outcomes of policies and management.

Acknowledgements

We thank Clive Howard-Williams, Ross Monaghan, John Quinn and Ton Snelder for interminable discussions and helpful manuscript reviews.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Our Land and Water National Science Challenge, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [grant number C10X1507].

References

  • Abell JM, Özkundakci D, Hamilton DP. 2010. Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of phytoplankton growth in New Zealand lakes: implications for eutrophication control. Ecosystems. 13:966–977.
  • [ACLUMP] Australian Collaborative Land Use Mapping Program. 2010. Status of land management practices. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra.
  • Adams SM. 2003. Establishing causality between environmental stressors and effects on aquatic ecosystems. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 9:17–35.
  • Aislabie J, Smith JJ, Fraser R, McLeod M. 2001. Leaching of bacterial indicators of faecal contamination through four New Zealand soils. Soil Research. 39:1397–1406.
  • Allan JD. 2004. Influence of land use and landscape setting on the ecological status of rivers. Limnetica. 23:87–197.
  • Allibone R, Horrox J, Parkyn S. 2001. Stream classification and instream objectives for Auckland’s urban streams. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report TR 2008/002.
  • Aust WN, Blinn CR. 2004. Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: an overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002). Water Air and Soil Pollution. 4:5–36.
  • Baalousha H. 2009. Stochastic water balance model for rainfall recharge quantification in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand. Environmental Geology. 58:85–93.
  • Bagshaw CS, Thorrold B, Davison M, Duncan IJH, Mathews LR. 2008. The influence of season and of providing a water trough on stream use by beef cattle grazing hill-country in New Zealand. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 109:155–166.
  • Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME. 2008. Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use and Management. 24:223–234.
  • Baillie BR, Collier KJ, Nagels J. 2005. Effects of forest harvesting and woody debris removal on two Northland streams, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 39:1–15.
  • Ballantine DJ, Davies-Colley RJ. 2014. Water quality trends in New Zealand rivers: 1989–2009. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 186:1939–1950.
  • Basher LR. 2013. Erosion processes and their control in New Zealand. In: Dymond JR, editor. Ecosystem services in New Zealand – conditions and trends. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press; p. 363–374.
  • Basher LR, Hicks DM, Clapp B, Hewitt T. 2011. Sediment yield response to large storm events and forest harvesting, Motueka River, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 45:333–356.
  • Bidwell VJ, Good JM. 2007. Development of the AquiferSim model of cumulative effect on groundwater of nitrate discharge from heterogeneous land use over large regions. In: Oxley L, Kulasiri D, Larned Scott, editors. MODSIM 2007. modelling and simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. Christchurch, New Zealand; p. 1617–1622.
  • Biggs BJ. 2000. Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 19:17–31.
  • Booker DJ. 2018. Quantifying the hydrological effect of permitted water abstractions across spatial scales. Environmental Management. 62:334–351.
  • Boothroyd IK, Quinn JM, Langer EL, Costley KJ, Steward G. 2004. Riparian buffers mitigate effects of pine plantation logging on New Zealand streams: 1. riparian vegetation structure, stream geomorphology and periphyton. Forest Ecology and Management. 194:199–213.
  • Boulton AJ, Scarsbrook MR, Quinn JM, Burrell GP. 1997. Land-use effects on the hyporheic ecology of five small streams near Hamilton, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 31:609–622.
  • Brook BW, Blomqvist L. 2016. Innovations and limits in methods of forecasting global environmental change. Basic and Applied Ecology. 17:565–575.
  • Bruesewitz DA, Hamilton DP, Schipper LA. 2011. Denitrification potential in lake sediment increases across a gradient of catchment agriculture. Ecosystems. 14:341–352.
  • Buck O, Niyogi DK, Townsend CR. 2004. Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. Environmental Pollution. 130:287–299.
  • Burrell TK, O'Brien JM, Graham SE, Simon KS, Harding JS, McIntosh AR. 2014. Riparian shading mitigates stream eutrophication in agricultural catchments. Freshwater Science. 33:73–84.
  • Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL. 2013. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Annals of Applied Biology. 162:145–173.
  • Carey PL, Drewry JJ, Muirhead RW, Monaghan RM. 2004. Potential for nutrient and faecal bacteria losses from a dairy pasture under border-dyke irrigation: a case study. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 66:141–149.
  • Clapcott JE, Goodwin EO, Snelder TH, Collier KJ, Neale MW, Greenfield S. 2017. Finding reference: a comparison of modelling approaches for predicting macroinvertebrate community index benchmarks. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 51:44–59.
  • Clapcott J, Young R, Goodwin E, Leathwick J, Kelly D. 2011. Relationships between multiple land-use pressures and individual and combined indicators of stream ecological integrity. New Zealand Department of Conservation Research and Development Series 326.
