82
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Empirical comparison of error rate-estimators in logistic discriminant analysis

&
Pages 111-120 | Received 28 Sep 2005, Published online: 05 Dec 2008
 

Abstract

A simulation study related to the comparison of 15 estimators of the actual-error rate in two-group logistic discriminant analysis is achieved in 528 cases taking into account some characteristics of the groups such as the common distribution of the variables, the overlap of the populations, the number of variables, etc. For each combination of these parameters, the relative errors of the estimators with regard to the theoretical actual-error rate (empirically determined) are computed and help to compare the performance of the estimators. The results show an overall best performance of the estimators e632 and eOS. On the contrary, the estimators eA, epp and eppcv record the lowest performance in terms of the mean relative error and the mean relative bias. Moreover, the performance of most of the parametric estimators depends on the normality and heteroscedasticity degrees of the populations.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification :

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,209.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.