167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Quotients in super-symmetry: formal supergroup case

&
Pages 4075-4092 | Received 30 Nov 2023, Accepted 27 Mar 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

Abstract

We describe the structure of the quotient G/H of a formal supergroup G by its formal sub-supergroup H. This is a consequence which arises as a continuation of the authors’ work (partly with M. Hoshi) on algebraic/analytic supergoups. The results are presented and proved in terms of super-cocommutative Hopf superalgebras. The notion of co-free super-coalgebras plays a role, in particular.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:

1 Introduction

1.1 Background and objective

The quotient G/H of a group G by its subgroup H is the set of all H-orbits in G. This simple fact for abstract groups immediately turns into a difficult question if we replace abstract groups with groups with geometric structure, such as algebraic or analytic groups. Does the question become even more difficult when we consider those geometric groups in the generalized supersymmetric context, or namely, supergroups? The authors want to answer that it is not so difficult as was supposed, not so much more than that for geometric (non-super) groups. For we can describe the structure of the quotient G/H for supergroups in terms of the non-super quotient Gev/Hev, where Gev (resp., Hev) is the geometric (non-super) group naturally associated with the supergroup G (resp., H). Indeed, such a description has been given by the authors [Citation12, Theorem 4.12, Remark 4.13] for affine algebraic supergroups (see also [Citation14, Section 14.2] for non-affine case) and by Hoshi and the authors [Citation5, Theorem 7.3, Remark 7.4 (1)] for analytic supergroups.

A main objective of this paper is to give such a description for formal supergroups. Those formal supergroups (or resp., formal superschemes) form a category which is equivalent to the category of super-cocommutative Hopf superalgebras (resp., super-coalgebras), as is shown in Appendix below. In the text the results all are presented in terms of such Hopf superalgebras and super-coalgebras, some of which will be translated into the language of formal super-objects in the Appendix.

1.2 Main results

Throughout in this paper we work over a fixed base field k whose characteristic chark is not 2. The unadorned ⊗ denotes the tensor product over k. Except at the beginning part of the following Section 2 we always assume super-coalgebras and Hopf superalgebras to be super-cocommutative. Compare this situation with that in [Citation12], where the authors discussed super-commutative Hopf superalgebras in order to investigate affine algebraic supergroups; some arguments of the present paper are in fact dual to those of the cited article.

Let G=Sp*(J) be a formal superscheme; the notation means that it corresponds to a super-coalgebra J. It is known that J includes the largest ordinary subcoalgebra, say, J. The formal scheme Gev naturally associated to G is the one corresponding to J, or in notation, Gev=Sp*(J). Suppose that G is a formal supergroup, which means that J is a Hopf superalgebra. Then J is a Hopf subalgebra of J. Let H=Sp*(K) be a formal sub-supergroup of G, or equivalently, let K be a Hopf sub-superalgebra of J. The associated formal group Hev=Sp*(K) is then a formal subgroup of Gev, or equivalently, K is a Hopf subalgebra of J. The quotient formal superscheme G/H corresponds to the quotient super-coalgebra J//K:=J/JK+ of J by the super-coideal JK+ which is generated, as a left super-ideal, by the augmentation super-ideal K+ of K; or in notation, G/H=Sp*(J//K).

The associated formal scheme (G/H)ev is proved to be naturally isomorphic to Gev/Hev (see Corollary 4.7), whence we have (G/H)ev=Sp*(J//K).

Let VJ=P(J)1 denote the vector space consisting of all odd primitive elements of J, which is in fact a left J-module under the adjoint J-action. Similarly we have the left K-module VK=P(K)1 consisting of all odd primitive elements of K, which is seen to be a K-submodule of VJ, so that we have the quotient K-module Q:=VJ/VK of VJ by VK. A main result of ours (Theorem 4.6 (1)) states that there is an isomprphism (1.1) JK(Q)J//K(1.1) of super-coalgebras, which turns into (1.2) J//K(Q)J//K,(1.2) in many special cases including the case where J is pointed; see Proposition 4.4. Notice that the exterior algebra (Q) is naturally a Hopf superalgebra in which every element of Q is odd primitive, and it is regarded naturally as a left K-module super-coalgebra for (1.1), and simply as a super-coalgebra for (1.2).

A description of J//K which looks similar to (1.2) is given by [Citation9, Proposition 3.14 (1)] under the assumption that J is irreducible, or namely, the coradical of J is k1. But, our method of the proof is more conceptual, which uses the notion of co-free super-coalgebras (see Definition 3.4 for precise definition) and proves on the course that JK(Q) and J//K(Q) are co-free; see Proposition 4.3 and Example 3.8. Furthermore, we obtain from (1.1) the smoothness criteria (Theorem 4.8): (1) J//K is smooth if and only if so is J//K, (2) The equivalent conditions are necessarily satisfied if char k=0.

Throughout we will use Hopf-algebraic techniques; in particular, a key step to prove (1.1) is to show a Maschke-type result such as found in [Citation3]; see Lemma 4.1. The techniques are so useful that we will work mostly in the Hopf-algebra language, not in the group-theoretical one. They also make it easier to investigate the associated graded object. Indeed, we obtain a description of the graded coalgebra gr(J//K) associated to J//K; see Theorem 4.6 (2).

1.3 Organization of the paper

Section 2 is devoted to preliminaries, which contain basic definitions and results on supersymmetry and Hopf superalgebras. Section 3 discusses co-free super-coalgebras. Section 4 presents main results and their proofs. Appendix discusses formal superschemes and supergroups from scratch, and translates some of the results obtained in the text into the language of those formal super-objects.

2 Preliminaries

2.1 Supersymmetry

A super-vector space is a vector space V=V0V1 (over k) graded by the order-2 group Z2={0,1}. It is said to be purely even (resp., purely odd) if V=V0 (resp., V=V1). The super-vector spaces V,W, form a monoidal category, SModk=(SModk, , k), with respect to the natural tensor product ⊗ over k, and the unit object k which is supposed to be purely even. This monoidal category is symmetric with respect to the supersymmetry (2.1) cV,W:VWWV,vw(1)|v||w|wv,(2.1) where vV and wW are homogeneous elements with the parities (or degrees) |v|,|w|, respectively.

Objects, such as (co)algebra, Hopf algebra or Lie algebra, constructed in SModk are called so as super-(co)algebra, Hopf superalgebra or Lie superalgebra, with “super” thus attached. Ordinary objects, such as ordinary (co)algebra, …, are regarded as purely even super-objects.