  • Close ME. 1989. Effects of septic tank effluent on chemical quality of alluvial gravel aquifers. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 23:275–286.
  • Close M, Dann R, Ball A, Pirie R, Savill M, Smith Z. 2008. Microbial groundwater quality and its health implications for a border-strip irrigated dairy farm catchment, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Water and Health. 6:83–98.
  • Close ME, Davies-Colley R. 1990. Baseflow water chemistry in New Zealand rivers 2. Influence of environmental factors. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 24:343–356.
  • Close M, Noonan M, Hector R, Bright J. 2010. Microbial transport from dairying under two spray-irrigation systems in Canterbury, New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Quality. 39:824–833.
  • Collier KJ. 2008. Temporal patterns in the stability, persistence and condition of stream macroinvertebrate communities: relationships with catchment land-use and regional climate. Freshwater Biology. 53:603–616.
  • Collier KJ, Bowman EJ. 2003. Role of wood in pumice-bed streams I: impacts of post-harvest management on water quality, habitat and benthic invertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management. 177:243–259.
  • Collier KJ, Clements BL. 2011. Influences of catchment and corridor imperviousness on urban stream macroinvertebrate communities at multiple spatial scales. Hydrobiologia. 664:35–50.
  • Collier KJ, Hamer MP. 2010. Spatial and temporal patterns in the condition of Waikato streams based on the Regional Ecological Monitoring of Streams (REMS) Programme. Environment Waikato Regional Council Technical Report 2010/04.
  • Collier KJ, Olsen AR. 2013. Monitoring network-design influence on assessment of ecological condition in wadeable streams. Marine and Freshwater Research. 64:146–156.
  • Collier KJ, Smith BJ. 2005. Effects of progressive catchment harvesting on stream invertebrates in two contrasting regions of New Zealand’s North Island. Marine and Freshwater Research. 56:57–68.
  • Collier KJ, Winterbourn MJ, Jackson RJ. 1989. Impacts of wetland afforestation on the distribution of benthic invertebrates in acid streams of Westland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 23:479–490.
  • Collins R, Mcleod M, Hedley M, Donnison A, Close M, Hanly J, Horne D, Ross C, Davies-Colley R, Bagshaw C, Matthews L. 2007. Best management practices to mitigate faecal contamination by livestock of New Zealand waters. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 50:267–278.
  • Cooper AB, Thomsen CE. 1988. Nitrogen and phosphorus in streamwaters from adjacent pasture, pine and native forest catchments. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 22:279–291.
  • Cottingham KL, Lennon JT, Brown BL. 2005. Knowing when to draw the line: designing more informative ecological experiments. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 3:145–152.
  • Crow SK, Booker DJ, Sykes JRE, Unwin M, Shankar U. 2014. Predicting distributions of New Zealand freshwater fishes. Department of Conservation. NIWA Client Report CHC2014-145.
  • Dada AC, Hamilton DP. 2016. Predictive models for determination of E. coli concentrations at inland recreational beaches. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 227:347.
  • Daughney CJ, Raiber M, Moreau-Fournier M, Morgenstern U, van der Raaij R. 2012. Use of hierarchical cluster analysis to assess the representativeness of a baseline groundwater quality monitoring network: comparison of New Zealand’s national and regional groundwater monitoring programs. Hydrogeology Journal. 20:185–200.
  • Daughney C, Randall M. 2009. National groundwater quality indicators update: state and trends 1995-2008. GNS Science Report 2009/145.
  • Davies-Colley RJ, Nagels JW, Smith RA, Young RG, Phillips CJ. 2004. Water quality impact of a dairy cow herd crossing a stream. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 38:569–576.
  • Davis M, Coker G, Watt M, Graham D, Pearce S, Dando J. 2012. Nitrogen leaching after fertilising young Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management. 280:20–30.
  • Death RG, Baillie B, Fransen P. 2003. Effect of Pinus radiata logging on stream invertebrate communities in Hawke's Bay, NewZealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 37:507–520.
  • Death RG, Collier KJ. 2010. Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? Freshwater Biology. 55:1447–1464.
  • Dodd MB, Thorrold BS, Quinn JM, Parminter TG, Wedderburn ME. 2008. Improving the economic and environmental performance of a New Zealand hill country farm catchment: 1. Goal development and assessment of current performance. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 51:127–141.
  • Donnison A, Ross C, Dixon L. 2009. Faecal microbial contamination of watercress (Nasturtium officinale) gathered by a Maori protocol in New Zealand streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 43:901–910.
  • Donnison A, Ross C, Thorrold B. 2004. Impact of land use on the faecal microbial quality of hill-country streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 38:845–855.
  • Downes BJ, Barmuta LA, Fairweather PG, Faith D, Keough MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP. 2002. Monitoring ecological impacts: concepts and practice in flowing waters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drake DC, Kelly D, Schallenberg M. 2011. Shallow coastal lakes in New Zealand: current conditions, catchment-scale human disturbance, and determination of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia. 658:87–101.
