51
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Examination of blood haemoglobin concentration measured using the OSM2

Pages 92-101 | Received 10 Mar 2008, Accepted 26 Jun 2008, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Blood haemoglobin concentration is regularly measured automatically by instruments reporting the value in around 1 min. The OSM2 from Radiometer is an example. Results from this instrument have been compared with those of a reference method using the hemiglobincyanide principle. Four healthy, moderately trained, young men (non‐smokers) cycled for 2 min to exhaustion. Blood samples were drawn from indwelling catheters in the femoral artery and vein before exercise, during exercise and in the 1 h recovery. Blood haemoglobin concentration was analysed using both methods. The results of the OSM2 were linearly related to those of the control method, with a random variation of 0.14 mmol L−1 (1.5 %). For arterial blood, the OSM2 showed a systematic bias of −0.36 mmol L−1 (−4 %). For femoral venous samples the bias varied depending on the haemoglobin concentration, being negative at low concentrations and positive at high values (−3 to +2 %). Consequently, the arteriovenous (a‐v) difference differed systematically between the two methods. The varying bias in the results of the OSM2 for femoral‐venous samples correlated with pH, pCO2, O2 saturation of haemoglobin (sO2) and with the haemoglobin concentration itself (cHb). Partial correlation analyses suggest that only the latter two correlations were independent, while correlations of the bias with pH and pCO2 were removed when correcting for the effect of sO2 and cHb. In conclusion, the OSM2 measures the blood haemoglobin concentration fairly precisely, but there is a variable bias of up to 4 % in absolute value. Finally, the instrument does not report a‐v differences reliably.

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to Astrid Bolling and Ada Ingvaldsen for their skilled technical assistance, and to one of the reviewers for comments pointing out possible bias in the reference method used.

Declaration of interest: The author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 200.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.