If char k=3, a Lie superalgebra g is required to satisfy [v,[v,v]]=0,vg1, in addition to the alternativity and the Jacobi identity formulated in the super context.

Useful references for algebra and geometry in the supersymmetric context include Carmeli et al. [Citation1] and Manin [Citation6].

2.2 Super-coalgebras and Hopf superalgebras

In what follows super-coalgebras are assumed to be super-cocommutative. Accordingly, Hopf superalgebras are so, as well.

For a super-coalgebra J, the structure is denoted by ΔJ:JJJ,εJ:Jk, or simply by Δ,ε. The coproduct Δ is presented so as Δ(a)=a(1)a(2),aJ by this variant of the Heynemann-Sweedler notation. The super-cocommutativity assumption is presented by Δ=cJ,J°Δ. In case J is a Hopf superalgebra, the antipode is denoted by SJ or S.

A graded coalgebra is a non-negatively graded coalgebra J=n0J(n) which, regarded as a super-coalgebra J=J0J1 with respect to the parity Ji={n evenJ(n),i=0,n oddJ(n),i=1 is super-cocommutative. A graded Hopf superalgebra is a graded super-coalgebra, equipped with a graded-algebra structure, which is a Hopf superalgebra with respect to the parity as above.

2.3 The exterior algebra

Let V be a purely odd super-vector space.

The exterior algebra (V)=n0n(V) on V is a graded algebra, and is in fact a graded Hopf superalgebra in which every element vV (=1(V)) is primitive, Δ(v)=1v+v1; this is super-commutative as well as super-cocommutative.

In what follows, (V) will be often regarded only as a graded coalgebra or a super-coalgebra. To give an alternative description of that structure, first notice that given an integer n > 1, the symmetric group Sn of degree n acts on the n-fold tensor product Vn of V, so that the ith fundamental transposition (i,i+1) acts as idV(i1)cV,VidV(ni1), where 1i<n. We suppose that Sn acts on the right, so that the action is given explicitly by (v1v2vn)σ=sgn(σ)vσ(1)vσ(2)vσ(n), where σSn and viV, 1in. Let (2.2) An(V):=(Vn)Sn(2.2)

denote the subspace of Vn consisting of all Sn-invariants. The symmetrizer (2.3) symn:n(V)An(V),v1vnσSn(v1vn)σ(2.3) gives a linear isomorphism; this is to be called the anti-symmetrizer ordinarily in the non-super situation. Let A0(V):=k (=0(V)), A1(V):=V (=1(V)), and set A(V):=n0An(V).

For n0 and 0in, we let (2.4) δi,ni:An(V)Ai(V)Ani(V)(2.4) denote the injection restricted from the canonical linear isomorphism VnViV(ni). The graded-coalgebra structure of (V) is transferred through symn to A(V) as follows: the coproduct is transferred to Δ:A(V)A(V)A(V) defined by Δ(a)=0inδi,ni(a),aAn(V),  n0,

while the counit is to the projection A(V)A0(V)=k. Here, as for Δ one should notice the formula symn(v1vn)=σsgn(σ)symi(vσ(1)vσ(i))symni(vσ(i+1)vσ(n)), where σ runs over the (i,ni)-shuffles, i.e., the permutations such that σ(1)<<σ(i) and σ(i+1)<<σ(n). We can thus identify so as (2.5) (V)=A(V)(2.5) as graded coalgebras.

2.4 The associated graded coalgebra

Let J be a super-coalgebra. The pullback (2.6) J:=Δ1(J0J0)(2.6) of J0J0 (JJ) along the coproduct is the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra of J; see [Citation9, Section 3]. Let F1J=0, F0J=J. For every integer n > 0, let FnJ:=Ker(JΔnJ(n+1)(J/J)(n+1)) be the kernel of the composite of the n-iterated coproduct of J with the natural projection onto (J/J)(n+1). Then J is filtered (see [Citation15, Section 11.1]), or more precisely, we have an ascending chain J=F0JF1JF2J of sub-super-coalgebras of J, such that J=n0FnJ,Δ(FnJ)0inFiJFniJ.

The associated graded coalgebra grJ:=n0FnJ/Fn1J is indeed super-cocommutative.

Suppose that J is a Hopf superalgebra. Then J is a purely even Hopf superalgebra of J, and we have (FnJ)(FmJ)Fn+mJ, n,m0. Moreover, grJ turns into a graded Hopf superalgebra. The super-vector space (2.7) P(J)={vJ|Δ(v)=1v+v1}(2.7) consisting of all primitive elements in J form a Lie superalgebra with respect to the super-commutator [v,w]:=vw(1)|v||w|wv, where v and w are homogeneous elements of P(J). Define (2.8) VJ:=P(J)1,(2.8)

the odd component of the Lie superalgebra. This is stable under the right (resp., left) adjoint J-action (2.9) va:=S(a(1))va(2)(resp.,av:=a(1)vS(a(2))),(2.9) where aJ and vVJ, whence it turns into a right (resp., left) purely odd J-supermodule. Notice that J is a J-ring, by which we mean an algebra equipped with an algebra map from J. With an arbitrarily chosen, totally ordered basis X=(xλ)λΛ of VJ, J is, as a J-ring, generated by X, and defined by the relations (2.10) xλa=a(1)(xλa(2)),xλxμ=xμxλ+[xλ,xμ],(2.10) where aJ and λ>μ in Λ. Moreover, the linear map (2.11) ϕX:J(VJ)J(2.11) defined by ϕX(a1)=a and ϕX(a(xλ1xλn))=axλ1xλn, where n > 0 and λ1<<λn in Λ, is a left J-linear isomorphism of super-coalgebras; see [Citation9, Theorem 3.6]. In particular, JVJ is naturally included in J, (2.12) JVJJ.(2.12)

Remark 2.1.

Theorem 10 of [Citation10] proves a category equivalence between (super-cocommutative) Hopf superalgebras and dual Harish-Chandra pairs. We can make ϕX into a natural isomorphism of Hopf superalgebras, giving to J(VJ) some additional structures that are obtained from the dual Harish-Chandra pair corresponding to J. But, such a more precise description of J will not be needed in the sequel.

