![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: Biologically based complementary medicines (BB-CMs) are popular in patients with cancer. However, there are only limited data for BB-CMs in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). We aimed to identify the prevalence and type of BB-CM use and the association to the nutritional risk score (NRS-2002) in NET patients.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study in NET outpatients at the Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology at Aarhus University Hospital. The nutritional risk was determined by the NRS-2002.
Results: We included 186 patients (51% women, median age 66 years). Sixty-six percent were regular BB-CM users. Forty-two percent used at least two supplements. The most popular BB-CMs were vitamin and mineral supplements (47%), calcium and vitamin D (34%). One-third used non-vitamin non-mineral supplements such as fish oil, herbs, Ginger, Q-10, garlic and probiotics. The use of BB-CMs was associated with female gender (48% vs. 37%, p < .05). Intake was significantly more frequent among patients with an NRS score ≥ 3, (60% vs. 76%) and in patients with change in performance status (58% vs. 76%), (p < .05, all). Patients reporting dietary changes used BB-CMs more frequently than patients without dietary changes (61% vs. 77%) (p < .05).
Conclusions: In our study, 66% percent of NET patients use BB-CM and 42% used two or more supplements. Vitamins with and without herbal ingredients, minerals, calcium, vitamin D, and fish oil were the most popular supplements. The use of BB-CMs was associated with an NRS score ≥ 3, change in dietary intake, female gender, and change in ECOG performance status.
Disclosure statement
Henning Grønbaek has received research grants from Abbvie, Intercept, NOVO Nordisk Foundation and serves on advisory board for Ipsen.