790
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Features - Letter to the Editor

Response to letter to the editor regarding the article ‘determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam’

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 472-473 | Received 12 Apr 2022, Accepted 04 May 2022, Published online: 27 May 2022

We would like to thank you for your interesting comments. There is no doubt that the COVID-19 pandemic has constituted a public health emergency in Vietnam and globally. With the continuing challenges, material and information used as tools to manage the pandemic need to be urgently revised in response to current affairs and changes in the community. Despite the global increase in COVID-19 infections, Vietnam’s low-cost response model to prior public health challenges emphasizes the critical role of a strategic public health system, sound governance, and the cooperation of the population in order to fight against public health issues, including the COVID 19 pandemic [Citation1]. Concretized examples of care ethics in Vietnam’s reaction to the COVID-19 outbreak include concern for vulnerable social groups and maintaining not only societal but also personal security [Citation2].

Our study applied the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a theoretical framework for developing a predictor of vaccination hesitancy, which is known as one of the most widely utilized conceptual frameworks in health-related behavior research [Citation3,Citation4]. The HBM emphasizes how individual behaviors have an important role to play in the understanding of how to improve a person’s health, and focuses on individual characteristics as the unit of change such as knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and personality traits, which are used to understand why people do or do not take part in preventive behaviors, including vaccination [Citation3]. For a new vaccine-like COVID-19, the HBM has also been proven to be a good predictor of the perceived desire to get a COVID-19 vaccination and accounts for 30% of the variation in our earlier study [Citation5].

Reader suggested that the factors associated with hesitancy might rapidly change in different periods of pandemic. We believe that individuals’ preventative activities will vary in diverse situations with different contexts of health practices and culture, and all of which can alter over time. Nevertheless, at the time of the survey (between January 21 and 20 April 2021), COVID-19 vaccines for children (under 18 years old) were not approved in Vietnam. Since the middle of October 2021, indications have been present of an intention to implement immunization strategies for younger member of the community aged 12 to 17. Besides, the government would collaborate with vaccine suppliers and accelerate domestic vaccine research to obtain vaccines as quickly as possible for children under the age of 12. Consequently, there was little information regarding COVID-19 vaccination for children, or its adverse effects, that could have significantly influenced parents’ intention or hesitancy to vaccinate their children. Moreover, our study also identified the reasons for individuals’ hesitancy, which aided policymakers in determining which problems and factors to prioritize and in comprehending key elements of the current context, from which they can design and craft well-tailored interventions or messages for a specific community group. Our findings have been applied to health education communication prior to mass vaccination campaigns, with success beyond the stated expectations, with the rate of individuals aged 12 and over completing 2nd dose accounting for 77.7% [Citation6].

In conclusion, health communications must be based on sound theory and appropriate practice strategies for a given scenario and period. Before each vaccination campaign, the primary goal will be to develop communication interventions that result in a behavior change to reduce vaccine rejection and vaccine uptake delays.

Disclosure of any financial/other conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.