Keep the notation as above. The category SModJ=(SModJ, , k) of right J-supermodules is a monoidal category, which is symmetric with respect to the supersymmetry (2.1) due to the cocommutativity of J. The Hopf superalgebra (VJ) is in fact a Hopf algebra in SModJ with respect to the J-action arising from the right adjoint action. The associated smash product J(VJ) is identified with grJ, since the second relation of (2.10) is reduced in grJ to the super-commutativity xλxμ=xμxλ. To be more precise, VJ is naturally isomorphic to P(grJ)1, and the isomorphism together with the inclusion J=(grJ)(0)grJ uniquely extend to a canonical isomorphism (2.13) J(VJ)grJ(2.13) of graded Hopf superalgebras, which in fact coincides with gr(ϕX).

2.5 Quick review of structure of Hopf superalgebras

Let J be a super-coalgebra. Every simple subcoalgebra of the J, which is regarded as an ordinary coalgebra, is purely even. The coradical CoradJ of J is by definition the (necessarily, direct) sum of all simple subcoalgebras; it is seen to be included in the J in (2.6).

Suppose that J is a Hopf superalgebra. We say that J is irreducible if k1 is a unique simple subcoalgebra, or namely, k1=CoradJ. It is known that J includes the largest irreducible Hopf sub-superalgebra denoted by J1. If chark=0, J1 coincides with the universal envelope U(P(J)) of the Lie superalgebra P(J) in (2.7). We say that J is pointed if the simple subcoalgebras of J are all 1-dimensional; this is the case if k is algebraically closed. Suppose that J is pointed. Then the group G(J)={gJ|Δ(g)=gg, ε(g)=1} of the grouplike elements, which all are necessarily even for J being over a field, spans CoradJ. Moreover, J1 is stable under the conjugation by G(J) ag=g1ag,aJ1,  gG(J), and the resulting smash product kG(J)J1 is naturally identified with J.

3 Co-free super-coalgebras

Let C be a super-coalgebra; we remark this symbol shall not express the complex field, which does not appear in this paper. Let V be a super-vector space. Due to the super-cocommutativity of C, every left C-super-comodule structure (or left C-coaction) λ:VCV on V can be identified with a right C-super-comodule structure (or right C-coaction) ρ:VVC through (3.1) λ=cV,C°ρ   or   cC,V°λ=ρ,(3.1)

and vice versa. Notice that (V,λ,ρ) is then a (C,C)-bi-super-comodule in the sense (idCρ)°λ=(λidC)°ρ.

Therefore, given a C-super-comodule, we may regard it as any of left, right and bi-super-comodules, and do not specify which unless it is needed.

Given C-super-comodules V and W, the cotensor product V CW is defined by the equalizer diagram

[[INLINE FIGURE]]where ρV (resp., λV) denotes the right (resp., left) C-coaction on V (resp., W). The left C-coaction on V and the right C-coaction on W give rise to the same (in the super sense as given by (3.1)) coaction onto V CW, with which we regard V CW as a C-super-comodule.

We let SModC denote the category of C-super-comodules; we thus take “right” for this notation. It is easy to see the following.

Lemma 3.1.

SModC forms a monoidal category, (SModC, C, C) whose tensor product is given by the cotensor product C, and whose unit object is C. This is in fact symmetric with respect to the supersymmetry cV,W|VCW:V CWW CV restricted to the cotensor products.

Definition 3.2.

A super-coalgebra over C or C-super-coalgebra is a pair (D,ω) of a super-coalgebra D and a super-coalgebra map ω:DC.

Giving a C-super-coalgebra is the same as giving a coalgebra in (SModC, C, C). To be more precise we have the following.

Lemma 3.3.

If (D,ω) is a C-super-coalgebra, then D, regarded as a C-super-comodule with respect to (idDω)°ΔD:DDC, is a coalgebra in (SModC, C, C) whose coproduct is ΔD:DDD, regarded to be mapping into D CD, and whose counit is ω:DC. Every coalgebra in the category arises uniquely in this way.

Proof.

Given a coalgebra D in the category, its coproduct DD CDDD composed with the embedding into DD, and its counit DCεCk composed with the counit of C make D into a super-coalgebra. This super-coalgebra, paired with the counit DC in the category, is made into a C-super-coalgebra. This construction is seen to be an inverse procedure of the construction given in the lemma. □

Let C be a (cocommutative) coalgebra, and let V be a purely odd C-super-comodule. We emphasize that C is supposed to be purely even, and V purely odd.

Definition 3.4.

A C-super-coalgebra on V is a pair (D,π) of a C-super-coalgebra D and a C-super-colinear map π:DV. The C-super-coalgebras on V form a category, whose morphisms are C-colinear super-coalgebra maps compatible with the maps to V. A C-super-coalgebra (D,π) on V is said to be co-free if it is a terminal object of the category, or more explicitly, if given a C-super-coalgebra (E,ϖ) on V, there exists a unique morphism (E,ϖ)(D,π) of C-super-coalgebras on V.

Proposition 3.5.

There exists uniquely (up to isomorphism) a co-free C-super-coalgebra on V.

Proof.

The uniqueness is obvious. Let us construct explicitly a desired (D,π), which is in fact graded, D=n0D(n), as a coalgebra. We write simply for C. Let D(0):=C,D(1):=V.

Let n > 1. Notice that the cotensor product Vn=VV of n copies of V is stable under the Sn-action. Define D(n):=(Vn)Sn (=VnAn(V)) to be the C-sub-comodule consisting of all Sn-invariants in Vn, which equals VnAn(V) in Vn. We let V0=C (=D(0)), V1=V (=D(1)).

Let n0 and 0in. We see that the canonical C-super-colinear isomorphisms VnViV(ni) restrict to D(n)D(i)D(ni), which we denote by Δi,ni; cf. (2.4) in the case where 0<i<n. Define a C-super-colinear map Δ:DDD by Δ(a)=0inΔi,ni(a),aD(n), n0.

Let ε:DD(0)=C be the projection. Then we see that (D,Δ,ε) is a (graded) C-super-coalgebra; cf. the graded-coalgebra structure of A(V) given in Section 2.3.

