647
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Early voting in Australia: the costs and benefits of convenience

& ORCID Icon
Pages 117-134 | Published online: 13 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Pre-election day voting increases the opportunities for citizens to vote in an election. This paper asks who votes before election day in Australia and whether early voters and election day voters decide their vote differently. In Australia’s compulsory voting system early voting lowers the costs of voting for citizens who would otherwise be compelled to vote on a prescribed day. We may therefore expect that in a compulsory system, early voting has the effect of bringing forward some voter turnout, while aggregate turnout is unaffected. Using 2016 Australian Election Study data, we find that early voters do not appear to suffer time constraints distinguishing them from election day voters: they are no more likely to have caring responsibilities nor to work in time-inflexible occupations. Early voters tend to be older than election day voters, and are more likely to strongly dislike the leader of their non- preferred party. However, feelings towards the parties generally and the state of the economy are not related to early voting. This research suggests that of expanding the voting period in compulsory systems provides greater voter convenience but reduces the capacity of campaign promises and events to affect vote choice.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the advice and comments of participants at the 2017 Australian Society for Quantitative Political Science annual meeting, held in Wellington, New Zealand in December 2017.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Among the sample of 2711 respondents, 1076 strongly dislike at least one party, 325 strongly dislike the Liberal Party, 344 strongly dislike the Australian Labor Party, 300 strongly dislike the Nationals, and 683 strongly dislike the Australian Greens.

2. Results available from the authors.

3. We find there is insufficient variance within the subsample of Greens voters in the House of Representatives (n = 255) to perform multivariate analysis.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Jill Sheppard

Dr Jill Sheppard is a lecturer in the School of Politics and International Relations at the Australian National University. Her research focuses on public opinion, political participation, survey methodology, and Australian politics.

Katrine Beauregard

Dr Katrine Beauregard is a lecturer in the School of Politics and International Relations at the Australian National University. Her research focuses on gender politics and political participation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.