44
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Respiratory Medicine

A new perspective on OSAS cases with the Baveno classification

, , , , &
Received 09 Feb 2024, Accepted 10 Jul 2024, Published online: 15 Jul 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Objective/Background

Since the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), which is used in the diagnosis and grading of OSAS, does not adequately reflect the clinical perspective of the disease, the Baveno classification of OSA was developed, which allows multicomponent evaluation of OSAS patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the application of the Baveno classification in clinical practice.

Patients/Methods

A prospective study was performed on patients diagnosed with OSAS between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to Baveno classification (Groups A-D) and three groups as mild, moderate, and severe OSAS according to AHI.

Results

A total of 378 patients (70% male, mean age 48.68 ± 11.81 years) were included in the study. The patients had mild (n: 75; 20%), moderate (n: 88; 23%), and severe (n: 215; 57%) OSAS. According to Baveno classification, patients were included in Groups A (n: 90; 24%), B (n: 105 (28%), C (n: 65; 17%), and D (n: 118; 31%). The mean AHIs of the Baveno groups were similar (p = 0.116). Oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was higher in Groups B and D compared to Group A. The duration of T90 desaturation was longer in Groups C and D compared to Groups A and B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The Baveno classification divided our OSAS cases into equivalent groups. One out of every four patients with mild OSAS was in Group D. This data was noteworthy in that the Baveno classification allows for the identification of symptomatic and comorbid patients with mild OSAS according to AHI and for the application of more effective treatments to these patients. Patients with comorbidities experienced oxygen desaturation for a longer period of time at night, and oxygenation deteriorated in patients with prominent symptoms. Baveno classification was found to be a more reasonable and easily applicable approach in clinical practice.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

Handan Inonu Koseoglu; data analysis, writing the manuscript, audited the data, and primarily responsible for the final content of the manuscript. Gokhan Aykun; preparation, collection of data, conducted the research, assisted with copyediting. Asiye Kanbay; collection of data, conducting research, auditing data. Ahmet Cemal Pazarlı; assist with copy editing, auditing data. Halil İbrahim Yakar; collection of data, critical evaluation. Osman Demir; data analysis, writing the manuscript, critical evaluation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 708.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.