We wish to prove that this D, paired with the projection π:DD(1)=V, is co-free. Given a C-super-coalgebra (E,ϖ) on V, let us construct C-super-colinear maps fn:ED(n), n0. Let f0:ED(0)=C,f1:ED(1)=V be the super-coalgebra map equipped to E, and be ϖ, respectively. For n > 1, define fn:ED(n) to be the composite (3.2) E(ΔE)n¯1EnϖnVn,(3.2) where (ΔE)n1 denote the (n1)-iterated coproduct ΔE of E. This composite indeed maps into D(n)(=(Vn)Sn), since E is super-cocommutative. Since the coradical Corad E of E is purely even, and is, therefore, killed by ϖ, it follows that for every aE, we have fn(a)=0 for sufficiently large n. Thus we can define f:ED by f(a)=n0fn(a),aE.

One sees that this f is a unique morphism ED of C-super-coalgebras on V. Indeed, it is easy to see that f is compatible with the counits. Let n > 1. To see that f is compatible with the coproducts, one should use the formula Δi,ni°fn=(fifni)°ΔE, where 0in. For the uniqueness one should use the fact that the composite DΔn¯1DnπnVn=D(n) coincides with the projection DD(n). □

We denote the thus constructed, co-free C-super-coalgebra on V by coFC(V).

We emphasize that this is graded so that (3.3) coFC(V)(0)=C,coFC(V)(1)=V(3.3) and the associated map to V is the projection onto the first component. In addition, the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra of coFC(V) is C, as is seen from (2.6) and the construction above.

Example 3.6.

Let us be in the special case where C is the trivial coalgebra k spanned by a grouplike element, and V is, therefore, a purely odd super-vector space. Then we have (3.4) coFk(V)=(V)(=A(V); see(2.5)).(3.4)

Remark 3.7.

This fact (3.4) is essentially shown in the second half of the proof of [Citation5, Proposition 3.11] by the authors joint with Hoshi, which, however, contains an error; the composite given on Page 41, line –9, should read CΔn¯1CnπnU1n, which indeed maps into An(U1)(=n(U1)); cf. (3.2).

Example 3.8.

Suppose that C is an arbitrary (cocommutative) coalgebra, and V is co-free, or namely, V=CW, where W is a purely odd super-vector space. We see from the construction in the last proof that (3.5) coFC(CW)=C(W).(3.5)

Notice that (3.4) and (3.5) are identifications of graded coalgebras, as well. The relevant following observation is simple, but will be used in the next section.

Remark 3.9.

In general, given a graded coalgebra D=n0D(n), the neutral component D(0) is a (cocommutative) coalgebra and the first component D(1) is a purely odd D(0)-super-comodule with respect to the relevant component of the coproduct (3.6) ΔD(1)1,0:D(1)D(1)D(0).(3.6)

Therefore, D, paired with the projection onto the neutral component, is a D(0)-super-coalgebra, which in turn, paired with the projection onto the first component, is a D(0)-super-coalgebra on D(1).

Recall from (3.3) that coFC(V) is such a graded coalgebra D with the property (3.7) D(0)=C,D(1)=V.(3.7)

It may be understood, as a C-super-coalgebra on V, to be the one which arises, as above, from its graded-coalgebra structure with the property (3.7). Moreover, it is a terminal object in the category of those graded coalgebras with that property; morphisms in the category are supposed to be identical in degrees 0 and 1.

The notion of smooth (cocommutative) coalgebras (see [Citation16, p. 1521, lines 5–7], [Citation4, Definition 1.4, Proposition 1.5]) is directly generalized in the super context as follows.

An inclusion DE of super-coalgebras is said to be essential if CoradED; see [Citation11, Section 1]. A super-coalgebra D is said to be smooth if every essential inclusion DE of D into another super-coalgebra E splits. The condition is equivalent to saying that given an essential inclusion EE of super-coalgebras, every super-coalgebra map ED extends to some super-coalgebra map ED.

A coalgebra, or a purely even super-coalgebra, is smooth as a coalgebra (in the sense of [Citation4, Citation16]) if and only if it is smooth as a super-coalgebra (in the sense just defined). To see “only if”, one should notice that every super-coalgebra map from a super-coalgebra, say, E to a coalgebra uniquely factors through the quotient purely even super-coalgebra E/E1 (=E0) of E.

If chark=0, then every Hopf algebra is smooth, as is well known, and this fact, combined with the isomorphism given by ϕX in (2.11), proves that every Hopf superalgebra is then smooth; see (the proof of) Theorem 4.8 (2).

Proposition 3.10.

If C is a smooth coalgebra and V is an injective purely odd C-super-comodule, then coFC(V) is smooth.

Proof.

Write D for coFC(V). We are going to prove that an arbitrarily given essential inclusion DE splits under the assumptions. By the smoothness assumption for C, the projection DD(0)=C extends to a super-coalgebra map EC, with which we regard E as a C-super-coalgebra. By the injectivity assumption for V, the projection DD(1)=V extends to a C-super-colinear map EV, which gives rise to a unique C-super-coalgebra map ED on V by the co-freeness of D. The map must be a retraction of the inclusion DE, regarded as a C-super-coalgebra map on V, again by the co-freeness. □

Remark 3.11.

If D is a smooth super-coalgebra, then the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra, say, D of D is smooth, as is easily seen using the fact that every super-coalgebra map from a purely even super-coalgebra to D maps into D. In particular, if coFC(V) is smooth, then C is; see the remark preceding Example 3.6.

4 The quotient J//K

Let J be a Hopf superalgebra, and let K be a Hopf sub-superalgebra of J. Then the left super-ideal JK+ of J generated by the augmentation super-ideal K+=Ker(εK) of K is a super-coideal; see [Citation17, Proposition 1] or [Citation9, p. 286]. We denote the resulting quotient super-coalgebra of J by (4.1) J//K (=J/JK+).(4.1)

If K is a normal Hopf sub-superalgebra, or namely, if JK+=K+J (or equivalently, K is stable under the adjoint J-action, see [Citation9, Theorem 3.10 (3)]), then J//K is a quotient Hopf superalgebra of J, in which case the structure of J//K is rather clear from the results obtained in [Citation10, Section 3]. So, in what follows, main interest of ours will be in the case where K is not normal.

We are going to investigate the structures of this super-coalgebra and of the associated graded coalgebra gr(J//K); the results will be then applied to show smoothness criteria for J//K. One will see easily that parallel results hold for the objects J\\K (=J/K+J), gr(J\\K) analogously constructed with the side switched.

