ABSTRACT
Managing microaggressions and marginalizing experiences while negotiating the ongoing oppression that occurs in micro, mezzo, and macro settings can be particularly challenging for clinicians of color. Thus, supervision with clinicians of color must include affirmation, empowerment, and exploration of the intracultural/intercultural dynamics inherent in the treatment-providing process and clinical supervision. Through case studies, autoethnographic studies of our supervision experiences, and interviews with supervisors and supervisees, we reflect on how axes of identity, including race, power, and privilege, inform practitioners’ clinical lenses and affect their vulnerability in treatment and the clinical supervision dyad. Special attention is placed on the clinical supervisor–clinician–client triad (the triple process) and the interpersonal dynamics of cultural sensitivity, cultural humility, and authentic responsiveness that supervisors aim to model and cultivate in the supervisory relationship. In addition to sustaining clinical growth for clinicians of color, adding this level of complexity to supervision supports equity in direct clinical practice, enhancing efficacy outcomes for clients and communities. Recommendations and pedagogical strategies are offered to support supervisors in initiating difficult dialogues and shifting the paradigm to promote this transformational perspective.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Allen E. Lipscomb
Allen E. Lipscomb, PsyD, MSW, LCSW, is a faculty member in the Social Work Department at California State University, Northridge. His research and practice interest is centered on psychiatric services for communities of color.
Wendy Ashley
Wendy Ashley, PsyD, LCSW, is an associate professor and associate chair in the Social Work Department at California State University, Northridge, where she infuses an intersectionality lens in her teaching, practice, and research.