1,081
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

‘You get in a hole, it’s like quicksand’: a grounded theory analysis of social support amid materially bounded decision-making processesFootnote*

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 237-259 | Received 02 Mar 2018, Accepted 12 Jan 2019, Published online: 20 May 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Financial precarity is a reality for a significant portion of the U.S. population. The inability of people to live sustainably has wide-ranging ramifications for individuals, families, communities, and larger society. The lived experiences of those in low-income financial precarity is perpetually threatened and constrained from a material standpoint. In this grounded theory research, we analyzed the perceived manifestation of social support during financially precarious decision-making. This study contributes the notion of materially bounded decision-making as a theoretical concept that foregrounds the role of materiality in decision-making processes. The analysis revealed uncertainty, urgency, complexity, and risk as the underlying context for materially bounded decision-making. Depending on the strength or weakness of participants’ social support systems, the trajectory of decision-making processes changes, leading to two dominant decision-making pathways. Results indicated that at times communicative social support intervention provided a sense of temporary stability.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers, Editor Dr. Debbie S. Dougherty, and Dr. Tracy Russo, a friendly reviewer, for their helpful feedback on this manuscript. We also appreciate our collaborator United Community Services of Johnson County, specifically Kathryn Evans Madden and Dr. Marilu Goodyear. Finally, we want to express gratitude to our study participants. Your voices are important and your stories are meaningful. Thank you for sharing your stories with us.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

* An earlier version of this manuscript was presented at the 2017 National Communication Association annual convention in Dallas, TX.

1. Note that appraisal support did not emerge in our data.

Additional information

Funding

This investigation was supported in part by funds from the United Community Services of Johnson County, their Employment Planning Project work team partners, and the University of Kansas New Faculty General Research Fund allocation # 2302106.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 192.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.