815
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Winner of the 2017 Martyn Jope Award

Placing the Pillar of Eliseg: Movement, Visibility and Memory in the Early Medieval Landscape

&
Pages 69-103 | Published online: 19 Jun 2017
 

Abstract

THE LANDSCAPE CONTEXT of the early 9th-century monument known as the Pillar of Eliseg is interrogated here for the first time with GIS-based analysis and innovative spatial methodologies. Our interpretation aims to move beyond regarding the Pillar as a prominent example of early medieval monument reuse and a probable early medieval assembly site. We argue that the location and topographical context of the cross and mound facilitated the monument’s significance as an early medieval locus of power, faith and commemoration in a contested frontier zone. The specific choice of location is shown to relate to patterns of movement and visibility that may have facilitated and enhanced the ceremonial and commemorative roles of the monument. By shedding new light on the interpretation of the Pillar of Eliseg as a node of social and religious aggregation and ideological power, our study has theoretical and methodological implications for studying the landscape contexts of early medieval stone monuments.

Résumé

Positionnement du « pilier d’Eliseg » : mouvement, visibilité et mémoire dans le paysage du début du Moyen-Âge par Patricia Murrieta-Flores et Howard Williams

Le paysage dans lequel s’inscrit le monument du début du 9ème siècle dénommé « pilier d’Eliseg » est examiné ici pour la première fois à l’aide d’une analyse SIG et de méthodologies spatiales innovatrices. Notre interprétation cherche à aller au-delà de la considération du « pilier » en tant qu’exemple proéminent de réemploi d’un monument et site probable d’assemblée au début du Moyen-Âge. Nous avançons que l’emplacement et le contexte topographique de la croix et du monticule étaient significatifs d’un monument qui incarnait le locus du pouvoir, de la foi et de la commémoration au début du Moyen-Âge, dans une zone frontalière contestée. Nous montrons que le choix de cet emplacement spécifique se rapporte aux schémas de mouvement et de visibilité qui ont pu faciliter et renforcer les rôles cérémoniel et commémoratif du monument. En apportant un nouvel éclairage à l’interprétation du « pilier d’Eliseg » comme nœud d’agrégation sociale et religieuse et de pouvoir idéologique, notre étude a des implications théoriques et méthodologiques pour l’exploration du paysage dans lequel s’inscrivent les monuments de pierre du début du Moyen-Âge.

Zusammenfassung

Die Säule von Eliseg und ihr Standort: Bewegung, Sichtigkeit und Reminiszenz in der Landschaft des frühen Mittelalters von Patricia Murrieta-Flores und Howard Williams

Der landschaftliche Kontext des als Säule von Eliseg bekannten Monuments aus dem frühen 9. Jahrhundert wird hier erstmals mithilfe GIS-gestützter Analysen und innovativer, räumlich orientierter Methodik untersucht. Unsere Interpretation geht über die traditionelle Einstufung der Säule von Eliseg als prominentes Beispiel eines frühmittelalterlichen Monuments und wahrscheinlicher Versammlungsstätte hinaus. Es wird dargelegt, dass sowohl der Standort als auch der topografische Kontext des Kreuzes und Erdwalls auf die Bedeutung des Monuments als frühmittelalterlicher Ort der Macht, des Glaubens und des Gedenkens in einem umkämpften Grenzgebiet hindeuten. Die spezifische Standortwahl wird zu Bewegungs- und Sichtigkeitsmustern in Beziehung gesetzt, welche die Rolle des Monuments als zeremoniellen Ort und Gedenkstätte unterstreichen und bestätigen. Die Interpretation der Säule von Eliseg als Zentrum sozialer und religiöser Aggregation sowie ideologischer Macht wird neu beleuchtet, wobei die Studie theoretische sowie methodologische Implikationen für die Erforschung frühmittelalterlicher Steinmonumente in ihrem landschaftlichen Kontext aufweist.