  • Duncan R. 2014. Regulating agricultural land use to manage water quality: the challenges for science and policy in enforcing limits on non-point source pollution in New Zealand. Land Use Policy. 41:378–387.
  • Duncan R. 2017. The challenges of regulating diffuse agricultural pollution to improve water quality. Case Studies in the Environment. 2017:1–7.
  • Dymond JR, Ausseil AG, Parfitt RL, Herzig A, McDowell RW. 2013. Nitrate and phosphorus leaching in New Zealand: a national perspective. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 56:49–59.
  • Dymond JR, Serezat D, Ausseil AGE, Muirhead RW. 2016. Mapping of Escherichia coli sources connected to waterways in the Ruamahanga catchment, New Zealand. Environmental Science and Technology. 50:1897–1905.
  • Eikaas HS, McIntosh AR, Kliskey AD. 2005. Catchment-and site-scale influences of forest cover and longitudinal forest position on the distribution of a diadromous fish. Freshwater Biology. 50:527–538.
  • Elliott S, Wadhwa S, Whitehead A, Snelder T, Muirhead R, Monaghan RM, Bright J. 2016. Modelling national land-use capacity: exploring bottom lines and headroom under the NPS-FM 2014. Update Report. NIWA Report 2016103HN.
  • Erb KH, Luyssaert S, Meyfroidt P, Pongratz J, Don A, Kloster S, Kuemmerle T, Fetzel T, Fuchs R, Herold M, Haberl H. 2017. Land management: data availability and process understanding for global change studies. Global Change Biology. 23:512–533.
  • Fahey BD, Marden M. 2006. Forestry effects on sediment yield and erosion. In: Eyles G, Fahey BD, editor. The Pakuratahi land use study. Napier: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council; p. 51–62.
  • Fahey BD, Stansfield B. 2006. Forestry effects on water quality. In: Eyles G, Fahey BD, editor. The Pakuratahi land use study. Napier: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council; p. 63–74.
  • Fransen PJB, Phillips CJ, Fahey BD. 2001. Forest road erosion in New Zealand: overview. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 26:165–174.
  • Gadd J. 2016. Urban streams water quality state and trends. Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report AKL. 2016–018.
  • Gadd J. 2019. Urban river and stream water quality state and trends 2008-2017. Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report 2018328AK.
  • Gadd J, Sykes J. 2014. Avon River sediment survey. NIWA Client Report AKL2014-004.
  • Galbraith LM, Burns CW. 2007. Linking land-use, water body type and water quality in southern New Zealand. Landscape Ecology. 22:231–241.
  • Garsd A. 1984. Spurious correlation in ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling. 23:191–201.
  • Graynoth E. 1979. Effects of logging on stream environments and faunas in Nelson. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 13:79–109.
  • Greenwood MJ, Harding JS, Niyogi DK, McIntosh AR. 2012. Improving the effectiveness of riparian management for aquatic invertebrates in a degraded agricultural landscape: stream size and land-use legacies. Journal of Applied Ecology. 49:213–222.
  • Hamill KD, McBride GB. 2003. River water quality trends and increased dairying in Southland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 37:323–332.
  • Hamilton D, Hamilton M, McBride C. 2006. Nutrient and water budget for Lake Tarawera. Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research Report 46. University of Waikato, Hamilton.
  • Harding JS, Claassen K, Evers N. 2006. Can forest fragments reset physical and water quality conditions in agricultural catchments and act as refugia for forest stream invertebrates? Hydrobiologia. 568:391–402.
  • Harding JS, Quinn JM, Hickey CW. 2000. Effects of mining and production forestry. In: Collier KJ, Winterbourn MJ, Larned Scott, editors. New Zealand stream invertebrates: ecology and implications for management. Hamilton, New Zealand: New Zealand Limnological Society; p. 230–259.
  • Harmsworth GR, Young RG, Walker D, Clapcott JE, James T. 2011. Linkages between cultural and scientific indicators of river and stream health. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 45:423–436.
  • Hartland A, Fenwick GD, Bury SJ. 2011. Tracing sewage-derived organic matter into a shallow groundwater food web using stable isotope and fluorescence signatures. Marine and Freshwater Research. 62:119–129.
  • Hawes P, Memon PA. 1998. Prospects for sustainable management of indigenous forests on private land in New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Management. 52:113–130.
  • Hicks BJ, McCaughan HMC. 1997. Land use, associated eel production, and abundance of fish and crayfish in streams in Waikato, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 31:635–650.
  • Hicks BJ, Stichbury GA, Brabyn LK, Allan MG, Ashraf S. 2013. Hindcasting water clarity from Landsat satellite images of unmonitored shallow lakes in the Waikato region, New Zealand. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 185:7245–7261.
