1,425
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

To Whom Does the City Belong? Obstacles to Right to the City for the Urban Poor in Bangladesh

ORCID Icon
Pages 638-659 | Published online: 02 Aug 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Due to a lack of available job opportunities in the formal sector and financial resources, in most parts of the developing world the urban poor rely on access to urban public space for earning their livelihoods. The existing literature shows that the urban poor are often evicted without relocation from public spaces by city governments in promoting a “global city” image. Within this context, this article explores how city authorities deny a right to the city for the urban poor. In Dhaka, Bangladesh, this occurs through a comprehensive and orchestrated programme to deny the poor their rights as citizens of the city, to exploit and extort them, to manipulate the political system and to stigmatise them. Focussing on poor people’s involvement in informal street vending in a case study of a slum in Dhaka, this article argues that Bangladesh’s particular form of oppressive political culture, particularly its authoritarian party system, does not provide poor citizens with even the voice required to negotiate a right to the city. The article identifies particular forms of everyday governance that lead to a complete stripping of effective political power.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr Peter Walters, Dr Sonia Roitman and Professor Adil Khan for their valuable comments and feedback on an earlier version of this article and thanks all the interviewees who shared their experiences, views and time. Many thanks to the journal’s editor and anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. Additional information on the recruitment of interviewees is available from the author. Ethics approval was from the University of Queensland.

2. Similar attitudes, unfavourable to the informal sector, are evident in other Asian cities. Some of these attitudes and policies emerged from uncritical continuations of colonial policies (McGee, McGee, and Yeung Citation1977).

3. In India, to justify denying a citizen’s constitutional rights, the state and its apparatuses label the informal trader as an “improper citizen”. Indian courts are also performing this act by labelling slum residents as “encroachers” and “thieves” (Bhan Citation2009, 135).

4. This kind of extortion is not only practiced in Dhaka but also in many cities in the global south (see Anjaria Citation2011). For example, Swider’s (Citation2015) study in China revealed that the state officials run similar types of eviction drives and demand bribes from the street vendors.

5. Recently, some NGOs have begun to provide legal advice to the poor and it remains to be seen how long this will be tolerated by the state.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 136.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.