Let J and K be the largest purely even Hopf sub-superalgebras of J and of K (see Section 2.4), and set VJ:=P(J)1,VK:=P(K)1 as in (2.8). These are purely odd right (and left) supermodules over J and over K, respectively; see (2.9). For a while we regard these as ordinary modules, keeping their parity in mind. The natural maps KJ and VKVJ induced from the inclusion KJ are injections, through which we can regard K as a Hopf subalgebra of J, and VK as a K-submodule of VJ.

Define (4.2) Q:=VJ/VK.(4.2)

We let ModK denote the category of right K-modules, which is in fact a symmetric monoidal category, (ModK,,K). Since J is a coalgebra in the category, we have the category (4.3) ModKJ (=(ModK)J)(4.3) of right J-comodules in ModK. We have the short exact sequence 0VKVJQ0

in ModK. Tensored with J, this gives rise to the short exact sequence (4.4) 0JVKJVJJQ0(4.4) in ModKJ, in which K acts diagonally on each tensor product, while J coacts on the single tensor factor J.

Lemma 4.1.

The short exact sequence (4.4) in ModKJ splits.

Proof.

Clearly, the surjection JVJJQ in (4.4) splits J-colinearly. Therefore, it splits, as desired, as a morphism in ModKJ, as is seen from the following.

Fact. A surjective morphism p:MN in ModKJ splits if it splits J-colinearly.

This fact is proved by dualizing the argument proving [Citation3, Theorem 1], as follows. Since J is projective as a right K-module by [Citation7, Theorem 1.3], we have a right K-linear map ξ:JK such that εJ=εK°ξ. Let nn(0)n(1) represent the J-coaction ρN:NNJ on N. By direct computations we see that the K-action NKN, ncnc splits in ModKJ, having σ:NNK,  σ(n)=n(0)SK(ξ(n(1))(1))ξ(n(1))(2) as a section. To see, for example, that σ is J-colinear, we compute the J-coaction on σ(n) so that ρN(σ(n))=n(0)SK(ξ(n(2))(2))ξ(n(2))(3)n(1)SK(ξ(n(2))(1))ξ(n(2))(4)=n(0)SK(ξ(n(2))(1))ξ(n(2))(4)n(1)SK(ξ(n(2))(2))ξ(n(2))(3)=n(0)SK(ξ(n(2))(1))ξ(n(2))(2)n(1)=σ(n(0))n(1), where n(0)n(1)n(2) represents ρN(n(0))n(1) (=n(0)ΔJ(n(1))); notice that the second and the last equalities hold since K and J are cocommutative. Choose a J-colinear section s:NM of p. Then the composite NσNKsidKMKM, where the last arrow indicates the K-action on M, is seen to be a desired section. □

By Lemma 4.1 we can choose a section γ:JQJVJ of the natural surjective morphism JVJJQ in ModKJ. Notice that it is necessarily of the form γ(aq)=a(1)g(a(2)q), where aJ, qQ and g=(εJidQ)°γ. Recall here that we are discussing purely odd super-objects.

In addition, recall from Example 3.8 that J(Q) and J(VJ) are the co-free J-super-coalgebras on the purely odd J-super-comodules JQ and JVJ, respectively. Then we see that the J-colinear map γ between those J-super-comodules uniquely extends to a graded coalgebra map γ˜:J(Q)J(VJ), such that γ˜(0)=idJ,γ˜(1)=γ

in degrees 0 and 1, and γ˜(n)(a(q1qn))=a(1)(g(a(2)q1)g(a(n+1)qn)) in degree n2, where aJ and qiQ,1in. As a super analogue of (4.3) we have the category SModKJ of J-comodules in SModK, which is indeed a symmetric monoidal category, (4.5) (SModKJ, J, J),(4.5) just as (SModJ,J,J) is; see Lemma 3.1. Notice that J(Q) and J(VJ) are co-free coalgebras in (SModKJ, J, J) in a generalized sense (defined in an obvious manner), and γ˜, arising from the morphism γ in the category, is a coalgebra morphism in the category.

Define a morphism in SModKJ by (4.6) τ:J(VJ)(VJ)J,τ(au)=(uS(a(1)))a(2),(4.6) where aJ, u(VJ). Here, on the target (VJ)J, K acts and J coacts on the tensor factor J. We see that τ is in fact a graded coalgebra isomorphism with inverse (VJ)JJ(VJ),uaa(1)(ua(2)).

Choosing a totally ordered basis X=(xλ)λΛ of VJ, one obtains the opposite-sided version ϕX:(VJ)JJ of the ϕX in (2.11), which is a coalgebra isomorphism in SModJ. Define Γ:J(Q)J to be the composite J(Q)γ˜J(VJ)τ(VJ)JϕXJ.

This is a coalgebra morphism in SModK, which sends a1(Q) to a for every aJ.

Proposition 4.2.

The right K-linear extension of Γ ΓK:(J(Q))KKJ,ΓK(wKz)=Γ(w)z, where wJ(Q), zK, is a coalgebra isomorphism in SModK, which sends (a1(Q))K1K to a for every aJ.

Proof.

Clearly, ΓK is a coalgebra morphism in SModK, which sends (a1(Q))K1K to a for every aJ. To see that it is an isomorphism, we aim to prove that gr(ΓK) is bijective. Notice that gr(ϕX°τ)=gr(ϕX)°τ:J(VJ)grJ coincides with the canonical isomorphism J(VJ)grJ in (2.13). Using the similar isomorphism K(VK)grK, one sees that gr(ΓK) coincides with the composite J(Q)(VK)γ˜id(VK)J(VJ)(VK)idJprodJ(VJ), where prod:(VJ)(VK)(VJ) denotes the product in (VJ).