  • Hill D, Arnold R. 2012. Building the evidence base for ecological impact assessment and mitigation. Journal of Applied Ecology. 49:6–9.
  • Hilt S, Nuñez A, Marta M, Bakker ES, Blindow I, Davidson TA, Gillefalk M, Hansson LA, Janse JH, Janssen AB, Jeppesen E. 2018. Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9:194.
  • Hoogendoorn CJ, Betteridge K, Ledgard SF, Costall DA, Park ZA, Theobald PW. 2011. Nitrogen leaching from sheep-, cattle-and deer-grazed pastures in the Lake Taupo catchment in New Zealand. Animal Production Science. 51:416–425.
  • Houlbrooke DJ, Horne DJ, Hedley MJ, Hanly JA, Snow VO. 2004. A review of literature on the land treatment of farm-dairy effluent in New Zealand and its impact on water quality. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 47:499–511.
  • Hughes AO, Quinn JM. 2014. Before and after integrated catchment management in a headwater catchment: changes in water quality. Environmental Management. 54:1288–1305.
  • Hughes AO, Quinn JM. 2019. The effect of forestry management activities on stream water quality within a headwater plantation Pinus radiata forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 439:41–54.
  • Jansen LJM, Gregorio AD. 2002. Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 91:89–100.
  • Jenkins B. 2016. Sustainability analysis of the management approach for six New Zealand lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management. 32:101–115.
  • Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Jensen JP, Havens KE, Anneville O, Carvalho L, Coveney MF, Deneke R, Dokulil MT, Foy BOB, Gerdeaux D. 2005. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading–an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshwater Biology. 50:1747–1771.
  • Jowett IG, Richardson J. 2003. Fish communities in New Zealand rivers and their relationship to environmental variables. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 37:347–366.
  • Joy MK, Death RG. 2004. Application of the index of biotic integrity methodology to New Zealand freshwater fish communities. Environmental Management. 34:415–428.
  • Julian JP, de Beurs KM, Owsley B, Davies-Colley RJ, Ausseil AGE. 2017. River water quality changes in New Zealand over 26 years: response to land use intensity. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 21(2):1149–1171.
  • Kamarinas I, Julian J, Hughes A, Owsley B, de Beurs K. 2016. Nonlinear changes in land cover and sediment runoff in a New Zealand catchment dominated by plantation forestry and livestock grazing. Water. 8:436. doi:10.3390/w8100436.
  • Kreyling J, Schweiger AH, Bahn M, Ineson P, Migliavacca M, Morel-Journel T, Christiansen JR, Schtickzelle N, Larsen KS. 2018. To replicate, or not to replicate–that is the question: how to tackle nonlinear responses in ecological experiments. Ecology Letters. 21:1629–1638.
  • Kusabs I, Mitchell C. 2005. Impacts of forest harvesting on giant kokupu, Ngakaroa Stream, Omataroa Forest, Bay of Plenty. DOC Science Internal Series 199. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 20 p.
  • Lange K, Townsend CR, Gabrielsson R, Chanut PC, Matthaei CD. 2014. Responses of stream fish populations to farming intensity and water abstraction in an agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biology. 59:286–299.
  • Larned ST, Booker D, Dudley B, Moores J, Monaghan R, Baillie B, Schallenberg M, Moriarty E, Zeldis J, Short K. 2018. Land use impacts on freshwater and marine environments in New Zealand. Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report 2018127CH.
  • Larned ST, Schallenberg M. 2019. Stressor-response relationships and the prospective management of aquatic ecosystems. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 53(4):489–512. doi:10.1080/00288330.2018.1524388.
  • Larned ST, Snelder T, Unwin M, McBride G. 2016. Water quality in New Zealand rivers: current state and trends. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 50:389–417.
  • Larned ST, Snelder T, Whitehead A, Fraser C. 2018. Water quality state and trends in New Zealand lakes. Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report 2018359CH.
  • Larned ST, Whitehead A, Fraser C, Snelder T, Yang J. 2019. Water quality state and trends in New Zealand rivers. Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report 2018347CH.
  • Ledgard SF, Selvarajah N, Jenkinson D, Sprosen MS. 1996. Groundwater nitrate levels under grazed dairy pastures receiving different rates of nitrogen fertiliser. In: Currie LD, Longanthan P, editors. Occasional Report No.9. fertilizer and lime research centre. Palmerston North: Massey University; p. 229–236.
  • Leonard JH. 1977. Nitrogen runoff from a radiata pine forest fertilised with urea. New Zealand Journal of Forestry. 22:64–80.
  • Maclaren JP. 1993. Radiata pine grower’s manual. New Zealand Forest Research Institute Bulletin 184. 140 p.
  • MacLeod CJ, Moller H. 2006. Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 115:201–218.
