1,577
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Treatment of Female Sexual Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review

, , , &
Pages 99-142 | Published online: 07 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

Sexual pain disorders affect women's sexual and reproductive health and are poorly understood. Although many treatments have been evaluated, there is no one “gold standard” treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate what treatments for female sexual pain have been evaluated in clinical studies and their effectiveness. The search strategy resulted in 65 papers included in this review. The articles were divided into the following categories: medical treatments; surgical treatments; physical therapies; psychological therapies; comparative treatment studies; and miscellaneous and combined treatments. Topical and systemic medical treatments have generally been found to lead to improvements in, but not complete relief of, pain, and side effects are quite common. Surgical procedures have demonstrated very high success rates, although there has been variability in complete relief of pain after surgery, which suggests less invasive treatments should be considered first. Physical therapies and psychological therapies have been shown to be promising treatments, supporting a biopsychosocial approach to sexual pain disorders. Although most of the interventions described have been reported as effective, many women still experience pain. A multidisciplinary team with active patient involvement may be needed to optimize treatment outcome.

Notes

The term vulvar vestibulitis is only used here when we discuss earlier studies where researchers employed this term to refer to participant inclusion criteria.

For this review, the term “sexual pain” is used throughout because the focus is on treating pain associated with sexual activity. It is acknowledged that other aspects of pelvic pain/vulvar pain (e.g., daily pain, discomfort, difficulty with daily activities) are also important.

Because of space constraints, the detailed results from application of the Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria are not presented but are available from the authors upon request.

Table 1 Summary of Studies

Figure 1 Flow of papers during the selection process (duplicates were automatically removed from the search results by the database). Records refer to the total number of search results retrieved from the databases.
Figure 1 Flow of papers during the selection process (duplicates were automatically removed from the search results by the database). Records refer to the total number of search results retrieved from the databases.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 193.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.