798
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Our Conception of Competitiveness: Unified but Useless?

Pages 365-378 | Published online: 29 Apr 2015
 

Abstract

‘Competitive’ is one of the most commonly and confidently used words in sports. I argue that, while this term does have necessary and sufficient conditions, it is still a fairly useless one. Knowing someone is competitive does not tell one about the type of desire to win, the type of quantity of that desire, and the precise way in which one wants to be better. We also don’t know who a person feels a desire to beat, when winning actually becomes a goal, and what kind of knowledge and talents that person has at their disposal. Without this information, knowing someone is competitive tells you very little.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. This focus on what we mean when we speak of a competitive psychology also makes my focus quite different than most philosophers of sport who write on competition. Most philosophers dealing with the topic write on either the metaphysics of what makes something a competition, or on the ethics of whether winning is a justifiable aim.

2. Note that I’m defining what might be called ‘occurent competitiveness’ – an active desire to do better than one’s competition. There’s also what might be called ‘standing competitiveness’ – having a psychological makeup such that this state would become occurrent in the right circumstances. So one might refer to someone as a competitive lacrosse player (in the standing sense), even if that person is now sleeping, or eating lunch, not thinking of lacrosse at all.

3. I’ve been emphasizing what our hearing of someone’s competitiveness doesn’t tell us. The question of what people do tend to expect from competitive (perhaps by relying on stereotypes) is an interesting empirical question. So is the question of which type of competitiveness is actually statistically most common.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Todd Jones

Philosophy Department, University of Nevada – Las Vegas, UNLV 4505, Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 272.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.