160
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COVID-19

Pediatric emergency revisits of children with COVID-19

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 379-385 | Received 30 Sep 2022, Accepted 08 Dec 2022, Published online: 22 Dec 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

This study was conducted to reveal the characteristics of pediatric emergency revisits of children with COVID-19 and the factors associated with clinical worsening and hospitalization at the revisit.

Materials and Methods

In pediatric emergency visits of children between July 2020 and March 2021 with COVID-19, the patients who had a revisit within 7 days were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics, test results, and the relationship of these variables with clinical worsening and hospitalization at the revisit were investigated.

Results

In 6779 children with COVID-19, 284 (4.1%) patients included in the study. 51.8% of the patients were male, the median age was 11.1 years, and median time to revisit time was 2.0 days. The rates of clinical worsening and hospitalization were 9.1% and 14.7%, respectively. Children younger than 24 months and those with chronic diseases were more commonly hospitalized at the revisit. Though the frequency of laboratory and radiologic testing at the revisit was significantly increased compared to the first presentation, tests did not play an important role in the decision-making processes. More than 85% of patients were clinically mild at the first presentation and revisit.

Conclusions

Children with a diagnosis of COVID-19 can revisit the emergency without evident clinical worsening. Since revisits cause increase in frequency of laboratory and radiological testing, preventing unnecessary revisits of children with COVID-19 can reduce the workload and cost of health care services. We may consider changing our perspective on revisit patients to make decisions based on clinical findings instead of obtaining for more laboratory tests.

Declaration of interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was received to produce this article

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 708.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.