Riassunto

La collocazione della Colonna di Eliseg: lo spostamento, la visibilità e la memoria nel paesaggio altomedievale di Patricia Murrieta-Flores e Howard Williams

Si esamina qui per la prima volta il contesto paesaggistico del monumento del IX secolo noto come la Colonna di Eliseg facendo ricorso all’analisi basata sul sistema informativo geografico (GIS Geographic Information System) e su metodologie spaziali innovative. La nostra interpretazione si prefigge di andare al di là della considerazione che la colonna costituisce un importante esempio di riutilizzazione di un monumento altomedievale e probabilmente un sito di riunione nell’Alto Medioevo. Noi sosteniamo che la posizione e il contesto topografico del tumulo con la croce hanno facilitato l’aspetto significativo del monumento in quanto località di potere, di fede e di commemorazione in una contesa zona di frontiera. Si dimostra qui come la precisa scelta della località sia in relazione a schemi di spostamenti e di visibilità che possono avere favorito e sottolineato il ruolo cerimoniale e commemorativo del monumento. Dando nuova luce all’interpretazione della Colonna di Eliseg come centro di aggregazione sociale e religiosa e di potere ideologico, il nostro studio ha implicazioni teoretiche e metodologiche per l’esame dei contesti paesaggistici dei monumenti in pietra altomedievali.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the HER of Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust for supplying details of archaeological sites in the vicinity of the Pillar of Eliseg. We would like to thank Rhiannon Comeau, Nancy Edwards, Dai Morgan Evans, Tim Malim, Keith Ray, Marion Shiner, Gary Robinson and Rachel Swallow for guidance and critical comments. All arguments and errors remain the authors’ responsibility. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) ERC grant ‘The Past in its Place’ (agreement no 284085).

Notes

3 Williams et al Citation2015a.

4 Back Danielsson Citation2015; Coatsworth Citation2015; Crouwers Citation2015; Edwards Citation2001; Hall Citation2015; Reynolds and Langlands Citation2011; Williams Citation2011; Williams et al Citation2015b.

6 Edwards Citation2009, 146–9; Citation2013a, 322–36.

7 Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 417; Edwards Citation2009, 155–68; Citation2013a, 322–36; Williams Citation2011, 17–20.

8 Edwards Citation2009, 170.

12 Davies Citation1982, 104–6.

13 Edwards Citation2009, 143–9; Edwards et al Citation2011; Citation2013a; Citation2014.

14 Eg Hall Citation2015.

15 Edwards et al Citationforthcoming.

16 Tong et al Citation2015.

17 Eg Brookes Citation2007; Williams et al Citation2010; see now Baker and Brookes Citation2015a; Semple and Sanmark Citation2013.

18 Baker and Brookes Citation2015a, 9; Bradley Citation1987; Darvill Citation2004; Semple Citation2013; Semple and Sanmark Citation2013, 532–4b; Williams Citation2006.

19 Williams Citation2011, 24–5.

20 Edwards et al Citationforthcoming.

21 Edwards Citation2009, 163; Williams Citation2011.

22 Edwards Citation2013, 377–85.

23 Bennett Citation1995; Pratt Citation1995; Sherratt Citation2000; Silvester and Hankinson Citation2002; Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust Citation2015a.

24 Williams Citation1990, 105.

25 Semple and Sanmark Citation2013, 528–32; parallels might be found in the work of Elizabeth FitzPatrick on the relationship between assembly places, ancient monuments and landscapes of varied geologies making them attractive for seasonal hunting: Fitzpatrick Citation2012; Citation2015.

26 Edwards Citation2009, 149; Williams Citation2011, 24.

27 Seaman Citation2016.

28 Ibid, 41; see also Kightly Citation2003; Edwards Citation2008; Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust Citation2015b.

29 Silvester and Evans Citation2009; cf Davies Citation1982, 140–3; Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 602–14.

30 Edwards Citation2009, 168–9.

31 Charles-Edwards Citation2004; Comeau Citation2014.

32 Edwards Citation2009, 152–5.

33 Williams Citation2011, 24–5; cf Kirton Citation2015.

34 Edwards Citation2013, 324–5.

35 Williams Citation2011; see also Kirton Citation2015; Williams et al Citation2015b; Williams Citation2016.

36 For a view of assembly places as zones in the early medieval Welsh landscape, see Comeau Citation2014, 278–81. See Seaman (Citation2016, 41) regarding the twinning of ecclesiastical and hilltop sites which might provide parallels to the association of the Pillar with Castell Dinas Brân and Llangollen.

37 cf Back Danielsson, Citation2015.

38 Fox Citation1955; Noble Citation1983; Hill and Worthington Citation2003; Ray and Bapty Citation2016.

39 Hayes and Malim Citation2008, 172–8, see also Worthington Citation1997; Worthington Hill and Grigg Citation2015, 162–6, 176–7. Although, note reservations regarding the dating by Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 20.

