469
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The advantages and limitations of biophysical modelling as a tool for informing limit setting in New Zealand’s barrier-enclosed estuaries

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 509-530 | Received 11 Mar 2022, Accepted 12 Jul 2022, Published online: 27 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Estuaries are the receiving environment for catchment-derived contaminants, the fate of which depends on the interplay between the estuarine geomorphology and hydrodynamics. In large estuaries, biophysical processes are spatially and temporally-diverse, which makes understanding and managing the impact of human activities challenging. Here we use two common modelling approaches to explore the advantages and limitations of biophysical modelling as a tool for limit setting in a large barrier-enclosed estuary in New Zealand. The model shows the large spatial variation in water quality associated with low upper harbour flushing. Variations can also be attributed to spatial variation in processes (such as denitrification). Although the non-linear interactions between processes within these models can limit the value of using specific detail of outputs for decision making, the general patterns and sensitivities can be used to define areas, explore connectivity, and provide some information when monitoring data is lacking. Even in a deterministic modelling environment, it can very difficult to attribute water quality variations output at one location to the loading that caused these variations. While biophysical modelling will likely remain a core tool for informing management, any future development of limit setting methods for estuaries should recognise the inherent constraints we describe here.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council for funding the doctoral studies of Ben Stewart and Alex Port, and the ongoing Tauranga 2-D DELWAQ modelling and David Hamilton for contributing to those projects. KRB & CAP acknowledge the support of The Sustainable Sea National Science Challenge (projects 4.2.1 Tipping Points and 1.1 Ecological response to cumulative effects) supported by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (C01X1515).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 236.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.