  • Manderson A, Jolly B, Ausseil A-G. 2018. The New Zealand Land Use Classifier. Manaaki-Whenua Landcare Research Client Report LC3335.
  • Marden M, Rowan D, Phillips C. 2006. Sediment sources and delivery following plantation harvesting in a weathered volcanic terrain, Coromandel Peninsula, North Island. New Zealand. Soil Research. 44:219–232.
  • Martin GN, Noonan MJ. 1977. Effects of domestic wastewater disposal by land irrigation on groundwater quality of the Central Canterbury Plains. Water and Soil Technical Publication 7. New Zealand Ministry of Works and Development. 25 p.
  • Matthaei CD, Piggott JJ. 2019. Multiple stressors in Australia and New Zealand: key stressors and interactions. In: Sabater S, Elosegi A, Ludwing R, editors. Multiple stressors in river ecosystems. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 221–233.
  • Matthaei CD, Weller F, Kelly DW, Townsend CR. 2006. Impacts of fine sediment addition to tussock, pasture, dairy and deer farming streams in New Zealand. Freshwater Biology. 51:2154–2172.
  • McBride CG, Hamilton DP. 2017. Catchment and lake water quality modelling to assess management options for Lake Tutira. Environmental Research Institute Report 97. University of Waikato. 76 p.
  • McBride GB, Stott R, Papps D, Palliser C, Jenner G, Macdonald G. 2012. Estimating health risks to water users: marrying hydrodynamic models and risk models. Water Practice and Technology. 7(4):1–8.
  • McDowell RW. 2007. Water quality in headwater catchments with deer wallows. Journal of Environmental Quality. 36:1377–1382.
  • McDowell RW. 2008. Water quality of a stream recently fenced-off from deer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 51:291–298.
  • McDowell RW. 2009. Effect of land use and moisture on phosphorus forms in upland stream beds in South Otago, New Zealand. Marine and Freshwater Research. 60:619–625.
  • McDowell RW, Cox N, Daughney CJ, Wheeler D, Moreau M. 2015. A national assessment of the potential linkage between soil, and surface and groundwater concentrations of phosphorus. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 51:992–1002.
  • McDowell RW, Kitto JA. 2013. Assessment, modelling and management of land use and water quality in the upper Taieri River catchment. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 56:261–278.
  • McDowell RW, Littlejohn RP, Blennerhassett JD. 2010. Phosphorus fertilizer form affects phosphorus loss to waterways: a paired catchment study. Soil Use and Management. 26:365–373.
  • McDowell RW, Monaghan RM, Close ME, Tanner CC. 2018. Agricultural catchment restoration. In: Hamilton DP, et al., editor. Lake restoration handbook: a New Zealand perspective. Berlin: Springer; p. 107–127.
  • McDowell RW, Schallenberg M, Larned ST. 2018. A strategy for optimizing catchment management actions to stressor–response relationships in freshwaters. Ecosphere. 9(10):e02482.
  • McDowell RW, Snelder TH, Cox N, Booker DJ, Wilcock RJ. 2013. Establishment of reference or baseline conditions of chemical indicators in New Zealand streams and rivers relative to present conditions. Marine and Freshwater Research. 64:387–400.
  • McLay CDA, Dragten R, Sparling G, Selvarajah N. 2001. Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches. Environmental Pollution. 115:191–204.
  • Me W, Hamilton DP, McBride CG, Abell JM, Hicks BJ. 2018. Modelling hydrology and water quality in a mixed land use catchment and eutrophic lake: effects of nutrient load reductions and climate change. Environmental Modelling and Software. 109:114–133.
  • [MFE] Ministry for the Environment. 2017. Conservation and Environment Science Roadmap. Report ME1295.
  • [MFE] Ministry for the Environment, Statistics New Zealand. 2019. New Zealand’s Environmental Reporting Series: Environment Aotearoa 2019.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Monaghan RM, Carey PL, Wilcock RJ, Drewry JJ, Houlbrooke DJ, Quinn JM, Thorrold BS. 2009. Linkages between land management activities and stream water quality in a border dyke-irrigated pastoral catchment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 129:201–211.
  • Monaghan RM, Wilcock RJ, Smith LC, Tikkisetty B, Thorrold BS, Costall D. 2007. Linkages between land management activities and water quality in an intensively farmed catchment in southern New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 118:211–222.
  • Moore S, Neale M. 2008. Freshwater invertebrate monitoring: 2003–2007 analysis and evaluation. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report TR2008-010.
  • Moreau M, Daughney C. 2015. Update of national groundwater quality indicators: state and trends December 2004-2013. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2015/16.
  • Muirhead RW, Elliott AH, Monaghan RM. 2011. A model framework to assess the effect of dairy farms and wild fowl on microbial water quality during base flow conditions. Water Research. 45:2863–2874.
  • Neary DG, Leonard JH. 1978. Effects of forest fertilisation on nutrient losses in streamflow in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 8:189–205.
