Wild-ing the Ethnography of Conservation: Writing Nature’s Value and Agency In

ABSTRACT

When reading ethnographic literature on nature conservation, one may wonder: where has nature gone? Social anthropologists have written nuanced ethnographies of how the environmental projects of governments and transnational NGOs encounter, dispossess, clash culturally with, and try to govern native people across the world. Yet, these diverse ethnographies often say little about what motivates those encounters firstly: local and global nature, especially wildlife, plants, and the planet’s ecological crisis. Thus, this paper seeks ways how ethnographic writing on conservation practice could better reflect that the planet’s many self-willed, struggling, and valued non-humans, too, enter conservation’s encounters. To find paths toward such a ‘wild-ing’ of ethnography, the paper locates and reviews disparate materials from across the social-anthropological literature on biodiversity conservation. The review is structured through three questions: How does and could the ethnography of conservation represent nature’s value? How can it show that animals, plants, and other nature make and meet worlds? How can it incorporate natural science data about non-human worlds and ecological crisis? Altogether, we understand nature conservation clearer through the interdisciplinary and more-than-human ethnography of world-making encounters. Such wilder ethnography may also better connect people’s suffering and nature’s vanishing – as problems both for anthropology and conservation science.

KEYWORDS:

• Value of nature
• non-human agency
• political ecology
• interdisciplinary ethnography
• ethics of anthropology

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the guidance by Cathel Hutchison, Coll Hutchison, Marshall Kramer, Sahil Nijhawan, Laura Rival, and two anonymous reviewers. All mistakes are mine.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Laur Kiik http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2552-8971