32
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

26—STRUCTURAL AND NON-STRUCTURAL EFFECTS IN THE OBSERVED STRESS-STRAIN CURVE FOR WET WOOL FIBRES

&
Pages 379-400 | Received 25 Aug 1967, Accepted 05 Dec 1967, Published online: 25 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

This paper describes a detailed theoretical and experimental investigation into the relationship between wool-fibre non-uniformities and stress-strain behaviour. The shape of the stress-strain curve in the yield region is closely related to the fibre cumulative cross-sectional-area distribution. The fibre-material yield slope is found to be nearly zero, and the changes from Hookean to yield region and from yield to post-yield region for the material are quite sharp. The observed relative yield slope (relative to the stress at 15% extension) and the coefficient of variation of area interact in the manner predicted except that there are quantitative differences between the experimentally and theoretically derived relationships; these deviations are interpreted as structural effects due to fluctuations in the stress at 15% extension along the fibres, a variation that is relatively independent of the changes in cross-sectional area along the fibres. The mean effective coefficient of variation of area due to this structural variation is found to be of the same magnitude as the mean coefficient of variation of area for the wool-fibre types examined.

Previous results relating crimp to the cross-sectional area and the Hookean slope are confirmed; within the fibre groups, thicker fibres have a higher crimp level and a lower relative Hookean slope (relative to the stress at 15% extension), whereas between groups the thicker fibres have a lower crimp level and a higher relative Hookean slope than thinner fibres. The stress at 15% extension is significantly different for the different wool-fibre types, which indicates real structural differences between the fibre types. As the fibre mean cross-sectional area increases, the fibres show a tendency to be structurally ‘stronger’, the magnitude of this effect agreeing with values obtained by other investigators. Thinner fibres, as well as being structurally ‘weaker’, tend to be more variable in cross-sectional area and less elliptical in cross-section.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.