  • Nichols SJ, Peat M, Webb JA. 2017. Challenges for evidence-based environmental management: what is acceptable and sufficient evidence of causation? Freshwater Science. 36:240–249.
  • Niyogi DK, Koren M, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR. 2007. Stream communities along a catchment land-use gradient: subsidy-stress responses to pastoral development. Environmental Management. 39:213–225.
  • Norris RH, Webb JA, Nichols SJ, Stewardson MJ, Harrison ET. 2012. Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature. Freshwater Science. 31:5–21.
  • Odada EO, Olago DO, Kulindwa K, Ntiba M, Wandiga S. 2004. Mitigation of environmental problems in Lake Victoria, East Africa: causal chain and policy options analyses. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. 33:13–23.
  • Oesterwind D, Rau A, Zaiko A. 2016. Drivers and pressures–untangling the terms commonly used in marine science and policy. Journal of Environmental Management. 181:8–15.
  • Özkundakci D, Hamilton DP, Kelly D, Schallenberg M, de Winton M, Verburg P, Trolle D. 2014. Ecological integrity of deep lakes in New Zealand across anthropogenic pressure gradients. Ecological Indicators. 37:45–57.
  • Pang L, Nokes C, Šimůnek J, Kikkert H, Hector R. 2006. Modeling the impact of clustered septic tank systems on groundwater quality. Vadose Zone Journal. 5:599–609.
  • Parkyn SM, Collier KJ, Hicks BJ. 2002. Growth and population dynamics of crayfish Paranephrops planifrons in streams within native forest and pastoral land uses. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 36:847–862.
  • Paul WJ, Hamilton DP, Ostrovsky I, Miller SD, Zhang A, Muraoka K. 2012. Catchment land use and trophic state impacts on phytoplankton composition: a case study from the Rotorua lakes’ district, New Zealand. Hydrobiologia. 698:133–146.
  • [PCE] Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. 2006. Restoring the Rotorua Lakes: the ultimate endurance challenge. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
  • [PCE] Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. 2019. Focusing Aotearoa New Zealand’s environmental reporting system. https://www.pce.parliament.nz/publications/focusing-aotearoa-new-zealand-s-environmental-reporting-system.
  • Quin BF. 1978. The effects of drainage from surface irrigation with treated sewage effluent on groundwater quality at Templeton. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand). 17:91–102.
  • Quine TA, Basher LR, Nicholas AP. 2003. Tillage erosion intensity in the south Canterbury Downlands, New Zealand. Soil Research. 41:789–807.
  • Quinn JM, Boothroyd IK, Smith BJ. 2004. Riparian buffers mitigate effects of pine plantation logging on New Zealand streams: 2. invertebrate communities. Forest Ecology and Management. 191:129–146.
  • Quinn JM, Cooper AB, Davies-Colley RJ, Rutherford JC, Williamson RB. 1997. Land use effects on habitat, water quality, periphyton, and benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand, hill-country streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 31:579–597.
  • Quinn JM, Hickey CW. 1990. Characterisation and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 24:387–409.
  • Quinn JM, Phillips C. 2016. Production forestry. Chapter 24 In: Jellyman P, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS, editor. Advances in New Zealand freshwater science. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society Inc. and New Zealand Hydrological Society Inc.; p. 469–482.
  • Quinn JM, Stroud MJ. 2002. Water quality and sediment and nutrient export from New Zealand hill-land catchments of contrasting land use. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 36:409–429.
  • Quinn JM, Williamson RB, Smith RK, Vickers ML. 1992. Effects of riparian grazing and channelisation on streams in Southland, New Zealand. 2. Benthic invertebrates. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 26:259–273.
  • Quinn JM, Wright-Stow AE. 2008. Stream size influences stream temperature impacts and recovery rates after clearfell logging. Forest Ecology and Management. 256:2101–2109.
  • Ramezani J, Akbaripasand A, Closs GP, Matthaei CD. 2016. In-stream water quality, invertebrate and fish community health across a gradient of dairy farming prevalence in a New Zealand river catchment. Limnologica. 61:14–28.
  • Ramezani J, Rennebeck L, Closs GP, Matthaei CD. 2014. Effects of fine sediment addition and removal on stream invertebrates and fish: a reach-scale experiment. Freshwater Biology. 59:2584–2604.
  • Rehme SE, Powell LA, Allen CR. 2011. Multimodel inference and adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management. 92:1360–1364.
  • Reid DJ, Chiaroni LD, Hewitt JE, Lohrer DM, Matthaei CD, Phillips NR, Scarsbrook MR, Smith BJ, Thrush SF, Townsend CR, van Houte-Howes KS. 2011. Sedimentation effects on the benthos of streams and estuaries: a cross-ecosystem comparison. Marine and Freshwater Research. 62:1201–1213.