Regard (VK)(VJ) as Hopf superalgebras, naturally as in the beginning of Section 2.3. Clearly, gr(ΓK) is a coalgebra morphism in SMod(VK). Since εid(VK):J(VJ)(VJ) is a coalgebra morphism in SMod(VK), we can regard gr(ΓK) as a (VJ)-coalgebra morphism in SMod(VK) (in a sense slightly generalized from Definition 3.2), or in other words (see Lemma 3.3), as a coalgebra morphism in (SMod(VK)(VJ), (VJ), (VJ)), which is indeed a symmetric monoidal category just as the one in (4.5). Since (VJ)//(VK) is naturally isomorphic to (Q), it follows essentially by [Citation17, Theorem 1] (see also [Citation9, Proposition 1.1]) that the symmetric monoidal category above is equivalent to (SMod(Q), (Q), (Q)) through the functor which assigns to an object M in the former category, M(VK)k (=M/M((VK))+),

where one should notice ((VK))+=n>0n(VK). Therefore, for our aim, it suffices to prove that gr(ΓK)(VK)k:J(Q)J(VJ)(VK)k=J(Q) is bijective, or is indeed the identity map. One sees that this is a graded coalgebra endomorphism which is identical clearly in degree 0, and also in degree 1 by choice of γ. By co-freeness of J(Q) (see Example 3.8) it must be the identity map in view of Remark 3.9. □

Now, we regard VKVJ as left K-modules with respect to the left adjoint action (see (2.9)), so that Q is a left K-module, and (Q) is a coalgebra in the monoidal category KSMod of left K-supermodules. Construct JK(Q). This is a graded coalgebra such that (4.7) (JK(Q))(0)=J//K (:=J/JK+),(JK(Q))(1)=JKQ,(4.7) whence it is a J//K-super-coalgebra with respect to the projection onto the neutral component; notice that the associated J//K-coaction on JKQ (see (3.6)) is the natural one on the tensor factor J. Moreover, we have the following.

Proposition 4.3.

JK(Q) is co-free on JKQ.

This proposition and the following will be proved below together.

Proposition 4.4.

Assume one of the following (i)–(iv):

  1. J is pointed (this is satisfied if k is algebraically closed);

  2. K is finite-dimensional;

  3. VK is stable in VJ under the J-action (this is satisfied if K is normal in J);

    1. K is smooth as a coalgebra (this is satisfied if char k=0), and

    2. K includes the coradical Corad J of J.

Then there is a J//K-colinear isomorphism JKQJ//KQ. It extends to an isomorphism of graded coalgebras (4.8) JK(Q)J//K(Q)(4.8) which is the identity map of J//K in degree 0, and is the previous isomorphism in degree 1.

Proof of Propositions 4.3

and 4.4. By (4.7) we have a canonical morphism (4.9) JK(Q)coFJ//K(JKQ)(4.9) of graded coalgebras, which is identical in degrees 0 and 1. We wish to show that this is an isomorphism, which will prove Proposition 4.3. Replacing everything with its base extension to the algebraic closure k¯ of k, we may suppose that k is algebraically closed. Then J is pointed, whence we have a J//K-colinear and right K-linear isomorphism (4.10) JJ//KK(4.10) by [Citation7, Theorem 1.3 (4)]. With KQ and K(Q) applied, this induces a J//K-colinear isomorphism JKQJ//KQ and an isomorphism such as (4.8). The morphism (4.9) is then identified, through the isomorphisms just obtained, with a graded coalgebra map J//K(Q)coFJ//K(J//KQ) which is identical in degrees 0 and 1. By co-freeness of J//K(Q) (see Example 3.8) this must be an isomorphism in view of Remark 3.9.

Let us turn to Proposition 4.4. The argument above proves it in Cases (i) and (ii), since we then have an isomorphism such as (4.10) by [Citation7, Theorem 1.3 (4)], again. In Case (iv), as well, we have such an isomorphism. To see this, assume (iv). By modifying the proof of [Citation8, Theorem 4.1, Lemma 4.2] into the cocommutative situation, we see that the inclusion KJ has a right K-linear coalgebra retraction, say, r:JK, and JJ//KK,aa¯(1)r(a(2)) gives a desired isomorphism. Here and below we let aa¯ present the natural projection JJ//K.

Finally, assume (iii). Then Q is naturally a left J-module. We see that (4.11) JKQJ//KQ,aKqa¯(1)(a(2)q)(4.11) is a J//K-colinear isomorphism, which indeed has a¯qa(1)K(S(a(2))q) as an inverse; see [Citation17, p. 456, line 6] or [Citation8, Eq. (4)]. An obvious modification with Q replaced by (Q) gives an isomorphism such as (4.8). Alternatively, the isomorphism follows from (4.11), in virtue of the co-freeness shown by Proposition 4.3 and Example 3.2. □

Remark 4.5.

It is known that there exist (cocommutative) Hopf algebras JK over a non-algebraically closed field, for which there does not exist any isomorphism such as (4.10), or J is not even free as a left or right K-module; see [Citation17, Section 5], for example.

Theorem 4.6.

We have the following.

  1. There is an isomorphism

    JK(Q)J//K

    of super-coalgebras, which, restricted to

    J//K (=JK0(Q))andJKQ (=JK1(Q)),

    is natural in the sense that it is induced from the natural projection JJ//K restricted to

    JandJVJ  (see(2.12)).

  2. gr K is naturally regarded as a graded Hopf sub-superalgebra of grJ. The natural projection grJgr(J//K) induces an isomorphism

    gr J//gr Kgr(J//K) (4.12)

    of graded coalgebras. These graded coalgebras are naturally isomorphic to the co-free J//K-super-coalgebra JK(Q) on JKQ; see Proposition 4.3.

Proof.

(1) Recall from Proposition 4.2 the isomorphism ΓK:(J(Q))KKJ, which has the property, among others, that it sends (a1(Q))K1K to a for every aJ. With KK/K+ applied, it induces a desired isomorphism. To verify the prescribed naturality, one uses the property above and the fact that the composite JVJτ(1)VJJproductJ of the first component τ(1) of the τ (see (4.6)) with the product in J coincides with the product map JVJJ, avav.

(2) We have the following commutative diagram in which the bottom horizontal arrow indicates the isomorphism just obtained,

[[INLINE FIGURE]]

This, with gr applied, induces

[[INLINE FIGURE]]

Here one should notice gr((J(Q))KK)=(J(Q))KgrK, using an isomorphism (grK=)K(VK)K analogous to (2.11). We see from the horizontal isomorphism at the top, which sends (1J1(Q))K1grK to 1grJ, that grK is a graded Hopf sub-superalgebra of grJ; see also [Citation9, Remark 3.8]. Moreover, the projection indicated by the vertical arrow on the RHS induces the isomorphism (4.12). The horizontal isomorphism at the bottom proves the last statement. □

There is given in [Citation9, Proposition 3.14 (1)] a description of J//K that looks similar to the one obtained in Theorem 4.6 (1). But the cited result assumes that J is irreducible, and indeed, the down-to-earth proof given there is not valid in the present general case. The description of ours gives a simpler and more natural proof of the following result reproduced from [Citation9].

