Psychiatric medication preferences of sports psychiatrists

ABSTRACT

Objectives: When prescribing psychiatric medications to athletes, it is important to consider issues that are especially important for this population, including side effects, safety concerns, and anti-doping policies. Only one report, from 2000, describes the prescribing preferences of psychiatrists who work with athletes. This manuscript aims to update the findings from that report, so as to help inform prescribing practices of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, and other clinicians who work with athletes.

Methods: Physician members of the International Society for Sports Psychiatry (ISSP) were sent an email invitation in 2016 to complete an anonymous web-based survey on psychiatric medication prescribing preferences in working with athletes with a variety of mental health conditions.

Results: Forty of 100 (40%) members of the ISSP who identified as physicians and who were emailed the survey ultimately completed it. Top choices of psychiatric medications for athletes across categories assessed included: bupropion for depression without anxiety and without bipolar spectrum disorder; escitalopram for generalized anxiety disorder; melatonin for insomnia; atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; lamotrigine for bipolar spectrum disorders; and aripiprazole for psychotic disorders.

Conclusion: Prescribers of psychiatric medications for athletes tended to favor medications that are relatively more energizing and less likely to cause sedation, weight gain, cardiac side effects, and tremor. Additionally, prescribing preferences for athletes diverged from many of the prescribing trends seen for patients within the general population, in keeping with the assumption that different factors are considered when prescribing for athletes versus for the general population.

KEYWORDS:

• Psychiatry
• athletes
• mental health
• drug prescriptions

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the ISSP Board members who provided feedback on and piloting of the survey instrument used, and the ISSP membership for their participation in the survey.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Additional information

Funding

This article was not funded.