ChatGPT: “To Be or Not to Be” in Bikini Bottom

Abstract

Objective: In this report, we tested ChatGPT’s ability to think abstractly and to integrate information about two seemingly disparate topics by requesting a well-articulated, intellectually stimulating essay in response to a complex and somewhat paradoxical task. Method: We asked ChatGPT to write a satirical essay comparing SpongeBob Squarepants to Shakespeare’s Hamlet and examined its ability to create a cohesive essay using abstract thinking. Findings: ChatGPT’s comparison of Hamlet and SpongeBob was successful, comprehensive, and convincing, demonstrating the ability to make judgments and to use appropriate metaphors and idioms. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ChatGPT can respond to complex tasks using abstract thinking.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Aaron B. Weingrad

Aaron B. Weingrad is a Scientific Program Coordinator and Executive Assistant to the Director at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University. He graduated from University of Maryland, College Park with a Bachelor’s of Science in Cell Biology and Genetics and a minor in Geochemistry.

Stephen J. Cozza

Stephen J. Cozza is Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Director of the Child and Family Program, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress. He is a retired US Army Colonel who served 25 years in military service.