SUMMARY: We discuss results of a content analysis of material culture articles in Post-Medieval Archaeology in the context of the development of historical archaeology as a discipline. We conclude that the journal remains an important outlet for detailed field reports, but in recent years, influenced by social and anthropological theories, the discipline has matured and articles have changed from antiquarian artefact presentations to contextualized material culture studies. Expansion of the journal’s temporal frame to include the recent past has so far had little effect, but the journal has benefited from the broadened international range of articles and the intellectual and theoretical backgrounds they convey.
Résumé
Nous discutons de l’analyse de contenu de la culture matérielle traitée dans des articles parus dans PMA, dans le contexte du développement de l'archéologie historique en tant que discipline. Nous concluons que le journal reste un moyen de diffusion important pour des rapports de terrain détaillés. Cependant, ces dernières années, influencée par les théories sociales et anthropologiques, la discipline a mûri et les articles ont alors évolué, passant de présentations d'artefacts anciens à des études contextualisées de la culture matérielle. L'agrandissement du cadre temporel de la revue pour prendre en compte le passé récent n'a pour l'instant pas eu trop d'impact, mais le journal a bénéficié d'un accroissement du nombre d'articles internationaux et des contextes intellectuels et théoriques qu'ils impliquent.
Zusammenfassung
In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Ergebnisse einer Inhaltsanalyse von Sachkultur-Artikeln der Zeitschrift „Post-Medieval Archaeology“ im Kontext der Entwicklung des Faches Historische Archäologie. Wir kommen zu dem Ergebnis, dass die Zeitschrift ein wichtiges Medium für detaillierte Grabungsberichte ist, in den vergangenen 15 Jahren allerdings unter dem Einfluss von Theorien aus Sozialwissenschaft und Anthropologie deutlich gereift ist. Seitdem haben sich Beiträge von eher antiquarischen Objektvorlagen hin zu kontextualisierten Sachkulturstudien entwickelt. Während allerdings die Ausweitung der zeitlichen Obergrenze der Zeitschrift bis hin zur jüngsten Vergangenheit bis heute mehr oder weniger wirkungslos blieb, hat die Zeitschrift deutlich von den vermehrten internationalen Beiträgen sowie den dazugehörigen intellektuellen und theoretischen Ansätzen profitiert.
Riassunti
Discutiamo i risultati dell’analisi del contenuto degli articoli sulla cultura materiale pubblicati in Post-Medieval Archaeology, contestualmente allo sviluppo dell’archeologia storica come disciplina. Giungiamo alla conclusione che la rivista resta un importante vetrina per dettagliate relazioni dei lavori sul campo, ma negli ultimi anni, grazie all’influenza delle teorie sociali e antropologiche, la disciplina è maturata e gli articoli sono cambiati, passando dall’essere presentazioni di reperti considerati di antiquariato a studi contestualizzati di cultura materiale. L’ampliamento dell’ambito cronologico della rivista, fino ad includere il passato più recente, ha finora avuto scarsi risultati, ma vi sono stati benefici dall’ampliamento internazionale nella provenienza degli articoli, e dall’apporto intellettuale e teorico che questo comporta.
Resumen
Este artículo presenta los resultados de un análisis de contenido de los artículos que sobre cultura material se han publicado en Post-Medieval Archaeology dentro del desarrollo de la arqueología histórica como disciplina. Llegamos a la conclusión de que la revista sigue siendo un medio importante donde publicar informes de campo detallados, pero se nota que la disciplina ha ido madurado en los últimos años bajo la influencia de las teorías sociales y antropológicas, y los artículos han pasado de presentar hallazgos materiales a incluir estudios de cultura material más contextualizados. La expansión del marco temporal de la revista, que ahora incluye el pasado reciente, ha tenido hasta ahora poca repercusión, pero la revista se ha beneficiado de la gama más amplia de artículos internacionales y de los antecedentes intelectuales y teóricos que éstos transmiten.
Acknowledgements
We thank Alasdair Brooks, editor of Post-Medieval Archaeology, for inviting us to contribute to the 50th anniversary issue of the journal and for generously providing us with advice and research assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on how to improve upon our initial draft.
7 Hicks Citation2010, 28; Hicks & Beaudry, Citation2010a, 2–3. In the past decade, important works on material culture studies and their place in archaeology, anthropology and history were published, such as Tilley et al. Citation2006 and Hicks & Beaudry, Citation2010a.
8 For Table , we restricted consideration to the first 48 volumes of the journal because the count was made prior to the publication of Vol. 49:1 and because it seemed inappropriate once that issue appeared to treat it as if it were an entire volume. We do, however, discuss items from Vol. 49:1 in our examination of recent developments in the journal.
