Publication Cover
Population Studies
A Journal of Demography
Volume 69, 2015 - Issue 1
414
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Explaining religious differentials in family-size preference: Evidence from Nepal in 1996

, &
Pages 23-37 | Received 10 May 2012, Accepted 28 May 2014, Published online: 16 Feb 2015
 

Abstract

We examine how religio-ethnic identity, individual religiosity, and family members' religiosity were related to preferred family size in Nepal in 1996. Analyses of survey data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study show that socio-economic characteristics and individual experiences can suppress, as well as largely account for, religio-ethnic differences in fertility preference. These religio-ethnic differentials are associated with variance in particularized theologies or general value orientations (like son preference) across groups. In addition, individual and family religiosity are both positively associated with preferred family size, seemingly because of their association with religious beliefs—beliefs that are likely to shape fertility strategies. These findings suggest the need for improvements in how we conceptualize and measure supra-individual religious influence in a variety of settings and for a range of demographically interesting outcomes.

Notes

1 Lisa D. Pearce is at the University of North Carolina, Hamilton Hall—CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Sarah Brauner-Otto is at McGill University. Yingchun Ji is at the National University of Singapore.

2 This research was supported by a Mellon Anthropological Demography training grant and an NICHD (Grant No. 5 T32 HD0714-02) Interdisciplinary Training Grant in Demography to the Population Research Institute, Penn State University. Additional support came from NICHD Grant No. R01 HD32912. Special thanks to William G. Axinn, Glenn Firebaugh, Nancy Landale, Hart Nelsen, Ron Rindfuss, Shannon Stokes, and the research staff of the Chitwan Valley Family Study for their contributions to this research. The authors are grateful to the Carolina Population Center for training support (T32 HD007168) and for general support (R24 HD050924).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 222.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.