Emotional intelligence and leadership traits among family physicians

ABSTRACT

Objectives: High emotional intelligence and leadership traits are essential for physicians in managing their responsibilities and thus building successful interactions with patients. This study explored the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership traits among family physicians.

Methods: Participants (2975 men, 972 women, mean = 42.0 ages, SD = 7.47) were family physicians working at family health-care centers across the seven geographical regions of Turkey who were contacted by e-mail. The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) and Leadership Traits Tool were used to collect data. Data were analyzed concerning physicians’ sex, age, health-care experience, and geographical region. The correlation between Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and leadership was also being examined.

Results: Our findings suggest that family physicians’ TEI differs based on sex, age, health-care experience, and the geographical region where they work. Women had higher mean values than did men for well-being, emotionality, and global TEI. Physicians aged younger than 29 years had the lowest mean values for emotional intelligence. As physicians’ health-care experience increased, they received higher scores for emotional intelligence. Physicians working in the Mediterranean had the highest mean TEI scores. There was a positive correlation between family physicians’ emotional intelligence and leadership traits. Higher emotional intelligence was correlated with increased leadership traits.

Conclusion: Emotional intelligence and leadership traits play crucial roles in increasing physicians’ personal and professional development. This may also increase physicians’ caregiving competencies and thus the quality of health services, as well as potentially decreasing physicians’ burnout and health-related costs.

KEYWORDS:

• Emotional intelligence
• leadership
• physicians
• medicine
• healthcare

Ethics

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Gazi University (14 April 2014, issue 198).

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript was not funded.