9 Given that the number of articles in each issue of the journal is dependent on a number of factors (e.g. number of articles ready for publication, length of articles in each issue/page length restrictions per issue, etc.) we felt that calculating overall percentages of artefact/material culture articles versus those on other topics dealt with over the journal’s history would not prove particularly helpful.
19PMA began as an annual single volume; it published two issues of each volume from 2003 to 2013 and, beginning in 2014, three issues per year, the third devoted to an overview of fieldwork and to reviews, making even more room for research articles in issues 1 and 2 of subsequent volumes.
39 See Schacht Citation2010 for a content analysis of Australasian Historical Archaeology. To our knowledge no similar analysis exists for Historical Archaeology.
Yentsch, A.E. 1991, ‘Chesapeake artefacts and their cultural context: Pottery and the food domain’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.25, 25–72.10.1179/pma.1991.002
Jeffries, N. & Major, N. 2015, ‘Mid 17th- and 19th-century English wine bottles with seals in London’s archaeological collections’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.49:1, 131–55.10.1179/0079423615Z.00000000075
Willmott, H. 2001, ‘A group of 17th-century glass goblets with restored stems: Considering the archaeology of repair’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.35:1, 96–105.10.1179/pma.2001.004
Telfer, A., et al. 2006, ‘Rich refuse: A rare find of late 17th-century and mid-18th-century glass and tin-glazed wares from an excavation at the National Gallery, London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.40:1, 191–213.10.1179/174581306X143098
Noël Hume, A. 1970, ‘English clay tobacco pipes bearing the royal arms from Williamsburg, Virginia’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.4, 141–6.10.1179/pma.1970.004
Robinson, P. 1999, ‘Some copper alloy objects from the West Country depicting the arms of the commonwealth’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.33, 285–7.10.1179/pma.1999.011
Bradley, J.W. 1980, ‘Dutch bale seals from 17th-century Onondaga Iroquois sites in New York state’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.14, 197–200.10.1179/pma.1980.011
Gaimster, D., Boland, P., Linnane, S. & Cartwright, C. 1996, ‘The archaeology of private life: the Dudley Castle condoms’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.30, 129–42.10.1179/pma.1996.003
Telfer, A., et al. 2006, ‘Rich refuse: A rare find of late 17th-century and mid-18th-century glass and tin-glazed wares from an excavation at the National Gallery, London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.40:1, 191–213.10.1179/174581306X143098
Watson, S., et al. 2010, ‘Taverns and other entertainments in the City of London? Seventeenth- and 18th-century finds from excavations at Paternoster Square’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.44:1, 172–208.10.1179/174581310X12662382629337
Killock, D., et al. 2005, ‘Pottery as plunder: A 17th-century maritime site in Limehouse, London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.39:1, 1–91.10.1179/007943205X53363
Brooks, A. & Rodríguez Y., A.C. 2012, ‘A Venezuelan household clearance assemblage of 19th-century British ceramics in international perspective’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.46:1, 70–88.10.1179/0079423612Z.0000000004
Coleman-Smith, R., Kiser, R.T. & Hughes, M.J. 2005, ‘Donyatt-type pottery in 17th- and 18th-century Virginia and Maryland’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.39:2, 294–310.10.1179/007943205X62679
Beaudry, M.C. 1989, ‘A seventeenth-century delftware figurine from landfill in Boston, Massachusetts’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.23, 21–3.10.1179/pma.1989.005
Pearce, J. 1998, ‘A rare delftware Hebrew plate and associated assemblage from an excavation in Mitre Street, City of London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol., 32, 95–112.10.1179/pma.1998.006
Willmott, H. & Davies, G. 2004, ‘A group of decorated ceramic beer-pump handles from Sheffield’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.38:2, 226–8.10.1179/pma.2004.008
White, H. 2012, ‘The problem of provenancing English post-medieval slipwares: A chemical and petrographic approach’, Post-Medieval Archaeology46:1, 56–69.10.1179/0079423612Z.0000000003
Killock, D., Brown, J. & Jarrett, C. 2003, ‘The industrialization of an ecclesiastical hamlet: Stoneware production in Lambeth and the sanitary revolution’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.37:1, 29–78.10.1179/pma.2003.003
Jarrett, C. & Thompson, G. 2012, ‘A group of early 20th-century naval victualling finds from Royal Clarence Yard, Gosport, Hampshire’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.46:1, 89–115.10.1179/0079423612Z.0000000005
Belcher, J. & Jarrett, M.G. 1971, ‘Stem-bore diameters of English clay pipes: Some northern evidence’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.5, 191–3.10.1179/pma.1971.010
Sikes, K. 2008, ‘Stars as social space? Contextualizing 17th-century Chesapeake star-motif pipes’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.42:1, 75–103.10.1179/174581308X354029
Mehler, N. 2009, ‘The archaeology of mercantilism: Clay tobacco pipes in Bavaria and their contribution to an economic system’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.43:2, 261–81.10.1179/174581309X12560423034994
Mehler, N. 2009, ‘The archaeology of mercantilism: Clay tobacco pipes in Bavaria and their contribution to an economic system’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.43:2, 261–81.10.1179/174581309X12560423034994
Walker, I.C. 1976, ‘Churchwarden clay tobacco-pipes and the southorn pipemaking family of Broseley, Shropshire’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.10, 142–9.10.1179/pma.1976.008
Noël Hume, A. 1970, ‘English clay tobacco pipes bearing the royal arms from Williamsburg, Virginia’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.4, 141–6.10.1179/pma.1970.004
Atkinson, D.R. & Oswald, A. 1972, ‘A brief guide for the identification of dutch clay tobacco pipes found in England’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.6, 175–82.10.1179/pma.1972.006
Funari, P.P., Zarankin, A. & Salerno, M. (eds) 2010, Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America, New York: Springer.