  • Reid DJ, Quinn JM, Wright-Stow AE. 2010. Responses of stream macroinvertebrate communities to progressive forest harvesting: influences of harvest intensity, stream size and riparian buffers. Forest Ecology and Management. 260:1804–1815.
  • Riseng CM, Wiley MJ, Black RW, Munn MD. 2011. Impacts of agricultural land use on biological integrity: a causal analysis. Ecological Applications. 21:3128–3146.
  • Rosen MR. 1996. Hydrogeology, water quality, and nitrate movement in the unconfined gravel aquifer beneath the Maraekakaho sheep feedlot, Hawke’s Bay. New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand). 35:28–49.
  • Rosen MR, Reeves RR, Green S, Clothier B, Ironside N. 2004. Prediction of groundwater nitrate contamination after closure of an unlined sheep feedlot. Vadose Zone Journal. 3:990–1006.
  • Rouse H, Norton N. 2017. Challenges for freshwater science in policy development: reflections from the science–policy interface in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 51:7–20.
  • Rowe DK, Chisnall BL, Deans TL, Richardson J. 1999. Effects of land-use on native fish communities in east coast streams of the North Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 33:141–151.
  • Rowe DK, Smith J, Quinn J, Boothroyd I. 2002. Effects of logging with and without riparian strips on fish species abundance, mean size, and the structure of native fish assemblages in Coromandel, New Zealand, streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 36:67–79.
  • Rutherford K, Chague-Goff C, McKerchar A. 2008. Nutrient load estimates for Lake Brunner. West Coast Regional Council NIWA Client Report HAM2008-060.
  • Rutledge DT, Price R, Briggs C, Cowell S. 2009. Geospatial land-use classification for New Zealand: review and recommendations. Official Statistics Research Series 4.
  • Schallenberg M. 2019. Determining the reference conditions for New Zealand lakes. Science for Conservation Series 334. New Zealand Department of Conservation. 46 p.
  • Schallenberg M, Death R, Clapcott J, MacNeil C, Young R, Sorrell B, Scarsbrook M, Kelly D. 2011. Approaches to assessing ecological integrity in New Zealand freshwaters. Science for Conservation Series 307. New Zealand Department of Conservation. 86 p.
  • Schallenberg M, Hamilton DP, Hicks AS, Robertson HA, Scarsbrook M, Robertson B, Wilson K, Whaanga D, Jones HFE, Hamill K. 2017. Multiple lines of evidence determine robust nutrient load limits required to safeguard a threatened lake/lagoon system. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 51:78–95.
  • Schallenberg M, Sorrell B. 2009. Regime shifts between clear and turbid water in New Zealand lakes: environmental correlates and implications for management and restoration. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 43:701–712.
  • Schmidt TS, Van Metre PC, Carlisle DM. 2018. Linking the agricultural landscape of the Midwest to stream health with structural equation modeling. Environmental Science & Technology. 53:452–462.
  • Selvarajah N, Maggs GR, Crush JR, Ledgard SF. 1994. Nitrate in ground water in the Waikato region. In: Currie LD, Loganathan P, editors. Occasional Report No. 7. Fertilizer and lime research centre. Palmerston North: Massey University; p. 160–185.
  • Shaver E, Suren A. 2011. Assessing impacts of state highway stormwater runoff on stream invertebrate communities. New Zealand Transport Authority report. www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/stormwater-management/docs/impacts-of-stormwater-runoff-on-stream-invertebrate.pdf.
  • Shearer KA, Young RG. 2011. Influences of geology and land use on macroinvertebrate communities across the Motueka River catchment, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 45:437–454.
  • Sinton LW. 1982. A groundwater quality survey of an unsewered, semirural area. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 16:317–326.
  • Sinton LW. 1984. The macroinvertebrates of a sewage-polluted aquifer. Hydrobiologia. 119:161–169.
  • Sinton LW, Braithwaite RR, Hall CH, Pang L, Close ME, Noonan MJ. 2005. Tracing the movement of irrigated effluent into an alluvial gravel aquifer. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 166:287–301.
  • Sinton LW, Noonan MJ, Finlay RK, Pang L, Close ME. 2000. Transport and attenuation of bacteria and bacteriophages in an alluvial gravel aquifer. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 34:175–186.
  • Sirisena KA, Daughney CJ, Moreau-Fournier M, Ryan KG, Chambers GK. 2013. National survey of molecular bacterial diversity of New Zealand groundwater: relationships between biodiversity, groundwater chemistry and aquifer characteristics. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 86:490–504.
  • Smith VH, Wood SA, McBride CG, Atalah J, Hamilton DP, Abell J. 2016. Phosphorus and nitrogen loading restraints are essential for successful eutrophication control of Lake Rotorua, New Zealand. Inland Waters. 6:273–283.
  • Snelder TH, Biggs BJF. 2002. Multiscale river environment classification for water resources management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 38:1225–1239.