40 Lock Citation2000; Earl et al Citation2013; Frachetti Citation2006; Citation2008; Lake and Woodman Citation2003; Llobera Citation2007a, Citation2007b; Llobera and Sluckin Citation2007; Mlekuž Citation2010; Citation2014; Murrieta-Flores Citation2012; Citation2013; Citation2014; Verhagen Citation2010; Wheatley et al Citation2010; Wheatley and Gillings Citation2002.

41 Baker and Brookes Citation2015b, 228; Brookes Citation2013, 43–4; Hill and Worthington Citation2003, 98–9, 126–8.

42 Tabik et al Citation2015.

43 Murrieta-Flores Citation2012; Citation2013; Tabik et al Citation2015.

44 Schneider and Robbins Citation2009.

45 Edwards Citation1987, 352–61.

46 Baker and Brookes Citation2015b; Brookes Citation2013; Hindle Citation2015; Malim Citation2007; Reynolds and Langlands Citation2011.

47 Herzog Citation2010, 433.

48 Murrieta-Flores Citation2012, 131.

49 Wheatley and Gillings Citation2002, 181.

50 Gillings and Wheatley Citation2001; Frieman and Gillings Citation2007; Llobera Citation2007a, Citation2007b; Wheatley Citation2014.

51 Kirton Citation2015; Reynolds and Langlands Citation2011, 421–2.

52 Conolly and Lake Citation2006, 225–33; Wheatley and Gillings Citation2002, 205.

53 Wheatley Citation1995; Wheatley and Gillings Citation2002, 202–16.

54 Stewart Citation1998; Tabik et al Citation2011; Lindsay Citation2014; Tabik et al Citation2015.

56 Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust Citation2015b.

57 Hankinson Citation2002; Silvester and Hankinson Citation2002.

58 Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 414–24; Hill Citation2000, 202–3; Worthington Citation1997; Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 270–72.

59 Hayes and Malim Citation2008, 173.

60 Worthington Citation1997; Swallow Citation2016.

61 Williams and Murrieta-Flores Citationforthcoming.

62 Compare Reynolds and Langlands Citation2011.

63 Ibid, 419–23.

64 Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust Citation2015b.

65 Baker and Brookes Citation2015b.

66 Hill and Worthington Citation2003, 99.

67 Simpson Citation1853, 57, 66, 74.

68 Cf Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 122–63.

69 Brookes Citation2013, 44; Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 156–63, 228–51; 350–64.

70 Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 194–98; 275–83.

71 While admitting the challenges of confirming the locations of gateways through Offa’s Dyke, Ray and Bapty (Citation2016, 228–51) propose convincing potential instances.

72 Malim Citation2007; Ray and Bapty Citation2016, Williams and Murrieta-Flores Citationforthcoming.

73 Brookes Citation2013, 44.

74 Hill and Worthington Citation2003, although now also see Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 244–50.

75 Insley Citation2012, 127.

76 Noble Citation1983; see also Hill Citation2000, 182; Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 78.

77 Edwards et al Citationforthcoming.

78 Edwards Citation2013a, 104.

79 Ibid, 104, 328.

80 Baker and Brookes Citation2015b.

81 Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 422; Gelling Citation1992, 113–14; Hill and Worthington Citation2003, 46, 173–80; Molyneaux Citation2011, 249; Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 266–67.

82 Gelling Citation1992, 112–18; Molyneaux Citation2011, 251.

83 Molyneaux Citation2011, 269.

84 Besly Citation2006, 702; Redknap Citation2007; Molyneaux Citation2011, 2072.

85 Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 344–46.

86 Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 426.

87 Ray and Bapty Citation2016, 254–97.

88 Edwards Citation2013a, 114.

89 Ingram Citation1912a, 822, 828; Kirby Citation2002, 154.

90 Bailey Citation2010, 34; Edwards Citation2013a, 329.

91 Charles-Edwards Citation2013, 418–19.

92 Edwards et al Citationforthcoming.

93 Baker and Brookes Citation2015b.

94 Edwards Citation2009, 168–9.

95 Baker Citation2011; Baker and Brookes Citation2015a, 12–18; Baker and Brookes Citation2015b for the reuse of hillforts as lookout points in Anglo-Saxon England.

96 Hill Citation2001, 177.

97 Cf Malim Citation2007, 27–32.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 311.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.