169
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The galactose elimination capacity test to monitor liver disease course in patients with Wilson’s disease

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 589-594 | Received 23 Sep 2021, Accepted 24 Dec 2021, Published online: 07 Jan 2022
 

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of Wilson’s disease (WD) has changed radically since the introduction of medical therapy with chelators and zinc. However, there is an unmet need for methods to evaluate the long-term treatment response and the liver disease progression in order to identify treatment failures. The galactose elimination capacity test (GEC) is a physiological measure of the total metabolic capacity of the liver, and a strong predictor of long- and short-term mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Our aim was to investigate if the GEC test is useful for evaluation of treatment response and prediction of treatment failures in WD patients.

Methods

We included all patients with WD in Denmark from 1992 through 2017 and retrieved data on GEC along with data on transplantation and death.

Results

In total, 37 patients had completed one or more GEC tests. Of these, 31 were alive (three transplanted) and six were dead (two transplanted). A total of 24 patients had completed more than one GEC test. All 18 alive, nontransplanted patients showed improvement in GEC values following onset of treatment, except one patient, who was clinically confirmed with treatment failure. All six patients who underwent liver transplantation or died had a prior decline in their GEC. The difference in GEC development between patients alive and not transplanted and patients dead or transplanted was significant (p < .001). Index GEC values could not predict transplantation or death (p = .26).

Conclusion

The GEC test is a promising tool for monitoring treatment response and identifying treatment failures in patients with WD.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (50611) and approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (1–16–02-614-15).

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data availability statement

Please contact author for data requests.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by The Memorial Foundation of Manufacturer Vilhelm Pedersen & Wife. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.