Abstract
The aim was to examine the accuracy of unconditioned behavioural observation audiometry (BOA) in predicting hearing acuity in children and the validity of test results at various frequencies. The study was designed to longitudinally compare each child's best BOA response level (at the age >12 months) with the conclusive pure-tone threshold of the better ear. The subjects were 119 children derived from a material of 353 children fitted with a hearing aid at Helsinki University Central Hospital. BOA was carried out on 119 children, 19 of whom did not respond to frequency-specific stimuli. The predictive power of BOA depended on the severity of hearing loss. At the hearing level of 30-39 dB, BOA registered 10-15 dB poorer levels than the pure-tone audiometry. The pure-tone averages (0.5, 1, 2 kHz) of 50-69 dB agreed best with the BOA responses. In severe impairments (more than 70 dB HL), the BOA registered too good hearing. Correlation of the results from the two modes to measure hearing level was highly significant ( r =0.71, p =0.000), and the pure-tone hearing level agreed with that of BOA at the frequencies 0.5 to 4 kHz. Our results show that BOA averages ≤30 dB rarely indicate hearing loss demanding fitting of a hearing aid.