Erratum

Is fishing intensification a direct route to hunter-gatherer complexity? A case study from the Beagle Channel region (Tierra del Fuego, southern South America)

Atilio Francisco Zangrando

Published in World Archaeology, 41(4): 589–608, DOI: 10.1080/00438240903363848.

Values in the last two columns of Appendix A on p. 608 should have been expressed as decimals, rather than whole numbers. The corrected table is reproduced below:

Appendix A: NISP of faunal assemblages used for the calculation of evenness index

Sites/Assemblages	Radiocarbon dates	Pinnipeds	Guanacos	Birds	Fish	H′	V′
Túnel I (Second Comp. layer D)
Fase I	6470 ± 100/6020 ± 120	2,223	149	70	39	0.395	0.284
Fase II	6410 ± 150	6,645	305	252	463	0.530	0.382
Fase III	5950 ± 170	3,288	191	185	484	0.713	0.514
Fase IV		11,346	752	901	194	0.490	0.353
Fase V	5840 ± 185/5630 ± 120	5,067	254	450	859	0.758	0.547
Fase VI	4590 ± 130	4,764	642	515	387	0.815	0.588
Fase VII		4,434	830	305	1,028	0.934	0.674
Fase VIII		3,398	618	527	404	0.947	0.683
Túnel I (Third component)	4300 ± 80	983	741	800	107	1.212	0.874
Túnel I (Fourth component)	2690 ± 80/2660 ± 100	780	1,521	960	44	1.097	0.791
Túnel I (Fifth component)	1920 ± 80	707	318	64	19	0.864	0.623
Shamakush I	1020 ± 100/940 ± 110	102	1,227	231	2,605	0.881	0.635
Túnel I (Sixth component)	670 ± 80/450 ± 60	113	10	32	233	0.944	0.681
Shamakush X	500 ± 100	9	9	198	352	0.754	0.540
Imiwaia I (layer B)	150 ± 70	313	6	2,156	2,366	0.925	0.667