Tabish Shah (2013) Modernization as Westernization? The geopolitical consequences of ethno-nationalism analyzed through Russian Art
Nationalities Papers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.755506
When the above article was first published online on 19 April 2013, some text was missing on page 13. After the sentence “Essentially, the inductive bias of the majority-population individuals embedded by the conflation leads their views of non-majority individuals; there is confusion due to the presence of ethnicity and religion in the individual and the actual identity of the citizen and their values, and this causes the majority population to view citizens with those backgrounds in the same way they would view non-citizens and assume their values are the same and/or that their attributes correlate to what the discourse has embedded concerning their ethno-religious background.” the following text should have been included:
“These effects are contravened in multi-ethnic contexts where there is a strong overarching national identity discourse formulated without ethno-nationalism, such as in the United States, because the inductive bias of citizens consists of attaching traits to the collective national identity rather than the ethnicity. This means that their inductive bias is either that of sub-consciously comprehending the separation between genealogy and universal character traits in other citizens or their inductive bias if initially present involving associating traits with ethnic backgrounds can be more easily overridden if they interact with citizens that do not match it. Essentially, biases are much less established and individuals are more likely to be viewed as individuals.”
The next paragraph should then begin “The issues that arise from conflating modernisation and westernisation are two fold:”
This has now been corrected online. Taylor & Francis apologises for this error.