Mehler, N. 2015, ‘Die Archäologie des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts zwischen Akzeptanz und Relevanz’, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Archäologie des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit28, 23–8.
Yentsch, A.E. 1991, ‘Chesapeake artefacts and their cultural context: Pottery and the food domain’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.25, 25–72.10.1179/pma.1991.002
Vionis, A.K. 2005, ‘Domestic material culture and post-medieval archaeology in Greece: A case-study from the Cyclades Islands’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.39:1, 172–85.10.1179/007943205X53408
Coleman-Smith, R., Kiser, R.T. & Hughes, M.J. 2005, ‘Donyatt-type pottery in 17th- and 18th-century Virginia and Maryland’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.39:2, 294–310.10.1179/007943205X62679
Mytum, H. 2006, ‘Popular attitudes to memory, the body, and social identity: The rise of external commemoration in Britain, Ireland and New England’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.40:1, 96–110.10.1179/174581306X143061
De Clercq, W., et al. 2007, ‘Living in times of war: waste of c. 1600 from two garderobe chutes in the castle of Middelburg-in-Flanders (Belgium)’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.41:1, 1–63.
Gutiérrez, A. 2007, ‘Portuguese coarsewares in early modern England: Reflections on an exceptional pottery assemblage from Southampton’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.41:1, 64–79.10.1179/174581307X236139
Sikes, K. 2008, ‘Stars as social space? Contextualizing 17th-century Chesapeake star-motif pipes’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.42:1, 75–103.10.1179/174581308X354029
Wilson, R.J. 2008, ‘“The mystical character of commodities”: The consumer society in 18th-century England’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.42:1, 144–56.10.1179/174581308X354038
Parker, G. 2013, ‘Complexity and diversity: Domestic material culture and French immigrant identity in early modern London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.47:1, 66–82.10.1179/0079423613Z.00000000025
Gaimster, D. 2012, ‘The Geoff Egan Memorial Lecture 2011 Artefacts, art and artifice: reconsidering iconographic sources for archaeological objects in early modern Europe’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.46:2, 304–19.10.1179/0079423612Z.00000000015
Straube, B.A. 2013, ‘The Geoff Egan Memorial Lecture 2012: Surprises from the soil: Archaeological discoveries from England’s first successful transatlantic colony at Jamestown’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.47:2, 263–80.
Willemsen, A. 2015, ‘The Geoff Egan Memorial Lecture 2013; Taking up the glove: finds, uses, and meanings of gloves, mittens and gauntlets in western Europe, c. AD 1300–1700’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.49:1, 263–80.
Schreg, R. 2010, ‘Panamanian coarse handmade earthenware – a melting pot of African, American and European traditions?’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.44:1, 135–64.10.1179/174581310X12662382629256
Nordin, J. 2012, ‘Embodied colonialism: The cultural meaning of silver in a Swedish colonial context in the 17th century’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.46:1, 143–65.10.1179/0079423612Z.0000000007
Schweickart, E. 2014, ‘Ideologies of consumption: Colonialism and the commodification of goods in 18th-century Virginian and Lowland Scottish rural households’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.48:2, 398–411.10.1179/0079423614Z.00000000063
Gaimster, D., Boland, P., Linnane, S. & Cartwright, C. 1996, ‘The archaeology of private life: the Dudley Castle condoms’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.30, 129–42.10.1179/pma.1996.003
Parker, G. 2013, ‘Complexity and diversity: Domestic material culture and French immigrant identity in early modern London’, Post-Medieval Archaeol.47:1, 66–82.10.1179/0079423613Z.00000000025