Surveillance of wildlife for Mycobacterium bovis infection using culture of pooled tissue samples from ferrets (Mustela furo)

Abstract

AIM: To compare culture results of homogenates of pooled lymph nodes from individual ferrets with and without macroscopic lesions of bovine tuberculosis for the presence of Mycobacterium bovis, and to determine whether homogenates from 10–30 ferrets could be combined and cultured without loss of sensitivity as a possible method for improving cost-effectiveness of surveillance for M. bovis infection in wildlife populations.

METHODS: Numbers of colony forming units (cfu) of M. bovis present in cultures of homogenates of pooled lymph nodes from individual ferrets known to be infected and having no visible lesions (NVL) or macroscopic lesions consistent with bovine tuberculosis were determined. Prevalences of M. bovis infection in populations of ferrets in the Marlborough region of the South Island of New Zealand were determined by culturing homogenates of pooled lymph nodes from individual animals. Samples from homogenates from North Canterbury were combined to form pools representing 10, 20 and 30 animals and also cultured for M. bovis.

RESULTS: Fewer M. bovis cfu were isolated from ferrets with NVL (mean=0.77 log₁₀) compared with ferrets with macroscopic lesions (mean=3.22 log₁₀; p<0.05). The mean prevalence of infection in eight different surveys involving 427 ferrets from the Marlborough region was 18% (range 8–44%), which included a small number of animals with macroscopic lesions of tuberculosis. Pooling of samples from up to 30 different ferrets with NVL did not reduce the sensitivity of detecting M. bovis-infected populations.

CONCLUSION: Culturing of pools of lymph node samples detected a significant proportion of M. bovis-infected ferrets that would otherwise have gone unnoticed based on samples that had only macroscopic lesions. Culturing of samples pooled from up to 30 different ferrets could provide significant cost savings in surveys of wildlife for the presence of M. bovis infection without any apparent loss of sensitivity.

KEY WORDS:

• Ferret
• Mycobacterium bovis
• wildlife
• survey
• Mustela furo

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Animal Health Board. AgriQuality Livestock Consultants are thanked for carrying out many of the post mortem examinations. Maree Joyce, Yvette Ridley and Carol Wilson are thanked for culturing many of the ferret samples.

Notes

¹ New Zealand Animal Health Board, Wellington, NZ