Abstract
The power of several EDF goodness-of-fit statistics was evaluated for the two-parameter Weibull distribution following estimation by maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), good linear unbiased estimators (GLUEs), and modified GLUEs (MGLUEs). Relative power of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-von Mises-type statistics was a function of level of Type I1 censoring, sample size, and method of parameter estimation. In generalW 2 and A 2 displayed more power than D U 2, and VPower was a function of method of estimation, but no one method was superior in all situations.