Article Title: Assessment of DNA methylation markers for forensic applications
Authors: Rebecca Richards, Jayshree Patel, Kate Stevenson, and Sally Ann Harbison
Journal: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2019.1574898
When the article was first published online, the sequence of the reference list was inadvertently changed which caused mismatch with the in-text citations.
The correct reference list should be:
1. Bekaert B, Kamalandua A, Zapico SC, Van de Voorde W, Decorte R. Improved age determination of blood and teeth samples using a selected set of DNA methylation markers. Epigenetics. 2015;10(10):922-30.
2. Zbiec-Piekarska R, Spolnicka M, Kupiec T, Parys-Proszek A, Makowska Z, Paleczka A, et al. Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;17:173-9.
3. Lee HY, Jung SE, Oh YN, Choi A, Yang WI, Shin KJ. Epigenetic age signatures in the forensically relevant body fluid of semen: a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;19:28-34.
4. Vidaki A, Kayser M. Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;37:180-95.
5. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(30):10604-9.
6. Richards R, Patel J, Stevenson K, Harbison S. Evaluation of massively parallel sequencing for forensic DNA methylation profiling. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(21):2798-805.
These have been corrected both in the online and print versions.