Conversational argument is characterized as sequential expansion of adjacency pairs aimed at regulating disagreement. The preconditions and embedded propositons of the speech act performed in the arguable turn define the sorts of expansions recognizable as arguments. General properties of adjacency pairs explain the prevalence of enthymemes in conversation.
Quarterly Journal of Speech
Volume 66, 1980 - Issue 3
![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation
Source:
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Argument structures in decision‐making groups
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Arguing to Display Identity
Source:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online Argument Between Israeli Jews and Palestinians
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy
Source:
(:unav)
Seduced by secrecy – perplexed by complexity: effects of secret vs open-source on intelligence credibility and analytic confidence
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Preaching to the Converted. Why Argue When Everyone Agrees
Source:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Majority‐minority influence: identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument‐outcome links
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Science in Discussions
Source:
Wiley
Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?
Source:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Couples' argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics
Source:
Informa UK Limited
GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS
Source:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Interpersonal argumentation: Conflict and reason‐giving
Source:
Informa UK Limited
References
Source:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions
Source:
HAL CCSD
Politeness Judgments in Personal Relationships
Source:
SAGE Publications
Behavioural artificial intelligence: an agenda for systematic empirical studies of artificial inference
Source:
Center for Open Science
The uses of folk linguistics
Source:
Wiley
Linking provided by