  • Snelder TH, McDowell RW, Fraser CE. 2017. Estimation of catchment nutrient loads in New Zealand using monthly water quality monitoring data. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 53:158–178.
  • Snelder TH, Weatherhead M, Biggs BJF. 2004. Nutrient concentration criteria and characterization of patterns in trophic state for rivers in heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 40:1–13.
  • Stansfield B. 2016. Project Twin Streams current state report 1: freshwater. Auckland Council Report 16238. (knowledgeauckland.org.nz/publication/?mid=2868).
  • Statistics New Zealand. 2017. Agricultural land database matching and data integration: privacy impact assessment. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/agriculture-horticultureforestry/agricul-land-data-integ-pia/purpose-conclusion.aspx#.
  • Stenger R, Barkle G, Burgess C, Wall A, Clague J. 2008. Low nitrate contamination of shallow groundwater in spite of intensive dairying: the effect of reducing conditions in the vadose zone—aquifer continuum. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand). 47:1–24.
  • Stenger R, Clague J, Woodward S, Moorhead B, Burbery L, Canard H. 2012. Groundwater assimilative capacity – an untapped opportunity for catchment-scale nitrogen management? In: Currie LD, Christensen CL, editors. Occasional report No. 25. Fertilizer and lime research centre. Palmerston North: Massey University; p. 1–10.
  • Suter GW, Norton SB, Cormier SM. 2002. A methodology for inferring the causes of observed impairments in aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 21:1101–1111.
  • Thompson RM, Phillips NR, Townsend CR. 2009. Biological consequences of clear-cut logging around streams - moderating effects of management. Forest Ecology and Management. 257:931–940.
  • Tipa G, Teirney L. 2006. Using the Cultural Health Index: how the assess the health of streams and waterways. Ministry for Environment Report ME711.
  • Tomer MD, Charleson TH, Smith CT, Barton L, Thorn AJ, Gielen G. 2000. Evaluation of treatment performance and processes after six years of wastewater application at Whakarewarewa Forest, New Zealand. In: Henry CL, Harrison RB, Bastion PK, editors. The forest alternative: principles and practices of residuals use. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press; p. 155–162.
  • Townsend CR, Arbuckle CJ, Crowl TA, Scarsbrook MR. 1997. The relationship between land use and physicochemistry, food resources and macroinvertebrate communities in tributaries of the Taieri River, New Zealand: a hierarchically scaled approach. Freshwater Biology. 37:177–191.
  • Trolle D, Spigel B, Hamilton DP, Norton N, Sutherland D, Plew D, Allan MG. 2014. Application of a three-dimensional water quality model as a decision support tool for the management of land-use changes in the catchment of an oligotrophic lake. Environmental Management. 54:479–493.
  • Van Roon MR. 2011. Water sensitive residential developments: application of LIUDD principles and methods in the Netherlands. Australia and New Zealand. Urban Water Journal. 8:325–335.
  • Vant B, Huser B. 2000. Effects of intensifying catchment land-use on the water quality of Lake Taupo. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 60:261–264.
  • Verburg P, Hamill K, Unwin M, Abell J. 2010. Lake water quality in New Zealand 2010: Status and trends. Report prepared for the Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report HAM2010-107. NIWA Hamilton. 53 p.
  • Verburg PH, Neumann K, Nol L. 2011. Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Global Change Biology. 17:974–989.
  • Verburg PH, Van De Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L. 2009. From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. Journal of Environmental Management. 90:1327–1335.
  • Villeneuve B, Piffady J, Valette L, Souchon Y, Usseglio-Polatera P. 2018. Direct and indirect effects of multiple stressors on stream invertebrates across watershed, reach and site scales: a structural equation modelling better informing on hydromorphological impacts. Science of the Total Environment. 612:660–671.
  • Walmsley JJ. 2002. Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems. Environmental Management. 29:195–206.
  • Weaver AK, Schallenberg M, Burns CW. 2017. Land use, soil properties and weather conditions influence nutrient fluxes into a deep oligotrophic lake. Marine and Freshwater Research. 68:1830–1844.
  • White PA, Kovacova E, Zemansky G, Jebbour N, Moreau-Fournier M. 2012. Groundwater-surface water interaction in the Waimakariri River, New Zealand, and groundwater outflow from the river bed. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand). 51:1–23.
  • Wilcock RJ, Nash D, Schmidt J, Larned ST, Rivers MR, Feehan P. 2011. Inputs of nutrients and fecal bacteria to freshwaters from irrigated agriculture: case studies in Australia and New Zealand. Environmental Management. 48:198–211.
  • Young RG, Quarterman AJ, Eyles RF, Smith RA, Bowden WB. 2005. Water quality and thermal regime of the Motueka River: influences of land cover, geology and position in the catchment. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 39:803–825.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.