185
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; 18 years of experience and outcomes across two generations of surgeons at a tertiary center in Sweden

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 401-405 | Received 24 Sep 2021, Accepted 24 Nov 2021, Published online: 06 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Aim

Reconstructive surgery with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard procedure after colectomy in patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP). It is of interest to understand how a generation shift of the surgeons performing IPAA has affected patients’ outcomes.

Method

All consecutive patients who underwent IPAA in the period 1999–2016 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden, were included. Surgeons representing two different generations performed the surgeries during this period. The following 6-year time periods were assigned for surgeries performed by: experienced surgeons (1999–2004; Period 1); the new generation of surgeons undergoing training (2005–2010; Period 2); and the new generation of experienced surgeons (2011–2016; Period 3). The primary endpoint was post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b), and the secondary endpoints were the functional outcome, failure of the pouch, and mortality. Logistic analyses of the results were performed.

Results

Overall, 281 patients were included in the study. The rate of post-operative severe complications was lower in Period 1 [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.137; p = .01]. There was no difference in functional outcome between the groups.

Conclusion

This study implicates that the risk of post-operative complications after IPAA is lower when the surgery is performed by a generation of more-experienced surgeons. This might support literature that concludes that surgical units that have a high throughput of patients and are staffed by surgeons who perform many procedures provide better outcomes.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr. 2021-00380).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by ALF-Västra Götalandsregionen.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.