That psychometric measurement of personality is difficult and problematic is no surprise. Boyle and Smári's possesive (1997) presentation and discussion of the problems leaves the impression that the difficulties are caused mainly by the extensive use of subjective self-report inventories (Q-data), and that many of the problems can be resolved through more research into objective instruments (T-data) similar to Cattell's Objective-Analytic Battery. In this commentary both assertions are questioned. It is argued that measurement problems in any personality assessment system are discussed best in terms of construct validity. It is concluded that the present explosive interest in personality research is mainly a consequence of using Q-data and the development of the five-factor model of personality. It is also concluded that evaluation of T-data is comparably discouraging.
Personlighet og målingsproblemer: En kommentar til Boyle og Smári
Personality and measurement problems: A comment to Boyle and Smári
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.