Corollary 4.7.

[Citation9, Theorem 3.13 (2), (3)] We have the following.

  1. J//K is naturally isomorphic to the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra of J//K.

  2. Q is naturally isomorphic to the purely odd super-vector space P(J//K)1={z(J//K)1|ΔJ//K(z)=1¯z+z1¯}

of odd primitive elements of J//K, where 1¯=1Jmod(JK+).

Proof.

(1) Notice from Proposition 4.3 and the remark preceding Example 3.1 that J//K (=JK0(Q)) is the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra of JK(Q). Then the desired result follows from the isomorphism proved by Theorem 4.6 (1) and its partial naturality on J//K.

(2) Notice that taking P( ) is compatible with base extension. Then by using the isomorphism (4.8) after base extension to the algebraic closure of k, we see P(JK(Q))1=KKQ (=Q).

The desired result follows from the isomorphism proved by Theorem 4.6 (1) and its partial naturality on JKQ (=JK1(Q)). □

As another advantage (from [Citation9]) of our more conceptual treatment that uses the notion of co-free super-coalgebras, we have the following smoothness criteria for J//K.

Theorem 4.8.

We have the following.

  1. J//K is smooth if and only if so is J//K.

  2. J//K is smooth if char k=0.

Proof.

(1) By Theorem 4.6 we may suppose J//K=coFJ//K(JKQ). We claim that the J//K-comodule JKQ is injective, or equivalently, co-flat; see [Citation16, Proposition A.2.1]. Indeed, the co-flatness (that is, the right exactness of the associated co-tensor product functor) follows, since the comodule turns into the co-free comodule J//KQ after base extension to the algebraic closure of k; see the proof of Proposition 4.3. The claim, combined with Proposition 3.10 and Remark 3.11, proves the desired result.

(2) By Part 1 it suffices to prove that the coalgebra J//K is smooth in case chark=0. In view of [Citation4, Proposition 1.5] we may suppose by base extension such as above that k is algebraically closed, in which case J and K are smash products (see Section 2.5) J=kGJUJ,K=kGKUK, where we have set GL=G(L),GK=G(K),UJ=U(P(L)),UK=U(P(K)).

We see J//Kk(GL/GK)UL//UK as coalgebras. It remains to prove that k(GL/GK) and UL//UK are both smooth coalgebras. First, k(GL/GK), being spanned by the grouplike elements of all right cosets of GL by GK , is a smooth coalgebra. So is UL//UK, since it is a pointed irreducible coalgebra of Birchkoff-Witt type, or more explicitly, it is isomorphic to the tensor product UL//UKλΛCλ

of coalgebras Cλ, each of which is spanned by the divided power sequence of infinite length 1,xλ,12xλ2, 13!xλ3, , 1n!xλn,  in UL , where (xλ)λΛ are arbitrarily chosen elements of P(L) such that they modulo P(K) form a k-basis of P(L)/P(K). □

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referee for helpful suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

The second-named author was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Numbers 20K03552 and 23K03027.

References

  • Carmeli, C., Caston, L., Fioresi, R. (2011). Mathematical Foundations of Supersymmetry. EMS Series of Lectures in Mathematics. Zürich: European Mathematical Society.
  • Dăscălescu, S., Năstăsescu, C., Raianu, Ş. (2001). Hopf Algebras: An Introduction. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 235. New York/Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
  • Doi, Y. (1990). Hopf extensions of algebras and Maschke type theorems. Israel J. Math. 72(1–2):99–108. DOI: 10.1007/BF02764613.
  • Farinati, M. A., Solotar, A. (2001). Extensions of cocommutative coalgebras and a Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg type theorem. Commun. Algebra 29(10):4721–4758. DOI: 10.1081/AGB-100106783.
  • Hoshi, M., Masuoka, A., Takahashi, Y. (2020). Hopf-algebra techniques applied to super Lie groups over a complete field. J. Algebra 562:28–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2020.06.019.
  • Manin, Y. (1997). Gauge Field Theory and Complex Geometry. Translated from the 1984 Russian original by N. Koblitz and J. R. King, 2nd ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 289. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Masuoka, A. (1991). On Hopf algebras with cocommutative coradicals. J. Algebra 144:451–466. DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(91)90116-P.
  • Masuoka, A. (2003). Hopf cohomology vanishing via approximation by Hochschild cohomology. Banach Center Publ. 61:111–123.
  • Masuoka, A. (2005). The fundamental correspondences in super affine groups and super formal groups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202(1–3):284–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2005.02.010.
  • Masuoka, A. (2012). Harish-Chandra pairs for algebraic affine supergroup schemes over an arbitrary field. Transform. Groups 17(4):1085–1121. DOI: 10.1007/s00031-012-9203-8.
  • Masuoka, A., Oka, T. (2005). Unipotent algebraic affine supergroups and nilpotent Lie superalgebras. Algebras Represent. Theory 8(3):397–413. DOI: 10.1007/s10468-005-8204-x.
  • Masuoka, A., Takahashi, Y. (2021). Geometric construction of quotients G/H in supersymmetry. Transform. Groups 26(1):347–375. DOI: 10.1007/s00031-020-09583-3.
  • Masuoka, A., Zubkov, A. N. (2011). Quotient sheaves of algebraic supergroups are superschemes. J. Algebra 348:135–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.08.038.
  • Masuoka, A., Zubkov, A. N. (2022). Group superschemes. J. Algebra 605:89–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2022.04.027.
  • Sweedler, M. E. (1969). Hopf Algebras. New York: W. A. Benjamin, Inc.
  • Takeuchi, M. (1979). Formal schemes over fields. Commun. Algebra 5(14):1483–1528. DOI: 10.1080/00927877708822227.
  • Takeuchi, M. (1979). Relative Hopf modules-equivalences and freeness criteria. J. Algebra 60:452–471. DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(79)90093-0.

Appendix:

On formal superschemes

Let us translate some of the results obtained in the text into the language of formal superschemes. The authors do not know any literature which discusses in detail theory of formal schemes over a field such as developed by [Citation16], in the generalized super context. But, at least basic definitions and results found in part of [Citation16] are directly generalized as will be seen below. We continue to suppose chark2 and that super-coalgebras and Hopf superalgebras are super-cocommutative.

