Parathyroid hormone reference intervals in adults using second- and third-generation assays

Abstract

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a routine biochemical analysis, and it varies whether a second- or third-generation assay is used. Information on the levels obtained with different assays and evidence to substantiate local assay-specific reference ranges are important to inform clinical practice. Prior to a shift from the second- to the third-generation PTH assay (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics) in the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, a total of 59 EDTA-plasma samples were collected for method comparison (Passing–Bablok). Furthermore, 120 EDTA-plasma samples were randomly obtained from adult blood donors and used for the establishment of reference intervals using the third-generation PTH assay (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics) and two second-generation assays (Atellica, Siemens Healthineers; Alinity, Abbott Laboratories). Method comparison (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics) showed lower levels with the third-generation (y) as compared to the second-generation assay (x) depending on the measurement range (PTH < 10 pmol/L: y = 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7; 0.9) x + 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2; 0.5), PTH ≥ 10 pmol/L: y = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5; 0.6) x + 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1; 5.2)). Method-specific reference intervals (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles) after the exclusion of samples (n = 31) with 25-hydroxy-vitamin D below 50 nmol/L were: 1.8–8.5 pmol/L (second-generation, Atellica, Siemens Healthineers); 2.4–10.9 pmol/L (second-generation, Alinity, Abbott Laboratories), and 1.8–7.0 pmol/L (third-generation, Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics). PTH levels with second- and third-generation assays are not interchangeable. Clinicians should be informed when a laboratory assay is changed, and method-specific reference ranges are needed.

Keywords:

• PTH
• immunoassay
• vitamin D
• hypoparathyroidism
• hyperparathyroidism

Author contributions

SLA and PAC conceptualized the study and performed data analyses. SLA drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to interpretation and critical review of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).