Impact of repeated sportive chokes on carotid intima media thickness and brain injury biomarkers in grappling athletes

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Vascular neck compression techniques, referred to as ‘chokes’ in combat sports, reduce cerebral perfusion, causing loss of consciousness or voluntary submission by the choked athlete. Despite these chokes happening millions of times yearly around the world, there is scant research on their long-term effects. This pilot study evaluated whether repeated choking in submission grappling impacts the carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) and brain injury biomarkers (NFL, hGFAP, t-Tau, and UCH-L1).

Methods

Participants (n = 39, 29 male; ages 27–60 years) were assigned to one of two study arms: Grapplers (n = 20, 15 male) and 19 age/sex/body size matched controls. Grapplers had been exposed to >500 choke events while training for >5 years in a choke-inclusive sport. Exclusion criteria were recent TBI or deficits from a past TBI or stroke. Bilateral ultrasound measurement of the CIMT was performed, and blood was collected for quantitative analysis of four brain injury markers. Subgroup analyses were performed within the Grappler group to account for blunt head trauma as a possible confounder.

Results

There was no overall difference in CIMT measurements between Grapplers (mean 0.55 mm, SD 0.07) and Controls (mean 0.57 mm, SD 0.10) p = 0.498 [95% CI −0.04–0.08], nor were there CIMT differences between Grappler subgroups of blunt Trauma and No-Trauma. There were no significant differences in any biomarkers comparing Grapplers and Controls or comparing Grappler subgroups of Trauma and No-Trauma.

Conclusion

This study found no significant difference in CIMT and serum brain injury biomarkers between controls and grapplers with extensive transient choke experience, nor between grapplers with extensive past blunt head trauma and those without.

KEYWORDS:

• Jiu jitsu
• stroke
• judo
• brain injury
• strangulation
• ultrasound

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded through a Spinal Cord and Traumatic Brain Injury research grant awarded by the State of Minnesota Office of Higher Education (#191502).