A set-valued (resp., group-valued) functor defined on the category SAlgk of super-commutative superalgebras is called a super k-functor (resp., super k-group); see [Citation13, Section 3], for example.

Let C be a super-coalgebra (over k). Given an object RSAlgk, RC is a super-coalgebra over R. Let GR(RC)={g(RC)0|Δ(g)=gRg, ε(g)=1R} denote the set of all even grouplike elements of RC. This is naturally a group if C is a Hopf superalgebra. One sees that RGR(RC) gives rise to a functor, Sp*(C), which is called the formal superscheme or formal supergroup corresponding to C. The formal superscheme Sp*(C) is said to be smooth if C is a smooth super-coalgebra. Every formal supergroup is smooth if chark=0. See the paragraphs following Remark 3.9.

The assignment CSp*(C) gives rise to a category equivalence from the category of super-coalgebras (resp., Hopf superalgebras) to that full subcategory of the category of super k-functors (resp., super k-groups) which consists of all formal superschemes (resp., formal supergroups). The source category has (possibly, infinite) direct products given by the tensor product ⊗, and the target full subcategory is closed under the direct product. By this fact on the category of super-coalgebras (resp., formal superschemes) one can define group objects in the respective categories, which are precisely Hopf superalgebras (resp., formal supergroups); see [Citation2, Appendix B], for example.

We remark that the category of formal superschemes consists precisely of those super k-functors X such that X is isomorphic to the inductive limit associated to some filtered inductive system (Xλ,uλμ) of finite affine superschemes, where each Xλ is thus represented by a finite-dimensional super-commutative superalgebra, say, Aλ, and the morphism uλμ:XλXμ for λ<μ is supposed to be a closed immersion, or namely, to arise from a surjective superalgebra map AμAλ. It follows that the category is included in the category of sheaves in the fppf topology (faisceaux). Also, a monomorphism Sp*(C)Sp*(D) of formal superschemes uniquely arises from an injective super-coalgebra map CD. Therefore, we may and we do call Sp*(C) as a formal sub-superscheme (resp., formal sub-supergroup) of Sp*(D) if C is a sub-super-coalgebra (resp., Hopf sub-superalgebra) of a super-coalgebra (resp., Hopf superalgebra) D.

Given a super k-functor X, we have a super k-functor, Xev, defined by Xev(R):=X(R0),RSAlgk.

If X is a formal superscheme or a formal supergroup, so is Xev. For if X=Sp*(C), then Xev=Sp*(C), where C is the largest purely even sub-super-coalgebra of C; see (2.6). In this case, Xev can be regarded as an ordinary formal scheme or group. In general, every (ordinary) formal scheme, say, Sp*(D) is regarded as a formal superscheme, with D regarded as a (purely even) super-coalgebra. It is smooth at the same time as a formal scheme and as a formal superscheme.

Let G=Sp*(J) be a formal supergroup corresponding to a Hopf superalgebra J. As in (2.8), let VJ=P(J)1 be the purely odd super-vector space of odd primitive elements of J. One sees that Gev is a formal sub-supergroup of G. The following results from the isomorphism ϕX in (2.11).

Proposition A.1.

We have a Gev-equivariant isomorphism Gev×Sp*((VJ))G of formal superschemes.

A group-equivariant object in the category of super-coalgebras is a coalgebra in the monoidal category JSMod (or SModJ) of left (or right, according to the side on which J acts) supermodules. On the other hand, such an object in the category of formal superschemes is called a left or right formal G-superscheme. Obviously, those objects in the respective categories are in a category equivalence. In Proposition A.1, G is regarded as a left formal Gev-superscheme by multiplication.

Retain G=Sp*(J) as above, and let H=Sp*(K) be a formal sub-supergroup of G; thus, K is a Hopf sub-superalgebra of J. Then for every RSAlgk, H(R) is a subgroup of G(R). It holds that H is normal, that is, for every R, H(R) is a normal subgroup of G(R), if and only if K is a normal Hopf sub-superalgebra of J. Define G/H:=Sp*(J//K), where J//K is as in (4.1); this is a formal supergroup in case H is normal. Then we have the co-equalizer diagram G×HGG/H in the category of formal superschemes (formal supergroups, in case H is normal), where the paired arrows indicate the multiplication and the projection. Main interest of ours is in the case where H is not normal in G.

In case G and hence H are formal groups, the formal superscheme arising from the quotient formal scheme G/H coincides with the quotient formal superscheme which one constructs, regarding G and H as formal supergroups.

Theorem A.2.

We have the following.

  1. The morphism Gev(G/H)ev arising from the quotient GG/H induces an isomorphism

    Gev/Hev(G/H)ev

    of formal schemes.

  2. G/H is smooth if and only if so is Gev/Hev.

  3. G/H is smooth if chark=0.

Part 1 above is a restatement of Corollary 4.7 (1), while the rest is that of Theorem 4.8.

Recall VJ=P(J)1. Let VK=P(K)1, and define Q:=VJ/VK, as in (4.2). The isomorphisms obtained in Proposition 4.2 and Theorem 4.6 (1) are translated as follows.

Theorem A.3.

There is an H-equivariant isomorphism (A.1) (Gev×Sp*((Q)))×HevHG(A.1) of formal superschemes, which induces an isomorphism (A.2) Gev×HevSp*((Q))G/H(A.2) of formal superschemes.

In accordance with the fact (see Section 4) that (Q) is a coalgebra in SModK and in KSMod, we have regarded Sp*((Q)) as a right (for (A.1)) and left (for (A.2)) formal Hev-superschme, where Hev=Sp*(K).

The product ×Hev above is defined in general, as follows. Given a formal supergroup F=Sp*(F), a right formal F-superscheme X=Sp*(X) and a left formal F-superscheme Y=Sp*(Y), we define X×FY by X×FY:=Sp*(XFY).

This superscheme is characterized by the co-equalizer diagram X×F×YX×YX×FY in the category of formal superschemes, where the paired arrows indicate the right F-action on X and the left F-action on Y. In addition, for (A.1), notice that X×FY is naturally a right formal Y-superscheme, in case Y is a formal supergroup including F as a formal sub-supergroup.

Remark A.4.

As analogues to Theorem A.3, Proposition 4.8 and Corollary 4.10 (see also Remark 4.13) of [Citation12] prove results on affine algebraic supergroups, for which the situation is more complicated, so that the analogous isomorphisms hold only locally.